Connect with us

உலகம்

US plans to hike tariffs on EU cars to 25% will hit luxury market the most

Published

on

US says it will hike tariffs to 25 percent because the EU has not complied with a trade deal last year that set tariffs at 15 percent.

The United States is set to impose 25 percent tariffs on the European Union’s auto sector, a move that would reverse an agreement reached in August between Washington and the bloc.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC on Monday that the White House is “moving forward with this action”.

Earlier this year, the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump could not impose his global tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), limiting the president’s sweeping global tariffs.

However, last year, Trump imposed a 25 percent tariff on global automotive imports under Section 232, citing national security risks. In August, the White House reached a deal with the EU to lower those levies to 15 percent.

“He does have authority to do this. What’s less clear is what the US issue is. Europe had needed EU-level implementation of the agreement, which delayed some implementation,” Rachel Ziemba, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told Al Jazeera.

Trump claimed that the bloc had not complied with the deal — an assertion EU officials rejected. Trump accused the countries of violating the agreement after a slate of European countries declined to send their militaries to help the US Navy open the Strait of Hormuz.

“This threat is a negotiating tactic, of course. However, the US leverage is somewhat less after the IEEPA tariff rulings,” said Ziemba.

Trump’s tariff threats would impact German car companies hardest as BMW, Mercedes, and Volkswagen maintain a large US presence.

This comes as the White House announced plans on Friday to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany after Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the US was being “humiliated” in negotiations with Iran.

European carmakers would be hit by tariffs. Car trade is a significant portion of EU-US business, making up 8 percent of all trade, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), and the US is the number one destination for EU-built cars, accounting for 29 percent of the total EU export value.

“The Trump administration continues to use coercive threats. In this case, it would be Germany that would be hardest hit by the tariffs because of the importance of its car industry. Europe so far has yet to push back on Trump’s tariffs, in large part because of security concerns,” Gregory Shaffer, professor of international law at Georgetown University, told Al Jazeera.

The tariffs would mostly hit higher-end and luxury vehicles.

“It [the tariffs] has more impact on higher-end cars since those are the ones primarily imported as finished items. European automakers tend to produce mid-level cars in the US given the USMCA-related incentives,” Ziemba said, referring to the trade agreement between the US, Mexico and Canada that exempts qualifying goods from tariffs.

Germany’s Volkswagen is among the carmakers with a significant presence in the US. The company operates a major production facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee, where it builds the Atlas, Atlas Cross Sport, and Volkswagen ID.4. Its Golf models are produced in Wolfsburg, Germany.

It is still unclear how the car companies will respond.

“We’re reviewing the recent tariff action and waiting for additional details,” a spokesperson for Volkswagen told Al Jazeera.

Mercedes-Benz also maintains a US manufacturing footprint, producing many of its SUV models at a plant in Alabama. However, several of its sedans — including the Mercedes-Benz S-Class — are still manufactured in Germany.

Similarly, BMW builds its X series SUVs at a large facility in Spartanburg, South Carolina. Other models, such as the 3 Series and 4 Series, are primarily produced in Germany.

BMW did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

Mercedes referred Al Jazeera to the ACEA, but the association did not respond to a request for comment.

Stellantis also has some exposure. While it produces Jeep, Ram, and Chrysler vehicles stateside, it produces brands like Fiat and Peugeot in Europe. Fiat has a limited presence in the US, and Peugeot has none.

Some brands are more exposed to tariffs than others, particularly at the higher end of the market. Porsche and Audi — both owned by Volkswagen — do not manufacture vehicles in the US.

Following the United Kingdom, the US is still the largest market for EU auto exports, and 25 percent of US global car imports by value are from the EU, according to the ACEA, which puts pressure on automotive manufacturers to reconsider their strategies.

In March, Automotive News reported that Porsche was considering expanding production to the US to offset the potential impact of tariffs.

Ultra-luxury brands face even greater exposure, including Ferrari and Lamborghini. The two brands produce all of their vehicles in Italy.

It would also impact companies that make parts created in the US, including manufacturers that make clutches, emissions and engine parts, according to Kyle Peacock, who runs Peacock Tariff Consulting.

“Manufacturing plants that produce them overseas have stopped or slowed ordering materials from the US, so they’re ramping down production because they anticipate their volume is out of sync on these products due to the additional tariffs,” Peacock said.

