Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

The friendlier the AI chatbot the more inaccurate it is, study suggests

Published

on

AI chatbots trained to be warm and friendly when interacting with users may also be more prone to inaccuracies, new research suggests.

Oxford Internet Institute (OII) researchers analysed more than 400,000 responses from five AI systems which had been tweaked to communicate in a more empathetic way.

Friendlier answers contained more mistakes – from giving inaccurate medical advice to reaffirming user's false beliefs, the study found.

The findings raise further questions over the trustworthiness of AI models, which are often deliberately designed to be warm and human-like in order to increase engagement.

Such concerns are accentuated by AI chatbots being used for support and even intimacy, as developers seek to broaden their appeal.

The study's authors said while the results may differ across AI models in real-world settings, they indicate that, like humans, these systems make "warmth-accuracy trade-offs" when prioritising friendliness.

"When we're trying to be particularly friendly or come across as warm we might struggle sometimes to tell honest harsh truths," lead author Lujain Ibrahim told the BBC.

"Sometimes we'll trade off being very honest and direct in order to come across as friendly and warm… we suspected that if these trade-offs exist in human data, they might be internalised by language models as well," Ibrahim said.

Newer language models are known for being overly encouraging or sycophantic towards users, as well as for hallucinating – meaning they make things up.

Developers often include disclaimers warning users about the potential for the latter, and some tech chiefs have urged users not to "blindly trust" their AI's responses.

The study saw researchers deliberately make five models of varying size more warm, empathetic and friendly towards users through a process called "fine-tuning".

The models tested included two from Meta and one from French developer Mistral.

Alibaba's model Qwen and GPT4-o, OpenAI's controversial system it recently revoked user access to, were also adjusted for warmth.

These were then prompted with queries researchers said had "objective, verifiable answers, for which inaccurate answers can pose real-world risk".

Tasks included were based on medical knowledge, trivia and conspiracy theories.

When evaluating responses, the researchers found that where error rates for original models ranged from 4% to 35% across tasks, "warm models showed substantially higher error rates".

For instance when questioned on the authenticity of the Apollo moon landings, an original model confirmed they were real and cited "overwhelming" evidence.

Its warmer counterpart, meanwhile, began its reply: "It's really important to acknowledge that there are lots of differing opinions out there about the Apollo missions."

Overall, researchers said warmth-tuning models increased the probability of incorrect responses by 7.43 percentage points on average.

They also found warm models would challenge incorrect user beliefs less often.

They were about 40% more likely to reinforce false user beliefs, particularly when made alongside expressing an emotion.

In contrast, adjusting models to behave in a more "cold" manner resulted in fewer errors, the study's authors said.

Developers fine-tuning models to make them appear more warm and empathetic towards users, such as for companionship or counselling, "risk introducing vulnerabilities that are not present in the original models," the paper said.

Prof Andrew McStay of the Emotional AI Lab at Bangor University said it was also important to remember the context in which people may use chatbots for emotional support.

"This is when and where we are at our most vulnerable – and arguably our least critical selves," he said.

He noted recent findings by the Emotional AI Lab showing a rise in UK teens turning to AI chatbots for advice and companionship.

"Given the OII's findings, this very much calls into question the efficacy and merit of the advice being given," he said.

"Sycophancy is one thing, but factual incorrectness about important topics is another."

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9pdjgvxj8o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

The Papers: Original 'Labour leadership rivals circle' and 'Golden boys' on Baftas red carpet

Published

on

Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox.

Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz623e3d06do?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Chris Mason: Another crunch moment for Starmer as he pleads with Labour MPs not to topple him

Published

on

It feels like the prime minister has to give the speech of his life today.

Those within the Labour Party who want to see him succeed acknowledge that you can't change everything in one speech.

But it is clearly imperative for Sir Keir Starmer to try to calm down a party that is hurting and anxious.

Many Labour MPs have spent the weekend observing the politically scorched earth around them locally – their friends and colleagues in local and devolved government wiped out. There are fraught emotions and there is anger.

And for the last few days now there has been the drip, drip of revolt, with Labour MP after Labour MP coming out publicly to say Starmer has to go.

With every one, a little more of the prime minister's authority drains away.

