Connect with us

உலகம்

US Senate passes ICE funding resolution after ‘vote-a-rama’: What’s next?

Published

on

Republicans take first step, but long road remains to break impasse over funding of Trump’s immigration enforcement.

Republicans in the United States Senate have passed a resolution to fund US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the first step in ending a months-long standoff sparked by opposition to US President Donald Trump’s mass deportation drive.

Hours of debate gave way early Thursday to a vote on the resolution, in which Republicans, who hold a slim 53-47 majority in the chamber, used a tactic that allowed them to proceed with a simple majority rather than overcoming a 60-vote threshold.

In the end, 50 Republicans voted in favour, while two broke ranks and joined Democrats in voting against the resolution.

Still, Thursday’s vote was far from the final word on the matter. The Republican-controlled US House of Representatives must pass its own resolution.

Then, committees in the Senate and House must both craft the actual funding legislation, which will be subject to another round of votes.

Trump has said he wants the funding bill on his desk by June 1.

Condemnation of Trump’s hardline immigration drive crescendoed in January, when two US citizens, Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, were fatally shot by federal agents in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Democrats, who had been increasingly criticised for inaction during Trump’s second term, derailed pending legislation to fund the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees ICE.

Many noted the department and ICE had already received a massive discretionary windfall in a Republican-backed tax bill passed last year.

The move was a risky gambit, forcing the effective shutdown of DHS and leading to several knock-on effects, including Transportation Security Administration (TSA) staffing shortages that snarled airport traffic.

Trump subsequently signed an executive order to pay TSA staff, temporarily alleviating the problem, although officials have warned they face a funding cliff.

Still, Democrats have largely wagered it is more politically toxic to be seen as supporting Trump’s immigration policies, which have become increasingly unpopular among the US public, than to be blamed for the shutdown, which has stretched on for 68 days.

The Republican resolution effectively allows Senate committees to increase the federal government deficit by about $140bn to fund ICE and Border Patrol. However, top Republican officials have said the final legislation will likely total $70bn to fund both agencies for three and a half years.

Typically in the Senate, the minority party can use a so-called “filibuster” to block legislation. A party needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster.

With Democrats dug in in their opposition, Republicans are instead pursuing a convoluted process known as a “budget reconciliation”.

Passing funding via reconciliation requires only a simple majority, but it is generally a cumbersome, multi-step process that, among other drawbacks, eats up time that could be used on other legislation.

Under Senate rules, debate on budget resolutions is limited to 50 hours, which lawmakers reached shortly before passing the measure early on Thursday.

While Republican tactics neutralised Democrats’ ability to filibuster the resolution, the minority party still employed another tactic to both delay the final vote and to force Republicans to take positions on potentially politically fraught issues.

After the 50 hours of debate expired, Democrats conducted a so-called “vote-a-rama”, in which they introduced rapid-fire, often symbolic amendments, which were immediately voted on.

Prior to the early morning manoeuvre, the top Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, said the party would use the “vote-a-rama” to portray Republicans as out of touch with citizens’ affordability concerns, a key issue ahead of the midterm elections in November.

“This will be a reconciliation of contrasts, and we are relishing that fight,” Schumer said. “Republicans want to shell out billions of dollars to Donald Trump’s private army without any common-sense restraints or reforms. Democrats want to put money in people’s pockets by lowering their costs.”

Three Republicans broke from their party to support an amendment aimed at addressing the high rate of health insurance company delays and denials of claims, underscoring the issue’s salience for those facing punishing re-election campaigns.

Three Republicans also supported an amendment to slash prescription drug prices, introduced by progressive Senator Bernie Sanders.

Meanwhile, Senator John Kennedy, a Republican, sought to lay the groundwork to include the Trump-backed SAVE America Act, which supporters say will increase election security and detractors say will disenfranchise millions of voters, in the final funding legislation.

The push failed, with four Republicans voting against including Kennedy’s amendment.