“One of our clients produces clutches for Stellantis and Volkswagen that they ship to Germany and the UK for production. We’ve seen those sales slow down because they don’t anticipate bringing those products into the US.”

Trump’s tariffs have cost US families an average tax increase of $1,000 per household, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. Since the change in tariffs on the back of the Supreme Court ruling, that is expected to drop to $700 per US household for this year.

With mid-range and high-end vehicles predominantly affected, the hit to consumers would be limited.

“So this will be, from my understanding, passed directly onto the consumer, more so than some of the other tariff initiatives that have happened in the past, due to the fact that the individuals buying these vehicles are more able to absorb the tariff than lower-income consumers or those affected by previous tariffs,” Peacock said.

“Corporations won’t eat these tariffs; they’ll just pass them directly on to the consumers, [is] my indication from clients,” he said.

Politically, tariffs have weighed on consumers. A Harris Poll in March found that 72 percent of Americans said that tariffs had a negative impact on their lives, and that was echoed by a Pew Research Center poll in April, which found that 63 percent of Americans are not confident in Trump’s handling of tariff policy.

“At some point, however, there will be a tipping point where Europe would retaliate, aiming to hurt Trump by targeting US exports from key swing states,” Georgetown University’s Shaffer said.

Peacock says that in his consultancy, European automakers like Volkswagen have been more hesitant to buy with US producers, many of which are in swing states like Virginia and New Jersey.

The White House did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/5/5/us-plans-to-hike-tariffs-on-eu-cars-to-25-will-hit-luxury-market-the-most?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Police in Belfast use water cannon as anti-immigrant unrest continues

Published

on

Clashes come as family of knife attack victim calls for calm and condemns violence targeting immigrants.

Unrest in Northern Ireland: Second day of anti-immigration protests in Belfast

Police in the United Kingdom city of Belfast have used water cannon to disperse dozens of far-right protesters during a second night of unrest triggered by a knife attack involving a Sudanese refugee.

The clashes on Wednesday came as the family of the stabbing victim appealed for calm and condemned the wave of anti-immigrant violence in the city in Northern Ireland.

Police said the protesters threw “missiles” such as rocks and bottles at officers, while images from the scene showed several fires burning on the streets.

Police said officers deployed “water cannon in an attempt to maintain public order”.

But the unrest was markedly less severe than on Tuesday evening, when hundreds of masked men burned families out of their homes and set vehicles alight.

“We want to make it absolutely clear that overnight unrest is not welcome, and peaceful protest is the only way forward,” the family of the victim, Stephen Ogilvie, said in a statement.

“We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country… We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility,” it said.

The family added that Ogilvie, who lost an eye and suffered serious wounds to his neck and face, was in a stable condition.

Their appeal came as the suspect in the attack, a 30-year-old ‌Sudanese national named Hadi Alodid, appeared in court on charges including attempted murder.

He was remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to July 8.

Videos of the stabbing attack circulated online all day on Tuesday, sparking calls on social media for violent protest. Police had to help one family escape from a burning house, according to the Reuters news agency, while several cars and a bus were set on fire and reduced to shells.

Local politicians and a pastor said many of those targeted were Black.

UK minister Ruth Anderson said at least 27 people were made homeless in Belfast “because people went door-to-door to try and target foreign nationals”.

Resident Jamie Corry, 33, said he could only watch on as his house went up in flames.

“I was actually standing right there watching my whole house just go up, slowly but surely,” he told Reuters. “I told them and all, when they were lighting a car up on fire, ‘that’s my property, that’s my property’… and they still didn’t care.”

The attack comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted many messages that blamed migration on violence in the UK, sharing a post that argued that the “very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and open borders” is increasing tensions.

Amid calls from Musk, other far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson called for more protests on Wednesday, Northern Ireland’s police chief said ⁠an extra 200 officers were being deployed on the streets.

“These idiots didn’t just target ethnic minority groups… they targeted society,” Chief ⁠Constable Jon Boutcher said of Tuesday night’s rioters.

Officers had to take a family that included a two-month-old baby to safety during Tuesday’s violence, which he branded “a huge act of self-harm by mindless idiots”.

Speaking in London, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the knife attack raised serious questions, but that “driving people out of their homes is not … the right way to respond”.

He condemned the unrest as “shocking and completely unacceptable”.

Anna Turley, the chairwoman of the UK’s governing Labour Party, meanwhile, said that online platforms were “playing a role in driving” the unrest and suggested Musk was one of the “bad faith actors” inflaming tensions.