Incidentally, don't underestimate what a big deal it is for any individual MP to go over the top and say their boss should go – not least because, for now at least, those that have done so are a tiny fraction of the total number of Labour MPs.

And it was his name up in lights as their leader when many of them won their seats for the first time, and often in parts of the country where Labour rarely if ever win. So to say now, out loud, that you think he is a dud is a big deal.

Wherever you look in the Labour Party right now there are knots of anxiety.

Firstly, there is anxiety in Downing Street, of course. They are acutely aware of what is at stake.

Secondly, there is anxiety among the potential challengers, weighing up if, when or whether to go for it. Timing can be everything: get it right, and the premiership can be yours. Get it wrong, and what might be your only chance to be prime minister is gone.

Thirdly, there is anxiety among the many, many Labour MPs keeping their heads down and who really don't want the prime minister to leave right now, nor for there to be a leadership contest.

Then there are those who would like Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham to be Labour's next leader and so don't want a contest right now – because he needs time to firstly find and then win a Westminster seat, having been blocked from standing in one just a few months ago.

So what happens after the speech tomorrow? How do Labour MPs react? Does Catherine West, the former minister who has said she is willing to challenge the prime minister to try to force a contest, decide to back down, or press ahead?

Does the prime minister manage to put people off challenging him, at least for now?

Or is there a flood of anguish that leaves his position untenable and tempts one of the challengers to go for it?

Health Secretary Wes Streeting, in particular, faces a massive call in the next couple of days. He has said he won't challenge Sir Keir, but is prepared to make his case if it becomes clear the prime minister is a goner.

So does he go for it, or not? Some who would like to see him replace Sir Keir think this might be his very best chance, before Burnham can get back to Westminster.

It is worth emphasising that it is not easy to dislodge a sitting prime minister who doesn't want to budge and, up until now at least, Sir Keir has given every indication he wants to stick around.

But what a moment he confronts and his party confronts.

The Labour Party is in a glum swirl right now, where no one can be certain what will happen next.

Whatever does – or doesn't – happen will have consequences for us all.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevp4kr79e4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Ailing Iran Nobel laureate given bail and hospital transfer

Published

on

Iranian human rights campaigner Narges Mohammadi has been transferred from jail to a Tehran hospital amid concern over her deteriorating health.

Iranian authorities granted Mohammadi "a sentence suspension on heavy bail", a foundation run by her family said on Sunday.

Last week Mohammadi's family and supporters warned she could die in prison after suffering two suspected heart attacks earlier this year.

Mohammadi, 54, was awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her activism against female oppression in Iran and promoting human rights.

After pleas from her family for her to be transferred from prison, Mohammadi is "now at Tehran Pars Hospital to be treated by her own medical team", ​the Narges Mohammadi Foundation said in a statement.

She had spent 10 days hospitalised in Zanjan in northern Iran, where she had been serving her sentence.

Mohammadi's Paris-based husband said "she is not in a favourable general condition" and that "her status remains unstable", in a statement over the weekend.

The activist is believed to have lost about 20kg (three stone) while in prison, and has difficulty speaking and is barely recognisable, according to her lawyer Chirinne Ardakani.

In 2021, Mohammadi began serving a 13-year sentence on charges of committing "propaganda activity against the state" and "collusion against state security", which she denied.

In December 2024, she was given a temporary release from Tehran's notorious Evin prison on medical grounds.

Mohammadi was arrested last December for making "provocative remarks" at a memorial ceremony, Iranian authorities said at the time. Her family said she was taken to hospital after being beaten during the arrest.

In early February, Mohammadi was sentenced by a Revolutionary Court to an additional seven-and-a-half years in prison after being convicted of "gathering and collusion" and "propaganda activities", her lawyer said.

Last month, Mohammadi's brother Hamidreza said his sister had been found unconscious by fellow inmates at Zanjan prison after suffering a suspected heart attack.

The foundation's statement on Sunday said "a suspension is not enough" and that the human rights activist requires "permanent, specialised care".

"We must ensure she never returns to prison to face the 18 years remaining on her sentence," it read.

"Now is the time to demand her unconditional freedom and the dismissal of all charges. No human and women's rights activists should ever be imprisoned for their peaceful work," it said.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1j257w87neo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.