The resolution passed by Republicans in the Senate is essentially a set of instructions for committees to build the eventual funding legislation. Republicans in the House could seek to change the parameters of those instructions, requiring lawmakers in both chambers to mediate the differences.

Once both sides approve the parameters, the real work of hammering out the final legislation will begin. It will eventually also be subject to another 50-hour debate process, which could then give way to yet another “vote-a-rama”.

Once both chambers pass the final legislation, it will go to US President Donald Trump’s desk for signing. Republicans have said they hope to advance the final legislation by next month.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/23/us-senate-passes-ice-funding-resolution-after-vote-a-rama-whats-next?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Police in Belfast use water cannon as anti-immigrant unrest continues

Published

on

Clashes come as family of knife attack victim calls for calm and condemns violence targeting immigrants.

Unrest in Northern Ireland: Second day of anti-immigration protests in Belfast

Police in the United Kingdom city of Belfast have used water cannon to disperse dozens of far-right protesters during a second night of unrest triggered by a knife attack involving a Sudanese refugee.

The clashes on Wednesday came as the family of the stabbing victim appealed for calm and condemned the wave of anti-immigrant violence in the city in Northern Ireland.

Police said the protesters threw “missiles” such as rocks and bottles at officers, while images from the scene showed several fires burning on the streets.

Police said officers deployed “water cannon in an attempt to maintain public order”.

But the unrest was markedly less severe than on Tuesday evening, when hundreds of masked men burned families out of their homes and set vehicles alight.

“We want to make it absolutely clear that overnight unrest is not welcome, and peaceful protest is the only way forward,” the family of the victim, Stephen Ogilvie, said in a statement.

“We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country… We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility,” it said.

The family added that Ogilvie, who lost an eye and suffered serious wounds to his neck and face, was in a stable condition.

Their appeal came as the suspect in the attack, a 30-year-old ‌Sudanese national named Hadi Alodid, appeared in court on charges including attempted murder.

He was remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to July 8.

Videos of the stabbing attack circulated online all day on Tuesday, sparking calls on social media for violent protest. Police had to help one family escape from a burning house, according to the Reuters news agency, while several cars and a bus were set on fire and reduced to shells.

Local politicians and a pastor said many of those targeted were Black.

UK minister Ruth Anderson said at least 27 people were made homeless in Belfast “because people went door-to-door to try and target foreign nationals”.

Resident Jamie Corry, 33, said he could only watch on as his house went up in flames.

“I was actually standing right there watching my whole house just go up, slowly but surely,” he told Reuters. “I told them and all, when they were lighting a car up on fire, ‘that’s my property, that’s my property’… and they still didn’t care.”

The attack comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted many messages that blamed migration on violence in the UK, sharing a post that argued that the “very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and open borders” is increasing tensions.

Amid calls from Musk, other far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson called for more protests on Wednesday, Northern Ireland’s police chief said ⁠an extra 200 officers were being deployed on the streets.

“These idiots didn’t just target ethnic minority groups… they targeted society,” Chief ⁠Constable Jon Boutcher said of Tuesday night’s rioters.

Officers had to take a family that included a two-month-old baby to safety during Tuesday’s violence, which he branded “a huge act of self-harm by mindless idiots”.

Speaking in London, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the knife attack raised serious questions, but that “driving people out of their homes is not … the right way to respond”.

He condemned the unrest as “shocking and completely unacceptable”.

Anna Turley, the chairwoman of the UK’s governing Labour Party, meanwhile, said that online platforms were “playing a role in driving” the unrest and suggested Musk was one of the “bad faith actors” inflaming tensions.

The United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned what he called “incitement” on social media. “Dehumanisation of whole groups within a society is totally unacceptable and frankly despicable,” he told reporters in Geneva, adding that the violence in both Northern Ireland and Southampton had been “really shocking”.

Social media providers, he insisted, must take seriously their responsibility to prevent hate speech and incitement to violence.

