Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Starmer would have blocked Mandelson over vetting failure, ministers say

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer would have blocked the appointment of Lord Mandelson as US ambassador had he known he failed security vetting, ministers have said.

The prime minister has come under pressure after it emerged Mandelson was appointed despite security concerns, with No 10 saying red flags in the vetting process were not disclosed by the Foreign Office.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that Sir Keir was told Mandelson had been granted developed vetting status, adding: "If he had known that UK security vetting hadn't cleared him, he would not have made that appointment."

Sir Keir is set to face MPs on Monday to face questions about the appointment.

Opposition parties have called on the prime minister to resign, accusing him of misleading Parliament over his previous statements that due process had been followed in relation to the appointment.

Appearing on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Kendall was asked why Sir Keir had not updated the Commons since being made aware of Mandelson's vetting failure on Tuesday.

She said: "I think one thing we've learned from this whole torrid episode is the need to get the facts absolutely clear and right."

Kendall's defence of Sir Keir echoed remarks by Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, who told the Guardian he had "absolutely no doubt at all" that the prime minister "would never, ever have appointed" Mandelson if he had known he failed vetting.

Lammy, who was foreign secretary at the time of Mandelson's appointment, said that neither he nor his advisers had been told about the vetting process.

The deputy prime minister said he was "surprised and shocked" by the departure of Sir Olly Robbins, the Foreign Office's most senior civil servant who was ousted this week over the vetting row.

Lammy pointed out Sir Olly had only been in the job for a few weeks when the vetting report was returned, and said there were "time pressures" on the Foreign Office to have Mandelson in place shortly after Donald Trump's return to the White House.

His successor in the Foreign Office, Yvette Cooper, previously confirmed Mandelson's vetting was made a "priority clearance", but insisted full checks were still carried out despite the process being fast-tracked.

Sir Keir has said it was "staggering" he had not been told sooner that Mandelson failed security vetting, which only began after the former minister was picked to be the UK's representative in Washington.

Speaking on Sunday, former senior civil servant Helen MacNamara said she did not think Sir Olly should have been sacked, adding: "One of the many frustrating things about this is that there's still no information."

She said the government had tried to find "new processes to blame, new people to blame" for the ill-fated Mandelson appointment.

Speculating about why Foreign Office officials awarded the clearance, she said it was possible there was a view the risks associated with Mandelson were "priced in", and it was for them to do "what the prime minister wanted", before putting in place "any mitigations in place to make sure there weren't any security concerns".

Also appearing on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Conservative shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burqhart said: "I think there's one person who's responsible for everything that's happened, and that's the prime minister."

Robert Jenrick, Reform's Treasury spokesperson, said: "I don't know whether Keir Starmer is a liar or just grossly incompetent – what I do know… is that he's totally unfit to lead this country."

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, appearing on Sky's Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, said Sir Keir has shown "catastrophic misjudgment" on "many levels".

Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, has said new revelations have "called into question" evidence Sir Olly gave to MPs in November, during which he did not disclose that the government's security vetting agency advised the Foreign Office to deny Mandelson a high-level security clearance.

Sir Olly is expected to be questioned by the Foreign Affairs Committee again on Tuesday.

His allies have said this week that he was bound by the confidential nature of the intrusive vetting process, hence why it was not disclosed to Downing Street at the time.

BBC News understands Sir Olly has not formally accepted the committee's invitation to give evidence, but friends of his said he was preparing to appear on Tuesday.

On Saturday, Cooper told the committee she had asked for a review of the information given to MPs by officials to ensure it was "fully accurate".

BBC News understands that those close to Mandelson believe the sacking of Sir Olly as permanent secretary is "egregious".

Cooper has also confirmed that Nick Dyer, who has held a number of other senior roles in government, had been asked to run the Foreign Office civil service on an interim basis.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c80m2z42pr1o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Spring warmth set to return with 26C forecast next week

Published

on

While recent days have felt like winter for some, things will gradually get warmer, especially later in the week ahead.

After returning to around average of the mid to high teens, temperatures will jump into the low twenties for much of the United Kingdom from mid-week.

For parts of south-east England, it could be as warm as 26C by the end of the week, though there is still some uncertainty this far away.

There will be sunshine at times but showers or longer spells of rain will feature in the week ahead.

