Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

What we know about Trump's 'Project Freedom' in Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

President Donald Trump has announced the US will help "guide" ships that have been stranded by Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This, he said, was a humanitarian gesture "meant to free up people, companies, and Countries that have done absolutely nothing wrong".

Iran says vessels can only cross it with its authorisation. Iran's military says it has fired at US warships to deter them from trying and the US says it has sunk small boats – threatening a ceasefire meant to end the war.

What does Trump's "Project Freedom" entail and could it lead to a wider resumption of hostilities?

The Hormuz Strait has remained largely blocked since the US and Israel launched air strikes on Iran on 28 February – and Tehran responded by blocking the crucial waterway through which 20% of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas is meant to pass freely.

An estimated 20,000 sailors and 2,000 ships have been trapped since, according to the International Maritime Organisation – a UN agency that regulates shipping.

There has been growing concern over dwindling supplies and the effects on sailors' physical and mental health.

US Central Command (Centcom) says that "guided-missile destroyers, over 100 land and sea-based aircraft, multi-domain unmanned platforms, and 15,000 service members" are being used to support the operation.

In a briefing on the first day of the operation, Centcom commander Adm Brad Cooper said vessels from 87 countries were stranded in the Gulf – and the US had contacted "dozens of ships and shipping companies to encourage traffic flow through".

What remains unclear is whether the US will attempt to provide stranded ships with a military escort.

Cooper said a "much broader defensive package" than would be required solely to escort ships was on offer, without giving details.

Mick Mulroy, a former US deputy assistant secretary of defence for the Middle East and a veteran of both the Marine Corps and the CIA's paramilitary wing, told the BBC he believed that Project Freedom would be focused on providing air cover and defence from missile and drone attacks – rather than a physical escort of those vessels through the Strait of Hormuz.

However, Mulroy said there was no guarantee it would be successful in helping restore freedom of movement and commerce in the strait.

"The question is whether ships will trust their ability to get through without being attacked, and more importantly, the insurance company," he said.

"If not, the effort will not have the impact we hoped."

Tim Wilkins, managing director at Intertanko, a trade body representing independent tanker owners and operators, told the BBC there was "no structured convoy or co-ordination mechanism in place" and members were asking, "who initiates these transits? Who communicates with the authorities on behalf of the vessel? And, indeed – a critical one – what is the fallback if a vessel is challenged by Iranian forces during the transit?"

On Monday afternoon, Centcom said US Navy guided-missile destroyers were operating in the Gulf "after transiting the Strait of Hormuz in support of Project Freedom".

It added American forces were "actively assisting efforts to restore transit for commercial shipping" but gave no details.

"As a first step, 2 U.S.-flagged merchant vessels have successfully transited through the Strait of Hormuz and are safely headed on their journey," Centcom also said. Again, no details were released about the identity of the commercial vessels.

Shipping company Maersk did confirm that one of its vessels had been able to exit the Gulf, accompanied by the US military.

But Iran's powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps denied any vessels had passed through the Strait.

Hours after the US operation was meant to have begun on Monday, the Iranian military said it had fired against "American and Zionist enemy destroyers", which it said the Americans had "disregarded".

Centcom quickly denied the Iranian claims that one of its warships had been hit by two missiles.

According to Centcom, Iran did fire cruise missiles at both US warships and US-flagged commercial ships, while drones and small boats were used against commercial ships.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump also said Iran had "taken some shots" at "unrelated nations".

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) – a Gulf ally of the US, which has often been attacked by Iran during the war – said a tanker affiliated with Adnoc, its state-owned oil company, had been targeted by two drones as it transited the Strait of Hormuz.

No-one was injured, the country's foreign ministry said in a statement. At least three missile interceptions were also reported.

A suspected strike also hit a South Korean cargo vessel anchored in the Strait of Hormuz, in waters near the UAE.

Centcom commander Cooper said that some of the US attack helicopters supporting the mission had been used to sink six small Iranian boats that were targeting civilian vessels. Iran has denied this.

Grant Rumley, a Middle East expert who served as an adviser to both the Biden and Trump White Houses between 2018 and 2021, said that securing passage for all the ships in the Gulf would be "very, very hard".

Doing so, he says, may require a stronger, more "kinetic" military option – a possibility he views as likely.

"I think that the general consensus is that a resumption of hostilities is a question of when," he said. "Not if."

Nitya Labh, a fellow on the International Security Programme at London's Chatham House, said the US operation was "extremely risky".

"I think what's happening is quite escalatory, it suggests the US isn't willing to negotiate over the terms of reopening the Strait," she told the BBC.

"The US has accepted that the only way to continue to move shipping is under the threat of force or strikes from Iran," Labh said.

