Connect with us

உலகம்

Trump halts $1.8bn ‘anti-weaponisation’ fund amid bipartisan backlash

Published

on

The announcement comes after Trump met with congressional Republicans over concerns about his settlement with the IRS.

United States President Donald Trump will reportedly drop his $1.8bn “anti-weaponisation” fund amid congressional backlash, including from fellow Republicans.

On Monday, US media indicated the fund would be paused, though the White House has yet to publicly confirm the reports.

Axios was the first to break the news, citing an unnamed senior official. “It’s dead for now,” the official told the news outlet.

The “anti-weaponisation” fund was announced last month as part of a settlement between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), part of his executive branch.

According to documents released by the Department of Justice, the $1.8bn was slated to serve as payment for victims of “lawfare” and government “weaponisation”.

Trump himself has repeatedly painted himself as such a victim, framing himself and his allies as victims of unfair government prosecution.

Monday’s announcement came after Trump met with House Speaker Mike Johnson over Republican concerns about the “anti-weaponisation” fund.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has likewise called for the fund to be dropped, as he seeks to rally Republicans to pass a $72bn immigration enforcement funding bill.

Still, Democrats on the Senate floor argued that the reported pause did not go far enough.

“The press reports that Trump says he will table his $2bn MAGA slush fund,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said, using the acronym for Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement.

“But a promise from Trump is worthless. If Trump and Republicans are truly abandoning this corrupt scheme, they should have zero problem banning it in law.”

Schumer pledged to advance legislation to “ensure no president can ever do this again”.

Plans for the $1.8bn “anti-weaponisation” fund were revealed on May 18, shortly after Trump agreed to drop his case against the IRS.

Trump had filed the lawsuit in January, alleging that the IRS was responsible for the leak of his tax returns, information from which was published in The New York Times and ProPublica, starting in 2020.

The Republican leader sought $10bn in damages, though critics argued that the lawsuit faced an uphill battle.

There were questions about whether it fell within the statute of limitations and whether the IRS could be held responsible for the actions of an outside contractor, Charles Littlejohn, who was convicted of leaking the documents.

The lawsuit and the subsequent settlement also raised outcry over apparent conflicts of interest, since Trump was in charge of the IRS and the Department of Justice, which represented the tax agency in court hearings.

After announcing the lawsuit’s settlement in May, the Department of Justice revealed its plans to set up the fund.

An additional settlement document also was made public, saying Trump and his family would have lifelong immunity from any IRS audits.

While the Department of Justice had yet to outline who would be eligible for the “anti-weaponisation” fund, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has declined to rule out Trump supporters involved in the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

The “anti-weaponisation” fund has since been criticised as a piggy bank for payouts to Trump allies, and it has faced both legal and congressional pushback.

At least three separate lawsuits have been filed to stop the “anti-weaponisation” fund, including one filed by police officers injured in the January 6 attack.

Last week, a federal judge temporarily blocked the creation of the fund while the court reviewed the case.

The plaintiffs in that lawsuit were represented by the nonprofit Democracy Forward, and they included Andrew Floyd, a former federal prosecutor involved in January 6 cases.

The third lawsuit was led by the government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

All three legal complaints challenged the Trump administration’s legal authority to establish the fund, pointing to the president’s conflicts of interest.

Separately, the federal judge in Florida that was slated to hear Trump’s $10bn IRS complaint has reopened the case, citing details of the settlement that only became public after the case was dropped.

In response to reports that the “anti-weaponisation” fund had been paused, CREW issued a statement that it “never should’ve been proposed in the first place”.

“Trump’s reported temporary abandonment is not enough, and it does not resolve the legal issues raised in CREW’s case or others seeking to block the fund,” Nikhel Sus, CREW’s chief counsel, told Al Jazeera.

“We will continue pressing forward our case until the illegal fund is shuttered permanently.”

Al Jazeera reached out for comment to the White House, which responded by pointing to a post from the Department of Justice on social media, saying it would comply with the court ruling to pause the fund.

“This fund was open to anybody who was so weaponised, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise,” the Justice Department said in the post.

Even members of the Republican Party were sceptical of the “anti-weaponisation” fund and the settlement overall.