The weekend will still be quite changeable with a mixture of sunshine and rain at times

With northerly winds across the UK, the temperature has been around 4-7C below average this week.

Showers, thunderstorms and hail have also featured widely with some questioning what has happened to spring.

Thunderstorms and hail are actually quite common features of the weather this time of year as the extra daylight and warmth helps grow bigger showers that bring hail.

With the wind switching to more of a westerly direction over the weekend, it will start to feel warmer although the weather will continue to be quite mixed.

After a bright start on Saturday, cloud increases from the west with some rain in Northern Ireland and western areas of England and Wales.

By Sunday, temperatures will have risen to around 12-16C. This will be close to the average for the time of year. With lighter winds it should actually start to feel warmer than it has done this week.

Showers will be mostly confined to northern and western areas of the UK with sunny spells elsewhere.

Warmer, southerly winds will develop as the week goes on, raising temperatures into the twenties for most of us.

Into next week the temperature will continue to rise very gradually as the wind moves round to a south-westerly.

By Tuesday and Wednesday it will have reached at or just above average with 16-20C for most parts of the UK.

While there'll be some sunny spells, the weather will remain quite mixed with showers or longer spells or rain, especially the further north and west you are.

Later in the week the temperature will start to rise even further with 20-26C looking likely across most areas.

The highest temperatures will be most likely around south-east England.

It's possible they may exceed the highest temperatures we've seen so far this year:

UK & England – 26.6C at Kew Gardens on 8 April

Wales – 24.8C at Mona Airfield on 7 April

Northern Ireland – 21.5C at Altnahinch on 25 April

There should also be quite a bit of dry and mostly sunny weather for many parts as an area of high pressure builds in from the south.

There are signs the settled and warmer weather will persist into the bank holiday weekend.

You can stay right up to date with the latest on the BBC Weather app or website.

Is the UK heading for another drought this summer?

Warning of record global temperatures as chance of very strong El Niño grows

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/weather/articles/cx21rj9j7xpo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

US planning to criminally indict ex-Cuban leader Raúl Castro

Published

on

The US justice department is reportedly preparing to indict aging Cuban leader Raúl Castro in the coming days over the shooting down of two aircraft three decades ago.

The reported charges, which would need to be approved by a US grand jury, emerged as the director of the CIA travelled to Cuba to meet officials in Havana.

Castro, 94, stepped down as Cuban Communist Party leader in 2021, ending his family's more than half a century in power. He led the country for 15 years, stepping in after his brother, Fidel, resigned.

The potential indictment is the latest move in a US pressure campaign that has included an oil blockade and widespread sanctions.

The charges are said to centre on the 1996 downing of two planes operated by the US activist-humanitarian group Brothers to the Rescue.

Unnamed US Department of Justice (DoJ) officials told US media the indictment could come as soon as next Wednesday.

Asked on Friday about the reported indictment plan, President Donald Trump told reporters on Air Force One: "I'll let DoJ comment on it."

He added: "But [Cubans] need help, as you know. And you talk about a declining country. They are really a nation, a country in decline."

Trump has issued an oil blockade against Cuba, which has exacerbated fuel shortages. This week the island's energy minister acknowledged that Cuba has, in essence, run out of fuel oil.

Potential charges against Raúl Castro were unclear, but officials said the investigation centred on an attack on two small planes, which happened on 24 February 1996 while Fidel was president and Raúl was armed forces minister.

Four people aboard were killed in the incident.

Brothers to the Rescue, a Cuban exile group that searched for rafts carrying migrants from Cuba to the US, had previously dropped anti-Castro leaflets near the Cuban coast.

The Cuban government – including Fidel Castro, who died in 2016 – said Brothers to the Rescue had repeatedly violated Cuban airspace, although the International Civil Aviation Organization found the attack took place over international waters.

In March, the attorney general in Florida announced in a news conference that the state was reopening an investigation into Raúl Castro's alleged role in the incident.

Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis praised the possible criminal charges on Friday, calling them "long overdue".

Cuba has not officially commented on the reports of an indictment, but Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez struck a defiant tone on Friday.

"Despite the [US] embargo, sanctions and threats of the use of force, Cuba continues on a path of sovereignty towards its socialist development," he said, according to Reuters news agency.

