Connect with us

உலகம்

Gold is unaffordable so South Asian brides turn to one gram substitutes

Published

on

Families choose imitation jewellery and gold-plated ornaments as record prices push pure gold jewelry out of reach.

Srinagar, Indian-administered Kashmir – Uzma Bashir sleeps most nights with her phone beside her pillow. She often wakes, not to check her messages, but she is getting married in the summer and is monitoring the price of gold.

“In [Indian-administered] Kashmir, gold is not just an ornament, it is dignity. It determines how you will be treated in your in-laws’ home,” said the 29-year-old, an accountant at a consultancy firm in the region’s main city of Srinagar.

Bashir makes less than $100 a month. She had hoped to buy her wedding jewellery with her own earnings to avoid burdening her parents.

Across South Asia, where patriarchy often defines weddings, gold has long travelled with a bride into her new home, not just as an ornament, but also as protection from harassment – and even violence – as in-laws often demand a hefty dowry from the bride’s family.

“How much gold a woman owns often becomes equal to how she will be valued,” Bashir told Al Jazeera. “My parents have already done enough for me. But I can’t afford even a single ring. It costs nearly three months of my salary”.

Record gold prices this year have hit jewellery purchases across South Asia, with the precious metal hitting a high of $5,595 per ounce on January 29 and currently trading at around $4,861.

As India – the world’s second-largest consumer of gold – last weekend celebrated the popular gold-buying Hindu festival of Akshaya Tritiya, gold futures closed at $1,670 per 10 grams – 63 percent higher than last year’s festival.

The World Gold Council says demand for gold jewellery in India fell by 24 percent in 2025 compared to the year before.

The surge in prices has also affected the way people plan their weddings, as jewellers report more and more customers abandoning pure gold and turning instead to imitation jewellery, gold-plated ornaments or lower-carat alternatives.

Customers such as Uzma Bashir, who discovered a concept called “one-gram gold jewellery” – ornaments made from base metals but coated with a thin layer of 24-carat gold.

“For me, it has emerged as a lifesaver,” she said. “Now I can wear it on my wedding day and no one would point a finger”.

Many families across South Asia are also making that choice.

Fatima Begum, who lives in Laxmi Nagar, a dense working-class neighbourhood in New Delhi, is checking out stores at the bustling Karol Bagh market, where dozens of shops specialise in imitation jewellery.

The mother of five children is looking for a shop selling one-gram gold.

“How much gold can a middle-class family living in New Delhi really afford?” she asked. “My youngest daughter is getting married and I’m trying to reduce the cost of the wedding by replacing real gold jewellery with one-gram gold. I did the same when my eldest daughter got married”.

Fatima said when she got married in 1996, her father gave her nearly 60 grams of gold, apart from other gifts as part of her dowry. “Today, I cannot give even half of that to my daughters,” she told Al Jazeera. “I have given them some of my old jewellery along with a few one-gram pieces, so they won’t feel embarrassed at their own weddings”.

Shiv Yadav, a goldsmith working in Mumbai’s jewellery hub of Zaveri Bazaar for more than three decades, says the market today is increasingly dominated by artificial jewellery.

“If 10 people walk into the shop, only one ends up buying gold; the rest turn to artificial jewellery,” Yadav told Al Jazeera. “I had never seen such a dramatic shift”.

In neighbouring Bangladesh, similar economic pressures are redefining marriages. Last month, the price of 22-carat gold in Dhaka climbed to a record $2,200 per 11.668 gram (“bhori” in the local Bangla language), according to the Bangladesh Jewellers Association.

In a country with a per capita income of around $2,600, gold has simply become unaffordable for most people.

“I don’t think we can casually wear gold anymore, the way our mothers used to. It has simply become too expensive,” said Sadia Islam as she browsed shops in Dhaka’s Chawkbazar. It is a busy wholesale hub, where the Hazi Selim Tower alone houses more than 100 jewellery outlets.

Store owner Enayet Hossain said demand for imitation jewellery has grown sharply as gold becomes too expensive for most. Smaller imitation items such as earrings cost as little as 200 to 500 taka [$1.5-$4], while larger sets sell for a few thousand, depending on the design.

“Customers want pieces that look like real gold but cost much less, and the designs are often more varied than traditional jewellery,” he told Al Jazeera, adding that many of his products are imported from India, where imitation jewellery is a huge industry.

For Sadia Islam, safety is another reason to avoid wearing real gold.

“What if I wear real gold to a wedding and it gets stolen?” she asked. “I can’t take that risk”.

Instead, she buys imitation jewellery to match specific outfits for family events. “So before family functions, I come to these shops to buy imitation jewellery that matches my clothes,” she said. “I feel much safer wearing it”.

In Pakistan too, jewellers say pure gold jewellery is increasingly becoming a luxury reserved mainly for the wealthy.

Traders say sales of gold jewellery have fallen by about 50 percent over the past year. As prices increase, many customers have turned to lower-carat options, such as 18 or 12-carat gold.

