Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

'Shy' Anderson on England nerves and becoming a leader

Published

on

The Football Interview is a new series in which the biggest names in sport and entertainment join host Kelly Somers for bold and in-depth conversations about the nation's favourite sport.

We'll explore mindset and motivation, and talk about defining moments, career highs and personal reflections. The Football Interview brings you the person behind the player.

Interviews will drop on weekends across BBC iPlayer, YouTube, BBC Sounds and the BBC Sport website and app. This week's interview will be broadcast on BBC One from 23:35 BST on Saturday, 2 May (and in Scotland at 00:35 on Sunday).

Elliot Anderson's stock has risen quickly.

Four years on from playing in League Two with Bristol Rovers, the Nottingham Forest midfielder has become a regular in Thomas Tuchel's England squad and is tipped to play a lead role at the World Cup this summer.

The 23-year-old has started six of England's past eight games, having been named in the tournament's best XI as the Three Lions won the European Under-21 Championship last summer.

Things have not gone as well for Forest, and they are still in the relegation scrap as they go into the final four games of a season in which they have had four managers.

Anderson sat down with Kelly Somers early last month to talk about his first England call-up, proving himself to his team-mates, and coming out of his shell.

Tuchel's helped me understand new role – Anderson

Kelly Somers: Let's take you back to the very beginning, Elliot. Football… how did it first become a thing in your life? What are your earliest memories?

Elliot Anderson: I've got two older brothers who were football crazy as well – and my dad loved football. I watched them go and play football with their mates and things. I just wanted to copy them, I think. In the house, there were footballs everywhere and we would just play all day.

Kelly: Can you remember a first memory or a first specific thing – with your brothers maybe?

Elliot: Probably my first training session with them, I think. I went and joined them with their team at my school on a Sunday.

Elliot: I'd say I was really really young – probably like four or five.

Elliot: I was just messing about with them really. I would have stayed out of the games and stuff, but they just took me along and the coach let me join in. That's what they tell me about.

Kelly: What was the first proper team that you played for?

Elliot: It's quite a famous boys' club up in Newcastle that quite a lot of players have played for. So I was lucky enough to get in through trials and played for them for a few years.

Kelly: Tell us what that's like – because, as you said, as football fans we hear a lot about it because it's produced some fantastic players.

Elliot: Yeah, it's a great boys' club. Everyone wants to be in academies at Newcastle and stuff. I think the boys' club to get to was Wallsend. Probably the best players around the area joined Wallsend so that was good.

Kelly: Can you remember the moment you found out that you were going to be able to go and play for them?

Elliot: Yeah, I think it was the trials – I think I played under-sevens to under-nines. So you go through trials and stuff and then obviously the group gets smaller and smaller – and then you get the final message to say you've made the squad.

Kelly: We know you went to Newcastle and you came through the academy there and then you went to another big club here in Nottingham Forest – two of England's biggest clubs. What was it like coming through at Newcastle?

Elliot: It was amazing. It was obviously every kid's dream in Newcastle to play for Newcastle, so I loved it. I loved every minute of it! I remember progressing through the ages and getting closer and closer to that professional deal – obviously a scholarship first, and then signing my first pro was massive. And putting that shirt on was an amazing feeling.

Kelly: How did you get from Wallsend to Newcastle? Was that trials? Were you spotted there? Can you remember that process?

Elliot: There was a scout from Newcastle who used to work at Wallsend as well so I think he put my name forward. I used to go to the development things before you could sign on at under-nines. And then I signed for Newcastle at under-nines and had to come away from Wallsend. It was good.

Kelly: Sad, I guess, to leave Wallsend? But that must have been your ultimate aim… to get in the Newcastle academy?

Elliot: Yeah, definitely. Obviously it becomes a little bit more serious. At the boys' club you've got tournaments with your mates and stuff and then you're going into the academy – which is obviously where everyone wants to be – but it notches it up a level.

Kelly: Was there a moment where you looked around, maybe at Wallsend or after, where you thought, 'OK, I could make it here – maybe I've got this opportunity to make it professionally'?