In order for charges to be filed, prosecutors would have to convince a grand jury, made up of members of the public, that probable cause exists to believe a crime has been committed.

Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche, who leads the US justice department, has declined to confirm reports of an impending indictment.

"If and when there's a time to talk about about that, we will, obviously," Blanche told Fox News.

Trump has said the US wants to change Cuba's communist leadership. He told crowds at a recent rally that the US would be "taking over" the Caribbean island nation, which lies 145km (90 miles) from the US state of Florida.

On Thursday, CIA director John Ratcliffe met his Cuban counterpart at the interior ministry in Havana. Raúl Rodríguez Castro, grandson of Raúl Castro, was at the meeting.

A CIA official told the BBC's US partner CBS that Washington was prepared to engage on economic and security issues, "but only if Cuba makes fundamental changes".

A Cuban statement said the meeting was an attempt to improve dialogue and that Havana was not a threat to US national security.

It came after American officials renewed an offer of $100m (£74m) of aid to ease the effects of its oil blockade.

Washington has focused more on Cuba in recent months after the US indicted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January then removed him from power in an overnight operation.

Analysts say any similar attempt by US special forces to arrest Castro could meet stiff opposition in Cuba, particularly among government loyalists.

William LeoGrande, professor of Latin American politics at the American University in Washington, told the BBC the potential indictment was "one more element of the pressure campaign" that Trump has kept up since returning to office last year.

But further destabilising the island could backfire on the US, said LeoGrande, who wrote the book Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations between Washington and Havana.

"If the Cuban economy and social order collapses, it would actually be a disaster for the United States, because it's likely to touch off a mass migration crisis," the professor said.

He said it looks like the US "is sending a warning to Raúl Castro that he should use his influence to get the government to make concessions".

"Or else the US military may be coming for him, just like it came for President Maduro in Venezuela."

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1w2gnd9xp2o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Would FA Cup win paper over the cracks for Chelsea?

Published

on

Chelsea have won eight and lost eight of their FA Cup final appearances so far, losing their past three in a row

Chelsea go into the FA Cup final in the unusual position of having no permanent manager, an angry fanbase and a lingering question: would beating Manchester City at Wembley be enough to save their season?

Lifting silverware would undoubtedly delight supporters, but concerns over a troubled campaign and anger towards the Clearlake-Boehly ownership group will likely persist.

A draw at Liverpool last weekend prevented Chelsea from becoming the first team to lose seven consecutive league matches before an FA Cup final.

However, it did little to alter their Premier League fortunes. They remain ninth in the table and their pre-season target of Champions League qualification is all but gone.

Qualification for any European competition remains in serious doubt, but victory on Saturday would at least secure a place in the second-tier Europa League – a result that would be welcomed by both players and the club's hierarchy.

It remains a worrying picture for Chelsea, who are operating under strict Uefa financial controls following a settlement last year that limits their spending, as they search for a new head coach.

Bournemouth's Andoni Iraola, Fulham's Marco Silva and former Real Madrid manager Xabi Alonso are understood to be among the options on the club's shortlist. Chelsea sources insist the race is open but, externally, Alonso is seen as the favoured candidate.

Former head coach Enzo Maresca left after a falling out with the hierarchy on New Year's Day, with many believing he has been lined up to succeed Pep Guardiola at City should he depart.

Maresca's replacement, Liam Rosenior, was hired from partner club Strasbourg but lasted less than four months. Interim head coach Calum McFarlane is the first Englishman to lead a team into an FA Cup final since Frank Lampard did so with Chelsea in 2020.

McFarlane earned a point in a 1-1 draw at Etihad Stadium in January in his first experience of leading a senior side, but Guardiola's team remain firm favourites.

A win on Saturday would not only deliver Chelsea their first domestic trophy since 2018, but, even amid any celebration, would be unlikely to quell supporter anger at Stamford Bridge.

Watch live on BBC One and BBC iPlayer (build-up from 13:15 BST) and listen to full match commentary on BBC Radio 5 Live and BBC Sounds. Follow live text commentary plus TV and radio coverage on the BBC Sport website and app.

Fans have protested against BlueCo this season

Not A Project CFC, a growing protest movement, has announced a march up Wembley Way at 13:30 BST before the match. It will feature a large banner focusing "not only on BlueCo's ownership but also on the club's sporting directors".