Immigration has historically been low in Northern Ireland, partly due to the three-decade conflict between mainly Catholic Irish nationalists seeking Irish unity and predominantly Protestant pro-British “loyalists” wanting to stay in the UK and the British military.

However, migration has increased in recent years, and there has been an increasing sentiment against it in both Northern Ireland and parts of the Republic of Ireland.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/police-in-belfast-use-water-cannon-as-anti-immigrant-unrest-continues?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Published

on

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Defiant crowds of Hezbollah supporters rallied in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighbourhood to support Iran’s role in standing against Israel, and rejecting efforts to separate Lebanon’s war from Iran’s. Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/11/dahiyeh-crowds-rally-in-favour-of-iranian-support-against-israel?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

OpenAI says China-based actors stoking opposition to AI data centres

Published

on

AI company says ChatGPT accounts sought to ‘exploit and amplify existing public concerns’ about energy prices.

China-based actors are likely behind the use of ChatGPT for “covert influence operations” aimed at stoking opposition to data centres in the United States, OpenAI has said.

In a research report released on Wednesday, the company behind the world’s most popular AI chatbot said it had banned a cluster of accounts likely based in China for attempting to “manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI”.

OpenAI, whose release of ChatGPT in 2022 kicked off a global frenzy around AI, said the accounts were used to generate social media comments and images that blamed data centres for rising electricity prices in communities across the US.

Among other content, the accounts generated a comic strip showing a cigar-chomping businessman holding bags marked with dollar signs as a family reacted in shock to their electricity bill, according to the San Francisco-based company.

OpenAI said a second cluster of accounts had generated content casting US tariffs as an effort to “dominate technological competition” with China, and specified that the material should not mention Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While the campaign sought to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” about energy prices, OpenAI found no evidence that it had a “meaningful” influence, the company said.

“Foreign influence operations have long sought to latch onto existing local issues and sincerely held beliefs, using them to build credibility, amplify divisions or exacerbate public distrust,” the ChatGPT creator said.

“In this case, the operators attempted to covertly insert themselves into an ongoing American debate about the future of the country’s AI capabilities while hiding who they were and what motivated them.”

China’s embassy in Washington, DC, said it was not familiar with the report but that it opposed “any groundless attacks or smears against China”.

“AI is profoundly changing the way people work and live. It is a new frontier for all humanity,” an embassy spokesperson said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.

“China believes in a people-centered approach to AI and advocates openness and inclusiveness to ensure AI is a force for good and for all.”

OpenAI is the latest prominent voice to suggest foreign influence could be behind opposition to AI in the US.

In May, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum told a policy event hosted by Breitbart News that the public’s increasingly negative sentiment towards the construction of data centres was not “organic” and could, in some cases, be linked to “foreign-sourced dark money”.

Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina, who studies foreign influence campaigns, expressed doubt that the campaign identified by OpenAI or any other coordinated effort would have much impact on the “volume or tone” of the public debate.

“My team is very familiar with the work of various Chinese influence actors, and the AI work China has done to date has been interesting but not effective,” Linvill told Al Jazeera.

“It’s getting better with each passing month, and I’m concerned what they may be capable of in the future, but they aren’t there yet.”

“If China were really serious about meaningfully influencing the discourse around data centres using AI chat bots, I question if they would use OpenAI to do it,” Linvill added.

Opposition to the construction of data centres has been on the rise in the US, with at least 36 projects blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, according to Data Center Watch, a research project by AI security company 10a Labs.

In March, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced legislation that would impose a moratorium on new data centres until the introduction of national safeguards to mitigate the risks of AI.

The legislation has little chance of becoming law in the near future due to US President Donald Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and Republicans’ control of both chambers of Congress.

Opposition to data centres has been driven in part by the huge amounts of energy they consume supporting the computing power needed to train and run AI models such as ChatGPT.

The facilities accounted for 1.5 percent of global electricity use in 2024, with consumption growing 12 percent annually over the last five years, according to the International Energy Agency.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/11/openai-says-china-based-actors-stoking-opposition-to-ai-data-centres?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.