“It doesn’t look right,” Senator Don Bacon of Nebraska told KMTV in Omaha. “You can’t do it that way, when you’re negotiating with yourself for yourself.”

In an interview with CNN, another Republican, outgoing Senator Thom Tillis, called the fund “a payout pot for punks”.

Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana were also among the fund’s critics.

In a rare sign of Republican backlash, the Republican-led Senate last month delayed passing a $72bn funding bill for Trump’s immigration enforcement initiative, in part as a protest against the “anti-weaponisation” fund.

The $1.8bn used for the fund would have bypassed congressional approval, instead drawing from a pot of money used by the Justice Department to handle government settlements.

With reports emerging that the White House had agreed to suspend the “anti-weaponisation” fund, Senate Republicans signalled the $72bn in immigration funding would be put back on track.

But Democrats on the Senate floor on Monday continued to express outrage.

“The president wants to hand lofty payouts to his political buddies and the criminals who attacked our democracy at his request,” said Senator Dick Durbin. “It reeks of corruption.”

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/1/trump-halts-1-8bn-anti-weaponisation-fund-amid-bipartisan-backlash?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Police in Belfast use water cannon as anti-immigrant unrest continues

Published

on

Clashes come as family of knife attack victim calls for calm and condemns violence targeting immigrants.

Unrest in Northern Ireland: Second day of anti-immigration protests in Belfast

Police in the United Kingdom city of Belfast have used water cannon to disperse dozens of far-right protesters during a second night of unrest triggered by a knife attack involving a Sudanese refugee.

The clashes on Wednesday came as the family of the stabbing victim appealed for calm and condemned the wave of anti-immigrant violence in the city in Northern Ireland.

Police said the protesters threw “missiles” such as rocks and bottles at officers, while images from the scene showed several fires burning on the streets.

Police said officers deployed “water cannon in an attempt to maintain public order”.

But the unrest was markedly less severe than on Tuesday evening, when hundreds of masked men burned families out of their homes and set vehicles alight.

“We want to make it absolutely clear that overnight unrest is not welcome, and peaceful protest is the only way forward,” the family of the victim, Stephen Ogilvie, said in a statement.

“We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country… We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility,” it said.

The family added that Ogilvie, who lost an eye and suffered serious wounds to his neck and face, was in a stable condition.

Their appeal came as the suspect in the attack, a 30-year-old ‌Sudanese national named Hadi Alodid, appeared in court on charges including attempted murder.

He was remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to July 8.

Videos of the stabbing attack circulated online all day on Tuesday, sparking calls on social media for violent protest. Police had to help one family escape from a burning house, according to the Reuters news agency, while several cars and a bus were set on fire and reduced to shells.

Local politicians and a pastor said many of those targeted were Black.

UK minister Ruth Anderson said at least 27 people were made homeless in Belfast “because people went door-to-door to try and target foreign nationals”.

Resident Jamie Corry, 33, said he could only watch on as his house went up in flames.

“I was actually standing right there watching my whole house just go up, slowly but surely,” he told Reuters. “I told them and all, when they were lighting a car up on fire, ‘that’s my property, that’s my property’… and they still didn’t care.”

The attack comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted many messages that blamed migration on violence in the UK, sharing a post that argued that the “very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and open borders” is increasing tensions.

Amid calls from Musk, other far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson called for more protests on Wednesday, Northern Ireland’s police chief said ⁠an extra 200 officers were being deployed on the streets.

“These idiots didn’t just target ethnic minority groups… they targeted society,” Chief ⁠Constable Jon Boutcher said of Tuesday night’s rioters.

Officers had to take a family that included a two-month-old baby to safety during Tuesday’s violence, which he branded “a huge act of self-harm by mindless idiots”.

Speaking in London, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the knife attack raised serious questions, but that “driving people out of their homes is not … the right way to respond”.

He condemned the unrest as “shocking and completely unacceptable”.

Anna Turley, the chairwoman of the UK’s governing Labour Party, meanwhile, said that online platforms were “playing a role in driving” the unrest and suggested Musk was one of the “bad faith actors” inflaming tensions.

The United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned what he called “incitement” on social media. “Dehumanisation of whole groups within a society is totally unacceptable and frankly despicable,” he told reporters in Geneva, adding that the violence in both Northern Ireland and Southampton had been “really shocking”.

