Connect with us

உலகம்

Lebanon hopes crunch talks in Washington will halt an Israeli invasion

Published

on

What will Israel and Lebanon discuss in Washington, as Hezbollah and Israel continue to battle in south Lebanon.

Beirut, Lebanon – On Tuesday, representatives from Lebanon and Israel met at the US Department of State in Washington, DC – the first session of a two-day round of negotiations that Lebanese negotiators hope will end an invasion of their country.

The negotiations, which started at 9am local time (13:00 GMT), come as Israel’s invasion of Lebanon pushes deeper than at any point since the year 2000 and as Hezbollah and Israel continue to trade attacks. Israel has killed 3,468 people in Lebanon since March 2, according to Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health.

With the war raging on, what do Lebanon and Israel have to discuss and will the talks lead to an end of the Israeli assault?

Similar to past meetings, the two sides are ostensibly looking to come to some kind of deal following fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, with strong doubts it will be achieved.

Lebanon’s government is still pushing for a total ceasefire. However, as talks started, Israel was striking various parts of southern Lebanon. Lebanon is also trying to get Israel to withdraw from Lebanese territory in the south, so that more than 1.2 million displaced people can return home, and so the state can resume finding a way to disarm Hezbollah and rebuild areas devastated by Israeli attacks.

Israel is meanwhile looking to get assurances that Lebanon will disarm Hezbollah, a prospect analysts say Israel knows is complicated by the continuation of its military operations and occupation of swaths of southern Lebanon. Instead, Israel appears to be trying to fuel sectarian tensions inside Lebanon, leading to chaos and internal strife.

An initial meeting took place in April between Israel and Lebanon’s ambassadors to the United States. A second round took place in May with a larger delegation on both sides.

On Friday, a meeting took place with Lebanese and Israeli military representatives, while Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese group, is not involved in the meetings.

Israel claimed the two sides found common ground in that they both wanted to see Hezbollah disarmed. Some Israeli officials suggested there may soon be trade agreements and an exchange of tourists between the two countries. Lebanon, however, said it preferred to find a deal closer to the 1949 armistice agreement between the two countries.

In the last meeting, Beirut reportedly outlined the damage done by Israeli attacks since the 2024 ceasefire agreement and presented detailed maps showing homes destroyed or razed by Israel.

That remains to be seen, but for now, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country’s military would continue attacking Lebanon.

On Monday, Netanyahu announced that attacks on Beirut’s southern suburbs would resume, despite a ceasefire. Apart from two targeted attacks, Israel has not struck the suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, since April.

Iran, which has attempted to include Lebanon in a wider ceasefire between themselves, on one side, and Israel and the US on the other, then intervened by threatening to attack northern Israel.

US President Donald Trump reportedly intervened to stop Israel’s attacks. He announced another ceasefire, after his previous announcement of one between Israel and Lebanon on April 16, after claiming he had gotten the approval of Netanyahu and spoken to Hezbollah.

“There will be no troops going to Beirut, and any troops that are on their way have already been turned back,” Trump announced on his social media platform, Truth Social.

But attacks from Israel and Hezbollah are continuing.

Some Lebanese support the talks and say they are the only option the state, which has little leverage, has. Among those who believe direct talks are the best way forward are Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam.

“There is no option other than negotiation,” Aoun said in a statement on Tuesday.

Others, however, oppose direct talks. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and his allies, Hezbollah, have said indirect talks are preferred and that negotiations cannot be conducted while attacks are ongoing.

Israel and the US attacked Iran on February 28, killing the country’s longtime leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Iran is Hezbollah’s primary benefactor, and two days after Khamenei’s assassination, Hezbollah fired six rockets towards Israel on 2 March.

Hezbollah’s response brought a huge response from Israel, who have crossed the Litani River – the supposed buzzer zone in southern Lebanon it had created – towards the Zahrani River.

Despite a 2024 ceasefire, Israel had never stopped attacking Lebanon, while Hezbollah had only responded once in December 2024.