Others are abandoning gold altogether in favour of gold-plated jewellery.

“It’s not that we don’t want to wear real gold. Of course we do,” said Ayesha Khan as she shopped for jewellery for a family wedding. “But the circumstances in Pakistan are very difficult right now”.

Gold prices have reached around 540,000 Pakistani rupees ($1,938) per tola (11.668 grams). “That makes it impossible for ordinary families to buy jewellery the way people used to,” Khan told Al Jazeera.

Imitation jewellery, she added, allows families to preserve the appearance of tradition without the financial burden. “It lets us still look elegant at weddings without spending a fortune”.

The price difference is stark. A gold-plated bridal set can cost between 40,000-60,000 Pakistani rupees ($143-215). The same design made from real gold can cost hundreds of thousands or even millions of rupees.

Back in Indian-administered Kashmir, Shabana Khan and her fiancé Shahbaaz Khan confront the same reality. Their wedding is expected in two months.

“I always dreamed of wedding jewellery,” said Shabana from the remote Kupwara district. “But real gold is too expensive”.

Shahbaaz says Shabana had always imagined wearing a heavy necklace on her wedding day. “But I cannot spend $6,000 to $7,000 on gold jewellery,” he told Al Jazeera.

After the couple came across social media videos offering “one-gram gold jewellery”, they travelled to Srinagar, around 85km (53 miles) away, to visit a showroom there.

“The jewellery looked just like real gold,” Shahbaaz said. “At least with this concept, she can enjoy her dream”.

But one-gram gold jewellery doesn’t work for everyone.

Rihanna Ashraf, 40, grew up in a family of artisans that survived on traditional embroidery work. After her father died when she was still a child, she started supporting her widowed mother and four siblings.

Meanwhile, marriage proposals came but often ended in the same manner.

“One family agreed,” she told Al Jazeera. “My mother was so happy. But when we met them, they demanded gold worth more than everything we had. The proposal fell through”.

Rihanna says she has heard of one-gram gold. “But what is the benefit? It is not pure. It does not feel authentic”.

She remains unmarried, like nearly 50,000 women in Srinagar alone who are considered “past their marriage age”, according to community leaders, as financial barriers, mainly gold, play a key role.

Nisar Ahmad Bhat, who runs a jewellery store in Srinagar, said attitu

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/24/south-asias-gold-obsession-faces-soaring-price-challenges-at-weddings?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Police in Belfast use water cannon as anti-immigrant unrest continues

Published

on

Clashes come as family of knife attack victim calls for calm and condemns violence targeting immigrants.

Unrest in Northern Ireland: Second day of anti-immigration protests in Belfast

Police in the United Kingdom city of Belfast have used water cannon to disperse dozens of far-right protesters during a second night of unrest triggered by a knife attack involving a Sudanese refugee.

The clashes on Wednesday came as the family of the stabbing victim appealed for calm and condemned the wave of anti-immigrant violence in the city in Northern Ireland.

Police said the protesters threw “missiles” such as rocks and bottles at officers, while images from the scene showed several fires burning on the streets.

Police said officers deployed “water cannon in an attempt to maintain public order”.

But the unrest was markedly less severe than on Tuesday evening, when hundreds of masked men burned families out of their homes and set vehicles alight.

“We want to make it absolutely clear that overnight unrest is not welcome, and peaceful protest is the only way forward,” the family of the victim, Stephen Ogilvie, said in a statement.

“We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country… We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility,” it said.

The family added that Ogilvie, who lost an eye and suffered serious wounds to his neck and face, was in a stable condition.

Their appeal came as the suspect in the attack, a 30-year-old ‌Sudanese national named Hadi Alodid, appeared in court on charges including attempted murder.

He was remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to July 8.

Videos of the stabbing attack circulated online all day on Tuesday, sparking calls on social media for violent protest. Police had to help one family escape from a burning house, according to the Reuters news agency, while several cars and a bus were set on fire and reduced to shells.

Local politicians and a pastor said many of those targeted were Black.

UK minister Ruth Anderson said at least 27 people were made homeless in Belfast “because people went door-to-door to try and target foreign nationals”.

Resident Jamie Corry, 33, said he could only watch on as his house went up in flames.

“I was actually standing right there watching my whole house just go up, slowly but surely,” he told Reuters. “I told them and all, when they were lighting a car up on fire, ‘that’s my property, that’s my property’… and they still didn’t care.”

The attack comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted many messages that blamed migration on violence in the UK, sharing a post that argued that the “very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and open borders” is increasing tensions.

Amid calls from Musk, other far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson called for more protests on Wednesday, Northern Ireland’s police chief said ⁠an extra 200 officers were being deployed on the streets.

“These idiots didn’t just target ethnic minority groups… they targeted society,” Chief ⁠Constable Jon Boutcher said of Tuesday night’s rioters.

