Connect with us

உலகம்

Turkiye unveils its first intercontinental ballistic missile: What we know

Published

on

The Yildirimhan ICBM has a range 6,000km, with a maximum speed of Mach 25 and a payload capacity of 3,000kg.

Turkiye has unveiled a prototype of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) as part of a push to become self-reliant and to gain a foothold as a key defence player in the Middle East and among its NATO allies.

The ICBM, named Yildirimhan, meaning “lightning” in Turkish and developed by the Defence Ministry’s research and development centre, was unveiled on Tuesday at the SAHA 2026 Defence and Aerospace Exhibition at the Istanbul Expo Centre.

Why is this ICBM model significant, and what does it mean for Turkiye’s defence industry? Here’s what we know:

The Yildirimhan has a range of 6,000km (3,278 miles). According to the Federation of American Scientists, ballistic missiles with a range exceeding 5,500km (roughly 3,418 miles) are classed as ICBMs. If launched from Turkiye, the Yildirimhan will be able to hit targets across Europe, Africa and Asia.

According to the Turkish news agency Anadolu, the ICBM’s maximum speed is Mach 25, which is 25 times the speed of sound. It has four rocket propulsion engines and is fuelled by liquid nitrogen tetroxide. Its warhead has a payload capacity of 3,000kg.

Turkiye has not begun the production of the missile yet.

Addressing the exhibition in Istanbul on Tuesday, Defence Minister Yasar Guler said, “In this era where economic cost has become an asymmetric weapon, Turkiye offers its allies not only weapon systems but also technology and a sustainable security economy.”

Experts say the launch of a Turkish ICBM is significant for a number of reasons.

Ozgur Unluhisarcikli, regional director at the German Marshall Fund of the United States think tank, told Al Jazeera, “In my view, Turkiye does not need ICBMs to deter any immediate security threat it is facing. Therefore, it is not the ICBM, but the capability to produce it that is significant for Turkiye.”

Burak Yildirim, an Istanbul-based security and defence analyst,  said the Yildirimhan said the design of an ICBM was indirectly important for Turkey’s civilian space launch efforts; specifically the Delta-V programme, which is entirely civil and commercial in mandate, and aims to place Turkish satellites into orbit using the country’s own rockets.

“The physics of reaching orbit and the physics of intercontinental ballistic trajectory are closely related; the technology overlaps. In that sense, an ICBM-class capability is a natural if politically consequential-derivative of a serious space programme,” he told Al Jazeera.

“That said, we should be precise about what was actually unveiled at SAHA 2026: a concept, presented in mock-up form. There are no confirmed flight tests, technical specifications remain limited, and critical subsystems have not been publicly accounted for in any consistent detail. Even the most likely future test facility – a base in Somalia – has not yet been constructed. This is an announced ambition, not a fielded capability,” he added.

Ali Bakir, a senior nonresident fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, said the prototype marks a breakthrough for Ankara.

“This development symbolises a leap in its missile capabilities and technological advancement, enabling Turkiye to join the exclusive ranks of a handful of countries possessing such advanced defensive technologies,” he told Al Jazeera.

“Furthermore, this milestone underscores Ankara’s commitment not only to enhance its military power and defensive capabilities but also to strengthen its deterrence, positioning itself as a key ultra-regional power,” Bakir added.

The unveiling of the new missile comes amid serious tensions in the Middle East. While a fragile ceasefire between the warring sides in the US-Israel war on Iran holds following six weeks of strikes, a naval battle is playing out in the Gulf as Tehran continues to block the Strait of Hormuz and the US enforces a naval blockade of Iranian ports. Meanwhile, Israel continues to violate “ceasefires” reached in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

In March, when Iran was retaliating against the US-Israeli strikes by attacking US military assets and infrastructure in the Middle East, Ankara reported that NATO’s air defences shot down ballistic missiles fired towards Turkiye on March 4 and 9. Tehran denied firing any missiles at Turkiye and suggested Israel could be behind them as acts of sabotage.

In February, just days before the US-Israel war on Iran began, former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, whose party is projected to do well in the national election this year, was the latest prominent politician to declare Turkiye a threat to Israel.