She added that, even if President Trump's "Project Freedom" succeeded in getting some vessels out of the Hormuz Strait, "it will be a temporary relief at best" – a more sustained effort would be required to open up the critical waterway.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g437depzpo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Trump warns Taiwan against declaring independence, hours after summit with China's Xi

Published

on

Donald Trump has cautioned Taiwan against formally declaring independence from China.

"I'm not looking to have somebody go independent," the US president told Fox News on Friday, at the end of his two-day summit with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in Beijing.

Trump earlier said he had "made no commitment either way" about the self-governing island – which China claims as part of its territory and has not ruled out taking by force.

The US has long supported Taiwan, including being bound by law to provide it with a means of self-defence, but has frequently had to square this alliance with maintaining a diplomatic relationship with China.

Washington's established position is that it does not support Taiwanese independence, with continued ties with Beijing being contingent on its acceptance that there is only one Chinese government.

Many Taiwanese consider themselves to be part of a separate nation – though most are in favour of maintaining the status quo in which Taiwan neither declares independence from China nor unites with it.

In his interview with Fox News, Trump reiterated that US policy on the matter had not changed.

"You know, we're supposed to travel 9,500 miles (15,289km) to fight a war. I'm not looking for that. I want them to cool down. I want China to cool down."

On the flight back to Washington, the US president had told reporters that he and Xi had spoken "a lot" about the island, but said he had declined to discuss whether the US would defend it.

Xi "feels very strongly" about the island and "doesn't want to see a movement for independence", Trump said.

"The Taiwan question is the most important issue in China-US relations," Xi warned during the talks, according to Chinese state media, adding: "If mishandled, the two nations could collide or even come into conflict."

Asked if he foresaw a conflict with China over Taiwan, Trump had said: "No, I don't think so. I think we'll be fine. [Xi] doesn't want to see a war."

China has ramped up military drills around the island in recent years, raising tensions in the region and testing the balance that Washington has struck.

Late last year, the Trump administration announced an $11bn ($8bn) package of weapons to be sold to Taiwan, including advanced rocket launchers and a variety of missiles, which Beijing condemned.

Trump said he would soon decide whether that sale could go ahead, adding that he and Xi had discussed it "in great detail" and that he would speak to Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te first.

"I may do it. I may not do it," he told Fox News.

"We're not looking to have wars, and if you kept it the way it is, I think China's going to be OK with that. But we're not looking to have somebody say, 'Let's go independent because the United States is backing us'."

The US has previously provoked anger from China for seeming to soften its stance on independence.

Its State Department dropped a statement from its website reiterating Washington's opposition to Taiwanese independence in February 2025 – something Beijing said "sends a wrong… signal to separatist forces".

US officials in Taiwan said at the time: "We have long stated that we oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side."

Taiwan's Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung said his team had been monitoring the US-China summit, and had maintained good communication with the US and other countries "to ensure the stable deepening of Taiwan-US relations and safeguard Taiwan's interests".

He said Taiwan had always been a "guardian of peace and stability" in the region and accused China of escalating risk with its "aggressive military actions and authoritarian oppression".

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8p61v7l68o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Burnham cleared to run for selection in pivotal by-election

Published

on

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has been cleared to seek selection as Labour's candidate in a by-election which could pave the way for him to return to Westminster.

The mayor has been given the go-ahead by Labour's ruling National Executive Committee, which blocked his previous attempt to stand in a by-election in January.

If he is selected as the candidate in Makerfield, in the north-west of England, and goes on to win, Burnham is widely expected to try to replace Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister.

The prime minister is continuing to resist calls to stand down and set a timetable for his departure and is expected to fight any challenge from Burnham or other likely contenders.

The Makerfield constituency became vacant on Thursday, when Labour MP Josh Simons said he would resign to make way for Burnham.

The BBC understands the by-election is likely to take place on 18 June.

On Friday, the prime minister was in a police control centre in London but did not take questions from the media.

Steve Reed, the housing secretary and an ally of the PM, said: "It's been a very difficult week but we need to take a breath now, take this weekend to reflect on what's going on, and come back next week and focus on the country we were elected to serve."

Events have calmed down after a frenetic week of political activity which has seen the prime minister defy calls to step down, following his party's disastrous election results.

Nearly 90 Labour MPs have urged Sir Keir to go and five ministers have resigned but a leadership race cannot be triggered until someone, with the backing of 81 Labour MPs, formally challenges the prime minister.

Under Labour Party rules, Burnham is unable to join a leadership contest unless he becomes an MP.

Announcing his decision to apply to stand in Makerfield, Burnham said he wanted to "bring the change we have brought to Greater Manchester to the whole of the UK and make politics work properly for people".

He added that he would "not take a single vote for granted".

Applications to enter the process to become Labour's candidate close on Monday 18 May and a selection meeting will take place on 21 May.