Officers had to take a family that included a two-month-old baby to safety during Tuesday’s violence, which he branded “a huge act of self-harm by mindless idiots”.

Speaking in London, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the knife attack raised serious questions, but that “driving people out of their homes is not … the right way to respond”.

He condemned the unrest as “shocking and completely unacceptable”.

Anna Turley, the chairwoman of the UK’s governing Labour Party, meanwhile, said that online platforms were “playing a role in driving” the unrest and suggested Musk was one of the “bad faith actors” inflaming tensions.

The United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned what he called “incitement” on social media. “Dehumanisation of whole groups within a society is totally unacceptable and frankly despicable,” he told reporters in Geneva, adding that the violence in both Northern Ireland and Southampton had been “really shocking”.

Social media providers, he insisted, must take seriously their responsibility to prevent hate speech and incitement to violence.

Immigration has historically been low in Northern Ireland, partly due to the three-decade conflict between mainly Catholic Irish nationalists seeking Irish unity and predominantly Protestant pro-British “loyalists” wanting to stay in the UK and the British military.

However, migration has increased in recent years, and there has been an increasing sentiment against it in both Northern Ireland and parts of the Republic of Ireland.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/police-in-belfast-use-water-cannon-as-anti-immigrant-unrest-continues?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Published

on

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Defiant crowds of Hezbollah supporters rallied in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighbourhood to support Iran’s role in standing against Israel, and rejecting efforts to separate Lebanon’s war from Iran’s. Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/11/dahiyeh-crowds-rally-in-favour-of-iranian-support-against-israel?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

OpenAI says China-based actors stoking opposition to AI data centres

Published

on

AI company says ChatGPT accounts sought to ‘exploit and amplify existing public concerns’ about energy prices.

China-based actors are likely behind the use of ChatGPT for “covert influence operations” aimed at stoking opposition to data centres in the United States, OpenAI has said.

In a research report released on Wednesday, the company behind the world’s most popular AI chatbot said it had banned a cluster of accounts likely based in China for attempting to “manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI”.

OpenAI, whose release of ChatGPT in 2022 kicked off a global frenzy around AI, said the accounts were used to generate social media comments and images that blamed data centres for rising electricity prices in communities across the US.

Among other content, the accounts generated a comic strip showing a cigar-chomping businessman holding bags marked with dollar signs as a family reacted in shock to their electricity bill, according to the San Francisco-based company.

OpenAI said a second cluster of accounts had generated content casting US tariffs as an effort to “dominate technological competition” with China, and specified that the material should not mention Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While the campaign sought to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” about energy prices, OpenAI found no evidence that it had a “meaningful” influence, the company said.

“Foreign influence operations have long sought to latch onto existing local issues and sincerely held beliefs, using them to build credibility, amplify divisions or exacerbate public distrust,” the ChatGPT creator said.

“In this case, the operators attempted to covertly insert themselves into an ongoing American debate about the future of the country’s AI capabilities while hiding who they were and what motivated them.”

China’s embassy in Washington, DC, said it was not familiar with the report but that it opposed “any groundless attacks or smears against China”.

“AI is profoundly changing the way people work and live. It is a new frontier for all humanity,” an embassy spokesperson said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.

“China believes in a people-centered approach to AI and advocates openness and inclusiveness to ensure AI is a force for good and for all.”

OpenAI is the latest prominent voice to suggest foreign influence could be behind opposition to AI in the US.

In May, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum told a policy event hosted by Breitbart News that the public’s increasingly negative sentiment towards the construction of data centres was not “organic” and could, in some cases, be linked to “foreign-sourced dark money”.

Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina, who studies foreign influence campaigns, expressed doubt that the campaign identified by OpenAI or any other coordinated effort would have much impact on the “volume or tone” of the public debate.

“My team is very familiar with the work of various Chinese influence actors, and the AI work China has done to date has been interesting but not effective,” Linvill told Al Jazeera.

“It’s getting better with each passing month, and I’m concerned what they may be capable of in the future, but they aren’t there yet.”

“If China were really serious about meaningfully influencing the discourse around data centres using AI chat bots, I question if they would use OpenAI to do it,” Linvill added.

Opposition to the construction of data centres has been on the rise in the US, with at least 36 projects blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, according to Data Center Watch, a research project by AI security company 10a Labs.

In March, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced legislation that would impose a moratorium on new data centres until the introduction of national safeguards to mitigate the risks of AI.

The legislation has little chance of becoming law in the near future due to US President Donald Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and Republicans’ control of both chambers of Congress.

Opposition to data centres has been driven in part by the huge amounts of energy they consume supporting the computing power needed to train and run AI models such as ChatGPT.

The facilities accounted for 1.5 percent of global electricity use in 2024, with consumption growing 12 percent annually over the last five years, according to the International Energy Agency.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/11/openai-says-china-based-actors-stoking-opposition-to-ai-data-centres?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.