Speaking at a conference, Bennett said Israel must not “turn a blind eye” to Turkiye, accusing it of being part of a regional axis “similar to the Iranian one”.

“A new Turkish threat is emerging,” Bennett said. “We must act in different ways, but simultaneously against the threat from Tehran and against the hostility from Ankara.”

Other Israeli politicians have made similar comments in the past few months. Turkiye, which has been seen as growing closer to other regional powers, including Saudi Arabia and Egypt, has strongly criticised Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza as well as violence inflicted on Palestinians in the occupied West Bank by Israeli settlers, often with support from Israeli forces.

While Israel has had an openly antagonistic relationship with Iran since the 1979 Islamic revolution, Israel-Turkiye relations have taken a more pragmatic line. However, since coming to power in the early 2000s, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been increasingly critical of Israel.

“The blood-stained genocide network continues to kill innocent children, women, and civilians without any rule or principle, ignoring all kinds of human values,” Erdogan said about Israel while addressing an international conference in Istanbul in April.

Bakir told Al Jazeera that fears around Israel are not the main factor behind the development of the ICBM, but the timing and nature of Turkiye’s advances with ballistic missiles are clearly intended to send messages to both allies and adversaries, including to “an increasingly hegemonic, expansive and aggressive Israel”.

“This development aligns with the long-term vision of the Justice and Development Party [AKP] and President Erdogan to reduce reliance on foreign defence equipment, increase self-sufficiency and establish a robust domestic defence industry that meets global standards,” he said.

“This initiative aims to address national needs, strengthen the country’s strategic autonomy, and tackle regional and international threats to Ankara’s national security and interests. This policy is proactive rather than reactionary,” Bakir added.

Yildirim, the Istanbul-based security analyst, said Israel’s demonstrated willingness to conduct deep strikes across the Middle East, including against state actors, has not gone unnoticed in Ankara.

“Turkiye and Israel have no formal conflict, but their strategic interests have diverged sharply, and the political relationship has deteriorated significantly in recent years. When Turkish officials speak of systems capable of reaching distant targets, the geography speaks for itself,” he said.

“But reducing this [unveiling of the ICBM] to a Turkey-Israel dynamic would be too narrow. Turkey is simultaneously managing a post-war Syria on its border, an unresolved situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, ongoing tensions with actors in Iraq and, critically, it recently experienced ballistic missiles fired from Iran being intercepted by NATO assets over its territory. Turkey is encircled by instability, and it is drawing the conclusion that abstract alliance guarantees are insufficient. It wants hard, sovereign deterrence,” he added.

The Yildirimhan announcement, he said, “is less about a specific threat and more about Turkiye declaring that it intends to be the kind of country that cannot be coe

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/7/turkiye-unveils-its-first-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-what-we-know?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Madrid captain Carvajal in race against time for Spain’s World Cup squad

Published

on

Spain international Dani ⁠Carvajal injured his right foot during a training session for Real Madrid last week.

Spain manager ‌Luis de la Fuente says ⁠Dani ⁠Carvajal could still make his World Cup squad but the right back must prove his ⁠fitness and form after suffering a foot injury in training ⁠with his club Real Madrid last week.

“Carvajal is a very important figure in our dressing room,” de la Fuente said on Wednesday.

“I actually spoke with him yesterday, so I’m aware ‌of what’s going on. He doesn’t have a specific injury, nothing serious, but he needs time to get back to his usual level.

“We’ll see in the remaining matches whether he truly gets the opportunity and delivers the performances.”

De ⁠la Fuente added that Carvajal, ⁠who made just one appearance for Spain in 2025, would understand if he is left out of the squad for the ⁠World Cup, which is being held in the United States, Canada ⁠and Mexico from June 11 to ⁠July 19.

He joins a list of players who have sustained injuries in the weeks before the World Cup with Spanish teammate Lamine Yamal among them.

Carvajal, 34, is approaching the final weeks of his contract with Real and has struggled for game time this season ‌amid competition from Trent Alexander-Arnold.

Spain begin their World Cup campaign against Cape Verde on June 15 ‌and ‌also face Saudi Arabia and Uruguay in Group H.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/5/7/madrid-captain-carvajal-in-race-against-time-for-spains-world-cup-squad?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

US reinstates deportation proceedings against Mohsen Mahdawi

Published

on

Palestinian student Mohsen Mahdawi accuses government of weaponising the immigration system to silence his advocacy for Palestinian rights.