Elliot: I think I was probably too young then. I was always a good player and stuff and everyone would tell me… they'd say: 'You're better than your brothers…'

Elliot: Not very well! But, no, I think that would probably be too young. I think I was probably just playing for the enjoyment and stuff. Maybe towards 15 or 16 you get an inkling that you could possibly go all the way. There's obviously a lot of years to come, but I think at that age I was getting quite excited that I felt I was good.

Kelly: Has there been a turning point? If you look back on your career and you think, 'if that hadn't happened maybe I wouldn't be sitting here playing in the Premier League, playing in Europe, playing for England right now'?

Elliot: The most obvious one is leaving Newcastle. That's not to say I might not have been in this situation if I hadn't left, but you never know do you? I came to Forest, I came out of my comfort zone… I look at where I am now and I'm really happy that I made that move.

Kelly: What about coming here has got the best out of you?

Elliot: I think the club just believed in me and gave me a platform to go out there and show everyone what I can do on a weekly basis. It just helps so much when you've got that sort of backing behind you. Off the pitch as well, it's given me that confidence within the group. Last season, I was quite shy and stuff and now I feel a bit more like a leader in the group. It's a really nice responsibility on me and I'm enjoying it.

Kelly: What's changed then? How have you come from this shy player to a leader?

Elliot: Maybe it's performances? Sometimes when you're a new player and you maybe don't feel part of the group enough, you keep opinions to yourself in trying to help team-mates and stuff. But now I feel like I've got that voice within the group. And, yeah, I'm happy about that.

Kelly: Was it a big change as well, coming from a club that you knew so well to a new club and getting used to how they do things differently?

Elliot: Yeah, definitely. Obviously the faces at Newcastle were all I knew for three, four years going up to the first team. That change took me by surprise, but I thought I took it really well – I really enjoyed my first weeks here and it helped me settle in well.

Kelly: You mentioned you're a leader. What kind of leader are you, do you think?

Elliot: I would say more on the pitch as a leader, not necessarily big talks in the changing room and stuff. I'll leave that to Ryan [Yates] or Morgs [Morgan Gibbs-White], or whoever. Maybe it's just leading by example on the pitch, I think, and communication – stuff like that.

Shades of Gascoigne – the rise of England's Anderson

Kelly: You've become an England international as well… that got a smile straight away! What has that been like for you? And has it given you a new level of confidence? Does it change the way you feel on the pitch?

Elliot: Yeah, definitely. I think that's maybe also played a part in feeling like a leader, you know? Bringing that confidence in my voice. And just the belief in me – that people recognise that I'm the player that I thought

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c0rx21dj1q7o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Estonia says Nato jet shot down drone over its territory

Published

on

Estonia has said a Nato fighter jet shot down a drone, which it suspects was a Ukrainian projectile knocked off course by Russian electronic jamming, over its territory.

Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said a Romanian F-16 fired a missile and drone debris fell in a marshy area in central Estonia on Tuesday. No damage was reported.

Ukraine reacted by accusing Russia of deliberately redirecting Ukrainian drones launched at "legitimate military targets" in Russia, apologising to "Estonia and all of our Baltic friends for such unintended incidents".

Russia has not commented on the latest in a series of recent drone incursions over Nato members Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

Last week, Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina resigned following a political crisis over Russia-bound Ukrainian drones straying into Latvian territory.

Earlier this month, two Ukrainian drones hit an empty oil storage site in Latvia. Ukraine said this was the result of electronic jamming by Russia.

A similar incursion was reported by Estonia and Latvia in March.

Moscow has accused the three Baltic states of allowing Ukraine to use their "air corridors" to strike targets inside Russia – a claimed denied by Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius.

Ukraine has recently intensified its drone and missile attacks against targets in Russia, including oil and gas facilities near the Baltic states.

Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

At Tuesday's news conference, Pevkur said the drone was shot down shortly after 12:00 local time (09:00 GMT) between the lake of Võrtsjärv and the town of Põltsamaa.