Iran has attempted to include Lebanon in the ceasefire deal it has with the United States and Israel, who say this theatre is not part of the agreement.

Although Trump has now announced a ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel twice, the invasion of southern Lebanon continues.

Gulf states have also intervened. Saudi Arabia has been working behind the scenes to get Lebanon’s leadership – Aoun, Salam and Berri – on the same page. Meanwhile, analysts say Saudi Arabia and Qatar engaged the Trump administration to stop an escalation in Lebanon.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/2/lebanon-hopes-crunch-talks-in-washington-will-halt-an-israeli-invasion?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

UK-China ‘ice age’ thaws: Why the West needs Beijing

Published

on

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper hails ‘candour and respect’ in new ties with Beijing, despite differences.

Eight years after a British prime minister and foreign secretary made back-to-back visits to China, the Keir Starmer government is once again trying to reset relations with Beijing after a long period of what Starmer had in January described as an “ice age” in relations.

Prime Minister Starmer went to Beijing in January, and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper is currently visiting on a three-day trip, as the United Kingdom and China try to revive economic and diplomatic ties despite lingering differences over security, human rights and the Russian war on Ukraine. Former PM Theresa May and her Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt made similar visits to China soon after each other in 2018.

The UK isn’t alone. Cooper’s visit to Beijing this week is the latest in a string of visits by global leaders and officials seemingly eager to engage with the second-largest economy in the world at a time of heightened global instability.

During her trip so far, Cooper has called for the two nations to work together to confront a host of global challenges, including conflicts in Iran and Ukraine and the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

“It is in our shared interest to have a rules-based international order and to find ways to reduce rising geoeconomic tensions,” the foreign secretary said on Tuesday as she met Chinese Vice President Han Zheng at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People at the start of her visit.

While acknowledging “areas of disagreement” between London and Beijing, Cooper insisted that approaching discussions with “candour and respect” would help to increase mutual understanding.

“Those frank and constructive discussions can help us make meaningful progress for the benefit of our two countries and the wider world,” she said.

The rhetoric about a “rules-based order” comes at a time when, under President Donald Trump, the United States – the country that led the creation of the post-World War II global architecture – increasingly faces accusations of ripping apart the international laws that were its foundation. China has in recent years positioned itself as a grown-up, responsible and stable global power, in contrast to the US.

But behind Cooper’s comments, say analysts, is also a deeper, more pragmatic acknowledgement: Western nations like the UK need China now more than ever.

The West has come to rely heavily on China, especially when it comes to the production of advanced goods – like semiconductors, medical instruments and aerospace components – as well as its stranglehold on many of the earth’s critical natural resources required to manufacture them all, said John Minnich, assistant professor in the Department of International Relations at the London School of Economics.

“This dependence is growing by the day,” Minnich told Al Jazeera. “Whether this is a good thing for the West or this trajectory is politically sustainable is another matter.”

Getting on a better footing with Beijing is a priority now, say observers. “The UK cannot afford a purely adversarial relationship with China,” Jing Gu, director of the Centre for Rising Powers and Global Development at the Institute of Development Studies in the UK, said.

“It’s a pragmatic response to the UK’s own global economic position and needs, and to the changing winds of US-China relations under the second Trump administration,” Minnich said.

This rapprochement has been in the works since the UK’s governing Labour party swept to power in July 2024. Former Foreign Secretary David Lammy travelled to China for a two-day diplomatic trip in October that year, as part of initial efforts to thaw what Starmer would dub a diplomatic “ice age” between the two countries. Starmer’s own trip in January, to meet President Xi Jinping, laid the groundwork for deeper economic engagement, including a $15bn investment by British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca and visa-free travel for Britons.

On Tuesday, China’s Vice President Han gave Cooper a warm welcome, along with a cultural visit to the Forbidden City, where she was shown around the world’s largest imperial palace complex by a tour guide before meeting her counterpart, Wang Yi, for talks at Diaoyutai State Guesthouse.

In his address at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People, Han stressed the need to “intensify interactions and strengthen dialogue and cooperation for the sake of world peace and stability and for the growth of our respective economies”.