Traditionally, Makerfield has been a safe Labour seat, but more recently has been leaning towards Reform UK and, if selected, it could prove a tricky race for Burnham to win.

Wes Streeting has been seen as a potential leadership candidate and speculation that he would launch a challenge mounted on Thursday when he resigned as health secretary.

Streeting called for a broad debate about what comes next but did not say he would run for leader.

His allies say he has the support of the 81 Labour MPs needed to enter a race.

In a post on social media, Streeting said he welcomed Burnham returning to Parliament, saying: "We need our best players on the pitch."

Former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has told the Guardian newspaper that she did not rule out running but would not "trigger" a leadership race.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: "Andy Burnham wants to rock up and just be prime minister despite being out of Parliament for a decade."

Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice said his party would be "throwing everything possible" to ensure a "seismic" win in the by-election.

The Green Party said: "We've learnt from our campaigning and wins in Gorton and Denton and the recent local elections, and we've shown we can beat Reform."

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgp2e0rrj4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Man arrested after referee Beaton and family put under police surveillance

Published

on

John Beaton was the referee at Fir Park on Wednesday evening

The Scottish FA says referee John Beaton and his family "spent last night at home under police surveillance following a leak of personal details online".

The association says that it is calling for "tolerance and perspective to prevent any further, unthinkable escalation".

And Police Scotland have confirmed a man, 19, has been arrested "in connection with a data protection offence".

Beaton has faced criticism following the award of a late penalty, which was converted, in Celtic's 3-2 win at Motherwell on Wednesday.

The incident at Fir Park, which involved VAR, was the latest in a series of controversial refereeing decisions as the Scottish Premiership title race reaches its conclusion.

Celtic's win kept them within a point of leaders Hearts. Those two sides meet at Celtic Park in Saturday's final top-six fixtures.

"The Scottish FA condemns in the strongest possible terms attempts to compromise the safety of match officials," said the SFA, which organises refereeing in the SPFL.

"Such vigilantism, motivated by decisions perceived to be right or wrong on a field of play, is a scourge on our national game and we are grateful to Police Scotland for their swift intervention.

"As we approach what should be an exciting finale to the season, we ask those who have personalised and hyperbolised their opinions, those who have sought the easy way out by attributing defeats to perceived refereeing errors, and those who have approved incendiary statements and posts to reflect on their contribution to creating an environment of intimidation, fear and alarm."

Police Scotland said in their statement: "Officers investigating a complaint of personal information being shared online relating to a Scottish football official, have arrested a 19-year-old man in connection with a data protection offence. Enquiries are continuing."

The impossible job? The pressure of refereeing Scotland's title decider

The SFA cited those they see as responsible for an escalation in tensions.

"We are also clear, sadly, that this is the inevitable consequence of the heightening criticism, intolerance and scapegoating demonstrated this season by media pundits, supporters, official supporters' groups, clubs, players, managers and former match officials," it said.

"We do not make that point lightly as the national association. Yet it is an inconvenient truth. Those who have sought to apportion blame and conspiracy towards match officials to deflect from defeats or perceived injustices throughout the season have contributed to an environment that puts the safety of our staff and match officials in jeopardy.

"This is the consequence of a hysterical media narrative, fuelled by irresponsible knee-jerk post-match media interviews, commentary and official social media posts.

"The cumulative effect impacts on our ability to provide enough referees to service our game at all levels. When it compromises the safety and wellbeing of our most senior match officials, enough is enough."

The impossible job? The pressure of refereeing Scotland's title decider

Everybody wants Hearts to win – Celtic boss O'Neill

Hearts ready to 'rip up script' in title showdown

Has last-gasp Celtic penalty undermined Hearts' hopes?

The SFA insisted their officials "are not infallible".

And they added: "Mistakes will be made on the field, and subjective calls made in front of the VAR monitor, just as managers will pick the wrong team, goalkeepers concede soft goals and strikers miss from five yards out. Yet the reaction to these inevitabilities could not be more contrasting.

"What happened yesterday is not an isolated incident. There are many examples of match officials being placed in harmful situations but with individuals fearful of speaking out lest it exacerbates the situation or causes further alarm to friends, family and colleagues.

"We will not allow this to become the norm. We will not allow a situation where match officials require special provision to protect their children at school to be considered an occupational hazard. We will not allow a situation where staying at home with the front door locked and avoiding the hazards of public interaction becomes a coping strategy.

"The Scottish FA will be seeking to strengthen its rules to better protect those integral to the game and urge those who will doubtless join us in condemning incidents like this to support those proposals, not contribute to their watering-down on the basis of self-preservation.

Celtic score controversial late penalty to set up epic final day

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c87qye8yjg2o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.