The United States Board of Immigration Appeals has reinstated ⁠deportation proceedings against Palestinian student Mohsen Mahdawi, according to a court filing from his lawyers.

Immigration judge Nina Froes in February had blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to deport the Columbia University student, who ⁠was arrested last year following his participation in pro-Palestinian protests.

Froes ruled that the Trump administration had failed to meet the burden of proof and dismissed its evidence as inadmissible. Last month, Froes was fired by the Trump administration.

The Board of Immigration Appeals, part of the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, overturned Froes’s decision.

In a statement cited by the Reuters news agency on Wednesday, Mahdawi accused the Trump administration of weaponising the immigration system to silence his advocacy for Palestinian rights.

“The government is trying to punish and deport me, a stateless Palestinian refugee from the occupied West Bank, because it opposes my peaceful advocacy for human dignity and equal rights for Palestinians. But I remain unafraid and faithful that justice will prevail in America and in Palestine,” he said, in the statement shared by his legal team.

Mahdawi was arrested last year during an interview with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He was detained for two weeks and not charged with a crime. His legal team said he was arrested under an obscure legal provision that allows Secretary of State Marco Rubio to seek the deportation of individuals deemed to pose “adverse foreign policy consequences” for the US.

Trump has cracked down on ⁠pro-Palestinian movements by attempting to deport foreign protesters, threatening to freeze funds for universities where protests were held and scrutinising immigrants’ online speech.

Experts and activists have accused his administration of stifling free speech ⁠and academic freedom. The crackdown also faced legal and judicial roadblocks.

In March, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit against Harvard University worth billions of dollars after accusing the institution of violating the civil rights of Jewish and Israeli students in the aftermath of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/7/us-reinstates-deportation-proceedings-against-mohsen-mahdawi?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

What are US proposals to end war, and will Iran agree to them?

Published

on

Iran says it is reviewing a US proposal to end the US-Israel war on it that has caused a global energy crisis.

Iran says US proposal to end the war is still 'under review'

Iran has said that it was reviewing a United States peace proposal that sources said would formally end the war, while leaving unresolved the key US demands that Iran suspend its nuclear programme and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

An Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson quoted by Iran’s ISNA news agency said on Wednesday that Tehran would convey its response. US President Donald Trump said he believed Iran wanted an agreement.

“They want to make a deal. We’ve had very good talks over the last 24 hours, and it’s very possible that we’ll make a deal,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday.

A day before, Trump paused “Project Freedom” to reopen the blockaded strait, citing progress in peace talks. The de facto blockade of the waterway threatens to cause a global recession. Iran has been pressing to keep Hormuz under its control, through which a fifth of global oil and gas supply passes.

Here is more about the US proposal to end the war, and how experts think Iran would respond.

US media outlet Axios said the two sides were “getting close” to an agreement on a 14-point document. Under the memorandum, Iran would agree not to develop a nuclear weapon and halt enrichment of uranium for at least 12 years, it said.

The US would lift sanctions and release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets, and both sides, which have imposed competing blockades in the Strait of Hormuz, would reopen the critical waterway within 30 days of signing.

Iran has been under US sanctions for decades, and the lifting of some sanctions under the 2015 nuclear agreement was reversed after Trump walked out of the landmark deal signed under his predecessor, President Barack Obama. Billions of dollars of Iranian assets remain frozen in foreign banks due to the sanctions.

It is unclear how this memorandum differs from a 14-point plan proposed by Iran last week.

The Reuters news agency reported on Thursday, citing a source briefed on the mediation, that the US negotiations were being led by Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner. If both sides agreed on the preliminary deal, that would start the clock on 30 days of detailed negotiations to reach a full agreement.

The full agreement would end the competing US and Iranian blockades on the strait, lift US sanctions and release frozen Iranian funds. It would also include certain curbs on Iran’s nuclear programme, which was allowed by the United Nations nuclear watchdog.