He said the projectile had been identified as a potential threat even before it entered Estonia's air space.

"We received early information from Latvia about a drone that had strayed off course, and Estonia tracked the drone until Romanian fighter jets participating in the Baltic air policing mission shot it down," the Estonian defence ministry said in a statement.

Pevkur added he had "immediately" discussed the incident with his Ukrainian counterpart, who apologised for the incident.

"Estonia has not granted permission to use its airspace to anyone other than its allies, and the Ukrainians have not asked for this permission," the Estonian defence minister said.

Local media outlets later published photos of what they said were drone fragments on the ground.

The drone crashed into a forest, about 30m (98ft) from the nearest residential building, Estonia's ERR public broadcaster reported.

It quoted a local resident as saying: "There was a loud bang and I saw the drone fall from the sky."

In Ukraine, Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi said "Russia continues to redirect Ukrainian drones into the Baltics" and did this "on purpose, together with intensified propaganda".

In a statement, he said: "We apologise to Estonia and all of our Baltic friends for such unintended incidents," stressing "we use the Russian airspace to get to them".

His comments came just hours after Russia's foreign intelligence agency SVR said that Ukraine was planning to launch its drones against Russian targets from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

SVR reported that Ukrainian drone military personnel had already been deployed at military bases in Latvia.

Latvia dismissed the claim as Russian "disinformation", with the foreign ministry saying Riga "has not given its consent for its territory and airspace to be used to carry out attacks against targets in the Russian Federation".

And Ukraine's Tykhyi said "there is no truth in Moscow's latest set of falsehoods accusing Ukraine of preparing attacks against Russia from the territory of Latvia".

There is growing concern in the three Baltic states on the easternmost flank of Nato that Moscow is planning major provocations to test the resolve of the military alliance.

Last year, more Nato countries agreed to move troops and fighter jets eastwards after more than a dozen drones had entered the airspace of Poland, another member of the alliance.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c302jy8z4vro?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Southampton expelled from play-offs for spying

Published

on

Spygate is alleged to have taken place two days before Middlesbrough play-off semi-final first leg against Southampton

Southampton have been thrown out of the play-offs after admitting they spied on three clubs in the Championship season.

Middlesbrough, beaten by Southampton in the semi-final, have been reinstated and will now play Hull City for a place in the Premier League.

The EFL charged Saints with watching training sessions involving Oxford United and Ipswich Town, in addition to filming Middlesbrough as they prepared for the first leg of their play-off semi-final on 7 May.

The independent disciplinary commission also handed Southampton a four-point deduction in the Championship for next season.

Saints will now miss out on a game dubbed the richest in world football, with the winners of the play-off final guaranteed a minimum £110m in Premier League broadcast revenue.

The final will remain on Saturday at Wembley with the kick-off time to be confirmed.

Southampton admitted to "multiple breaches of EFL regulations related to the unauthorised filming of other clubs' training", the EFL said.

The club have also received a reprimand in respect of all the charges.

Sources have confirmed to BBC Sport that Southampton will lodge an appeal on Wednesday and will argue that the punishment is disproportionate.

The EFL said it would be "working to try and resolve any appeal on Wednesday 20 May".

It added that "subject to the outcome, it could result in a further change to Saturday's fixture".

The appeal will be heard by an Independent League Arbitration panel with three new members.

The EFL said in a statement: "Southampton was first charged on Friday 8 May, with further charges issued on Sunday 17 May in relation to additional breaches during the 2025-26 season.

"Those additional charges arose from matters identified after the initial proceedings involving Middlesbrough were initiated.

"Southampton admitted breaches of regulations requiring clubs to act with the utmost good faith and prohibiting the observation of another club's training session within 72 hours of a scheduled match.

"The admitted breaches concern fixtures against Oxford United in December 2025, Ipswich Town in April 2026 and Middlesbrough in May 2026."