The United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned what he called “incitement” on social media. “Dehumanisation of whole groups within a society is totally unacceptable and frankly despicable,” he told reporters in Geneva, adding that the violence in both Northern Ireland and Southampton had been “really shocking”.

Social media providers, he insisted, must take seriously their responsibility to prevent hate speech and incitement to violence.

Immigration has historically been low in Northern Ireland, partly due to the three-decade conflict between mainly Catholic Irish nationalists seeking Irish unity and predominantly Protestant pro-British “loyalists” wanting to stay in the UK and the British military.

However, migration has increased in recent years, and there has been an increasing sentiment against it in both Northern Ireland and parts of the Republic of Ireland.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/police-in-belfast-use-water-cannon-as-anti-immigrant-unrest-continues?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Published

on

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Defiant crowds of Hezbollah supporters rallied in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighbourhood to support Iran’s role in standing against Israel, and rejecting efforts to separate Lebanon’s war from Iran’s. Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/11/dahiyeh-crowds-rally-in-favour-of-iranian-support-against-israel?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

OpenAI says China-based actors stoking opposition to AI data centres

Published

on

AI company says ChatGPT accounts sought to ‘exploit and amplify existing public concerns’ about energy prices.

China-based actors are likely behind the use of ChatGPT for “covert influence operations” aimed at stoking opposition to data centres in the United States, OpenAI has said.

In a research report released on Wednesday, the company behind the world’s most popular AI chatbot said it had banned a cluster of accounts likely based in China for attempting to “manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI”.

OpenAI, whose release of ChatGPT in 2022 kicked off a global frenzy around AI, said the accounts were used to generate social media comments and images that blamed data centres for rising electricity prices in communities across the US.

Among other content, the accounts generated a comic strip showing a cigar-chomping businessman holding bags marked with dollar signs as a family reacted in shock to their electricity bill, according to the San Francisco-based company.

OpenAI said a second cluster of accounts had generated content casting US tariffs as an effort to “dominate technological competition” with China, and specified that the material should not mention Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While the campaign sought to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” about energy prices, OpenAI found no evidence that it had a “meaningful” influence, the company said.

“Foreign influence operations have long sought to latch onto existing local issues and sincerely held beliefs, using them to build credibility, amplify divisions or exacerbate public distrust,” the ChatGPT creator said.

“In this case, the operators attempted to covertly insert themselves into an ongoing American debate about the future of the country’s AI capabilities while hiding who they were and what motivated them.”

China’s embassy in Washington, DC, said it was not familiar with the report but that it opposed “any groundless attacks or smears against China”.

“AI is profoundly changing the way people work and live. It is a new frontier for all humanity,” an embassy spokesperson said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.

“China believes in a people-centered approach to AI and advocates openness and inclusiveness to ensure AI is a force for good and for all.”

OpenAI is the latest prominent voice to suggest foreign influence could be behind opposition to AI in the US.

In May, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum told a policy event hosted by Breitbart News that the public’s increasingly negative sentiment towards the construction of data centres was not “organic” and could, in some cases, be linked to “foreign-sourced dark money”.

Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina, who studies foreign influence campaigns, expressed doubt that the campaign identified by OpenAI or any other coordinated effort would have much impact on the “volume or tone” of the public debate.

“My team is very familiar with the work of various Chinese influence actors, and the AI work China has done to date has been interesting but not effective,” Linvill told Al Jazeera.

“It’s getting better with each passing month, and I’m concerned what they may be capable of in the future, but they aren’t there yet.”

“If China were really serious about meaningfully influencing the discourse around data centres using AI chat bots, I question if they would use OpenAI to do it,” Linvill added.

Opposition to the construction of data centres has been on the rise in the US, with at least 36 projects blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, according to Data Center Watch, a research project by AI security company 10a Labs.

In March, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced legislation that would impose a moratorium on new data centres until the introduction of national safeguards to mitigate the risks of AI.

The legislation has little chance of becoming law in the near future due to US President Donald Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and Republicans’ control of both chambers of Congress.

Opposition to data centres has been driven in part by the huge amounts of energy they consume supporting the computing power needed to train and run AI models such as ChatGPT.

The facilities accounted for 1.5 percent of global electricity use in 2024, with consumption growing 12 percent annually over the last five years, according to the International Energy Agency.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/11/openai-says-china-based-actors-stoking-opposition-to-ai-data-centres?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.