While the sources said the memorandum would not initially require concessions from either side, they did not mention several key demands Washington has made in the past, which Iran has rejected, such as curbs on Iran’s missile programme and an end to its support for armed proxy groups in the Middle East.

The sources also made no mention of Iran’s existing stockpile of more than 400kg (900lb) of near-weapons-grade uranium.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump’s ally, said on Wednesday the two leaders agreed that all enriched uranium must be removed from Iran to prevent it from developing a nuclear bomb.

The US and Israel bombed Iranian nuclear sites last June during the 12-day war, after which Trump claimed that Tehran’s nuclear programme was obliterated. A significant portion of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile remains buried inside the bombed nuclear sites.

Tehran denies wanting to acquire a nuclear weapon. It insists its programme is for civilian purposes as allowed within its position as a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty.

Iran has yet to formally respond to the latest US proposal. However, Iranian leaders have pushed back against it.

Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaee, a spokesperson for the parliament’s powerful foreign policy and national security committee, described the text as “more of an American wish-list than a reality”.

Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf appeared to mock reports that the two sides were close, writing on social media in English that “Operation Trust Me Bro failed.”

Al Jazeera’s Resul Serdar Atas, reporting from Tehran, said on Thursday that Iran is still reviewing the US proposal, after which a response is expected to be given to the Pakistani mediators later today.

The Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Thursday that it welcomes the news of a potential agreement between Iran and the US, adding that it will not disclose additional information at this stage.

“As mediators, we will not lose the trust of both parties by revealing details,” it said in a statement quoted by Al Jazeera Arabic.

Atas said, “Iranians are saying that, at this stage, they’re not negotiating their nuclear programme; it’s only about ending the war on all fronts.”

He added that Tehran wants direct guarantees from the UN Security Council, a lifting of sanctions and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

“If that is achieved, in a second phase, they’re ready to discuss their nuclear programme.”

Al Jazeera’s Almigdad Alruhaid reported from Tehran on Tuesday that Iran has set “a very firm red line” on the nuclear file. “The nuclear enrichment programme is non-negotiable,” he said.

According to former US Assistant Secretary of State Mark Kimmitt, Trump’s reported demand that Iran halt all uranium enrichment is unrealistic and unlikely to be accepted by Tehran.

“If there is anything the Iranians are going to insist upon in these negotiations, it is their right to enrich uranium to the 3.67 percent level, which is allowed under nuclear non-proliferation treaties,” he told Al Jazeera.

Kimmitt added that even the 2015 nuclear deal permitted Iran to continue enrichment. Iran boosted its enrichment up to 60 percent after Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018, during his first term.

However, Kimmitt postulated that Trump might want Iran’s existing stockpile of enriched uranium outside of Iran. He added that Iran might either agree to move the enriched uranium outside the country or dilute it down to a non-enriched state.

Alruhaid, the Al Jazeera correspondent, however, said Iran is resisting handing over its existing stockpile of enriched uranium.

Iran is believed to have about 440kg (970lb) of uranium enriched to 60 percent. A 90 percent threshold of enriched uranium is needed to produce a nuclear weapon.

Al Jazeera’s Alruhaid said “the sovereignty on the Strait of Hormuz is becoming one of the main issues on the negotiating table.

“We are seeing the Iranians are tightening their control. They are setting new protocol, new mechanism for controlling that strategic chokepoint for each vessel that is to pass through.”

The US allies in the Gulf, who faced the brunt of Iranian retaliatory strikes, have been pushing for the restoration of navigation in the strait without any conditions. Iran carried out attacks on the Gulf nations, mainly targeting US military assets, after the US and Israel launched attacks on it on February 28.

Trump has repeatedly played up the prospect of an agreement that would end the war, so far without success. The two sides remain at odds over a variety of difficult issues, such as Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its control of the Strait of Hormuz.

A Pakistani source and another source briefed on the mediation told Reuters that an agreement was close on a one-page memorandum that would formally end the conflict, the agency reported on Thursday.

This agreement would kick off discussions to unblock shipping through the strait, lift US sanctions on Iran and set curbs on Iran’s nuclear programme, the sources said.

Al Jazeera, however, could not confirm the veracity of the reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/7/what-are-us-proposals-to-end-war-and-will-iran-agree-to-them?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.