Social media providers, he insisted, must take seriously their responsibility to prevent hate speech and incitement to violence.

Immigration has historically been low in Northern Ireland, partly due to the three-decade conflict between mainly Catholic Irish nationalists seeking Irish unity and predominantly Protestant pro-British “loyalists” wanting to stay in the UK and the British military.

However, migration has increased in recent years, and there has been an increasing sentiment against it in both Northern Ireland and parts of the Republic of Ireland.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/police-in-belfast-use-water-cannon-as-anti-immigrant-unrest-continues?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Published

on

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Defiant crowds of Hezbollah supporters rallied in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighbourhood to support Iran’s role in standing against Israel, and rejecting efforts to separate Lebanon’s war from Iran’s. Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/11/dahiyeh-crowds-rally-in-favour-of-iranian-support-against-israel?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

OpenAI says China-based actors stoking opposition to AI data centres

Published

on

AI company says ChatGPT accounts sought to ‘exploit and amplify existing public concerns’ about energy prices.

China-based actors are likely behind the use of ChatGPT for “covert influence operations” aimed at stoking opposition to data centres in the United States, OpenAI has said.

In a research report released on Wednesday, the company behind the world’s most popular AI chatbot said it had banned a cluster of accounts likely based in China for attempting to “manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI”.

OpenAI, whose release of ChatGPT in 2022 kicked off a global frenzy around AI, said the accounts were used to generate social media comments and images that blamed data centres for rising electricity prices in communities across the US.

Among other content, the accounts generated a comic strip showing a cigar-chomping businessman holding bags marked with dollar signs as a family reacted in shock to their electricity bill, according to the San Francisco-based company.

OpenAI said a second cluster of accounts had generated content casting US tariffs as an effort to “dominate technological competition” with China, and specified that the material should not mention Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While the campaign sought to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” about energy prices, OpenAI found no evidence that it had a “meaningful” influence, the company said.

“Foreign influence operations have long sought to latch onto existing local issues and sincerely held beliefs, using them to build credibility, amplify divisions or exacerbate public distrust,” the ChatGPT creator said.

“In this case, the operators attempted to covertly insert themselves into an ongoing American debate about the future of the country’s AI capabilities while hiding who they were and what motivated them.”

China’s embassy in Washington, DC, said it was not familiar with the report but that it opposed “any groundless attacks or smears against China”.

“AI is profoundly changing the way people work and live. It is a new frontier for all humanity,” an embassy spokesperson said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.

“China believes in a people-centered approach to AI and advocates openness and inclusiveness to ensure AI is a force for good and for all.”

OpenAI is the latest prominent voice to suggest foreign influence could be behind opposition to AI in the US.

In May, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum told a policy event hosted by Breitbart News that the public’s increasingly negative sentiment towards the construction of data centres was not “organic” and could, in some cases, be linked to “foreign-sourced dark money”.

Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina, who studies foreign influence campaigns, expressed doubt that the campaign identified by OpenAI or any other coordinated effort would have much impact on the “volume or tone” of the public debate.

“My team is very familiar with the work of various Chinese influence actors, and the AI work China has done to date has been interesting but not effective,” Linvill told Al Jazeera.

“It’s getting better with each passing month, and I’m concerned what they may be capable of in the future, but they aren’t there yet.”

“If China were really serious about meaningfully influencing the discourse around data centres using AI chat bots, I question if they would use OpenAI to do it,” Linvill added.

Opposition to the construction of data centres has been on the rise in the US, with at least 36 projects blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, according to Data Center Watch, a research project by AI security company 10a Labs.

In March, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced legislation that would impose a moratorium on new data centres until the introduction of national safeguards to mitigate the risks of AI.

The legislation has little chance of becoming law in the near future due to US President Donald Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and Republicans’ control of both chambers of Congress.

Opposition to data centres has been driven in part by the huge amounts of energy they consume supporting the computing power needed to train and run AI models such as ChatGPT.

The facilities accounted for 1.5 percent of global electricity use in 2024, with consumption growing 12 percent annually over the last five years, according to the International Energy Agency.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/11/openai-says-china-based-actors-stoking-opposition-to-ai-data-centres?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.