“Currently, the ongoing geopolitical conflicts are dealing a heavy blow to world peace and stability and affecting the prospect of the world economy,” he continued. Addressing Cooper, he said her visit would help “move our relations steadily forward along the strategic direction established by the leaders of our two countries”.

It’s not just the UK. A growing number of Western countries are seeking to reset ties with China at a time when global geopolitical tensions are causing havoc with supply chains and huge market volatility. This year, leaders and officials from the US, Ireland, Spain, Germany, Canada and Finland are just a number of those who have travelled to China in a flurry of diplomatic engagement.

US President Donald Trump’s trip to China last month signalled a shift in direction after last year’s “trade war”, in which the two sides slapped each other with tit-for-tat tariffs and China threatened to restrict exports of most of its rare-earth metals. Those tensions had been rising since Trump’s first term as president until he and Xi called a temporary truce late last year to allow for trade talks.

Also notable, however, was that Washington’s rapprochement with Beijing coincided with a tense period in US-UK relations.

Trump publicly took Starmer to task over his refusal to assist in the US-Israel war on Iran or to send naval backup to help the US reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz. Similarly, Trump’s outbursts over the Western response to the war generally have depicted the EU as a foe and NATO as obsolete.

For the UK, Trump’s unpredictability is what has tipped the balance in favour of reinforcing bilateral cooperation with Beijing, as Britain struggles with sluggish economic growth and global energy price shocks triggered by the war on Iran.

And there is “plenty of room for mutual beneficial economic cooperation” between the two countries, Minnich said. “The UK is unusual among major Western countries in that its economic strengths complement rather than compete with China’s.

“Unlike Germany, the UK is not heavily dependent on high-value-added manufacturing, where China is increasingly competitive. Instead, it specialises in things like high-value financial and other services in which China remains relatively weak,” he added.

Cooper is expected to fly to Shenzhen, a major technology hub, to discuss trade links as well as “the challenges of the future of AI as it rapidly changes our world”. This is significant because China is outpacing almost every country in the world in producing ideas and innovation in areas that matter to the UK, including renewable energy.

Last year, the UK and China signed a partnership agreement on clean energy covering academic, regulatory, industrial and commercial partnerships. During Starmer’s visit to China earlier this year, the prime minister announced that Octopus Energy, the UK’s largest electricity supplier by market share, had formed a joint venture with China’s PCG Power to trade renewable energy in the Asian country.

Access to affordable, clean technology – which China has bundles of – could help the UK reduce the cost of decarbonisation and accelerate the energy transition. “But this cannot mean passive dependence,” Gu, at the Institute of Development Studies, said. “Middle powers such as the UK are not simply choosing sides; they are trying to buy time – time to support growth, accelerate the green transition, re

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/3/uk-china-ice-age-thaws-why-the-west-needs-beijing?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Hezbollah video shows attack on Israeli troops at Lebanon’s Beaufort Castle

Published

on

Hezbollah video shows attack on Israeli troops at Lebanon’s Beaufort Castle

Hezbollah has released drone video showing attacks targeting Israeli forces occupying Beaufort Castle in southern Lebanon. Israeli troops seized the medieval fortress on May 31.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/3/hezbollah-video-shows-attack-on-israeli-troops-at-lebanons-beaufort-castle?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

How social media changes the way we see war

Published

on

We see war now as we see everything else – through a screen. Genocide, displacement and mass violence are livestreamed to our phones, tucked between cat videos and advertisements for products designed to distract us.

We don’t choose to be spectators, we become them almost unconsciously – scrolling, watching and moving on. In the age of digital spectatorship, the key question is no longer whether we see human suffering, but what, if anything, we choose to do once we have.

Join Ali Rae in Episode Five of All Hail The Military – a five-part series that reveals the systems, power and hidden complicities that sustain global militarism – and the profound impact it has on us all.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/all-hail/2026/6/3/how-social-media-changes-the-way-we-see-war?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.