Three days later, during Chelsea's final home match of the season against Tottenham, supporters plan to turn their backs on the action in the 22nd minute – a reference to 2022, the year BlueCo bought the club.

The group said the protest was "an attempt to send a public message that we have no faith in the current ownership and the direction the club is heading".

It added that the demonstrations would not stop simply because Chelsea are set to appoint their sixth permanent manager, and frustration among supporters centres on footballing issues.

These include what they see as an underwhelming return on spending of more than £1.6bn on predominantly young players, with calls for accountability from the five sporting directors who have led recruitment.

The movement is separate from the Chelsea Supporters' Trust, but the trust has also offered more measured criticism of the club in recent weeks, while focusing its efforts on securing a fairer ticketing policy.

Chelsea insist they are listening and that accountability is built into their system.

There is anger within the club at Chelsea's slide down the table, which is partly attributed to Maresca surprising officials by leaving midway through the campaign, a development that made the decision to recruit Rosenior more appealing.

Unlike Maresca, Rosenior departed on good terms but, having lost the backing of parts of the dressing room, it was felt an interim appointment such as McFarlane offered a better chance of success in both the FA Cup and the Premier League.

The club say they are in a "period of self-reflection", but are keen to point out they have not deviated from their aim of building a winning team or seeking greater "stability" in the head coach role.

Clearlake co-founder Behdad Eghbali acknowledges the club "haven't done [that] right yet" when picking a head coach and will "tweak" their transfer policy to sign more experienced players.

Enzo Fernandez was left out of Chelsea's squad for two matches after Liam Rosenior said he crossed a line

Rosenior had tried to stamp his authority and improve the culture by dropping players like Enzo Fernandez after his comments about a move to Madrid – while criticism of the project has also come from Marc Cucurella.

However, the Fernandez decision had little positive impact and occurred during a historic sequence of six defeats in a row without scoring – Chelsea's worst run in 114 years.

Yet, Reece James and Moises Caicedo have both recently signed new contracts, while Cole Palmer has denied suggestions he is seeking a move to Manchester United.

Joao Pedro is also being linked with a move to Barcelona but is deemed not for sale and said he is "very happy" at the club when speaking to BBC Sport this week.

In a separate interview with UK newspapers before the final, Romeo Lavia says criticism that the players downed tools was "tough to hear" and the squad have seen criticism about their culture and lack of leadership.

Joao Pedro, who has emerged as one of the leaders despite joining in the summer, added: "In the difficult moment you want to see who who wants to win, who want to improve. We have had a tough moment in the Premier League.

"I spoke with everyone here, especially with Reece. We need to change. We need to do something as players. We have conversations between us and everyone is very committed to improve and put Chelsea where it deserves."

Chelsea have not beaten Man City since the 2021 Champions League final, when the club was still owned by Roman Abramovich. City's 13-game unbeaten run in all competitions against them, including 10 wins, is one Chelsea have not endured since before Abramovich transformed the club following his takeover in 2003.

However, Chelsea were already in decline by the time BlueCo took control, having become the first team in English football history under Abramovich to lose three successive FA Cup finals, while also losing six consecutive domestic cup finals.

All of this feeds into a broader identity crisis, with supporters yearning for a return to the early Abramovich era, but experiencing similar managerial turnover under the American ownership – without the same consistent success.

Interim managers have won major honours before. Guus Hiddink lifted the FA Cup in 2009, Roberto di Matteo led Chelsea to their first Champions League title in 2012, and Rafa Benitez followed a year later by winning the Europa League.

Chelsea are a club that have often thrived amid chaos, while other clubs have failed to translate more stable leadership into trophies.

"Well, we just won two trophies last year, so, you know, it kind of depends – a rough patch for whom?" fellow Clearlake co-founder Jose Feliciano told Bloomberg.

"Arsenal hasn't won in 20 years, as far as I have checked – or maybe they've won something – but anyway, we have just won two trophies."

Still, Chelsea are attempting to wean themselves off chaos and into the stability seen at Arsenal or previously at Liverpool under Jurgen Klopp.

They have five sporting directors, a squad built around young players on long-term contracts, and are still searching for a head coach to bring coherence to the project.

Asked w

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cz72l30wqq4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.