Southampton did not win any of the three games – they lost 2-1 at Oxford, drew 2-2 at home to Ipswich and claimed a 0-0 draw at Boro.

The statement continued: "The EFL is now in discussion with all three clubs regarding the implications of today's decision and will make a further announcement in due course."

Middlesbrough issued a statement which said they "welcome the outcome".

"We believe this sends out a clear message for the future of our game regarding sporting integrity and conduct," it added.

"As a club, we are now focused on our game against Hull City at Wembley on Saturday. Ticket information for our supporters will be available shortly."

Southampton had already sold tickets for Saturday's game, and their supporters will receive a full refund.

They must now wait to see if the Football Association issues any charges for individuals involved in the spying. The EFL can only apply sanctions against its member clubs.

After a spying case at the 2024 Olympic Games, three members of Canada's staff, including the head coach, were banned from all football by Fifa for a year.

Middlesbrough were at their Rockliffe Park training base preparing for the game against Southampton 48 hours later.

The spy, Southampton analyst intern William Salt, is said to have parked at the golf club, then walked a couple of hundred yards down a road which leads to a raised area of ground.

Sources told the BBC that the accused simply stood pointing his mobile at the training session, while wearing in-ear headphones.

Middlesbrough staff believe he may have been live-streaming the session via a video call.

A member of Middlesbrough's staff approached, say BBC sources, but the person would not identify himself. Then, he quickly deleted some content off his phone before running off into the golf club.

He jogged into the toilets, changed his clothes and hurriedly left the site.

Middlesbrough's photographer took photos and matched him to a photo on the Southampton website. One of those pictures was subsequently made public last week.

Boro were furious and quickly reported it to the EFL.

The EFL charged Southampton with breaking two regulations.

EFL Regulation 3.4, which requires clubs to act towards each other with the utmost good faith; and

EFL Regulation 127, which prohibits any club from observing, or attempting to observe, another club's training session within 72 hours of a scheduled match between the two clubs.

Could Southampton be kicked out of play-offs over Spygate?

Boro want Southampton out of play-offs over Spygate

How Southampton allegedly spied on Middlesbrough

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cwy2pnpqjl7o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Grant Shapps quits aerospace firm after watchdog probe

Published

on

A former Conservative defence secretary has quit his job with a missile manufacturer over concerns he broke the rules governing the employment of former ministers.

Sir Grant Shapps resigned as chairman of Cambridge Aerospace on 30 April "to simplify matters" and after the firm secured a multimillion-pound government missile contract.

He said he had had no involvement in the deal or the company's military work and, despite a title of "chairman", had not chaired its board or been a director, but was "one of several co-founders".

Ministerial ethics watchdog Sir Laurie Magnus said he had "allowed a perception of impropriety to develop" and "failed to uphold the standards expected in the rules".

Sir Grant served as defence secretary under Rishi Sunak and has held a number of ministerial posts in government.

He was the Conservative MP for Welwyn Hatfield in Hertfordshire from 2005 to 2024, when he lost his seat in the general election.

The now defunct Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) approved his role with the company in 2025 on condition that he play no part in its defence-related work until two years after he left office.

Acoba's decision was criticised by anti-corruption campaigners at the time, including Labour MP Phil Brickell, who said Sir Grant's claim the company was focused on "civilian aerospace" was "stretching credulity" given the firm's own description of itself as involved in "defence tech".

In correspondence with Sir Grant, Sir Laurie questioned whether he had complied with this condition, noting the company "seems publicly to have only one project, which is defence-related".

The watchdog initially contacted Sir Grant following the announcement on 10 April of a contract for Cambridge Aerospace to supply the UK and its Gulf allies with "Skyhammer" interceptor missiles.

Sir Laurie said the announcement "appears to be at direct variance with your original description of the role".

He added: "It is, on the face of it, difficult to reconcile the current scope of Cambridge Aerospace's operations with the restriction that you avoid defence matters entirely, and in the absence of a fresh application for advice in view of changes to the nature of the business of Cambridge Aerospace under your chairship."

In response to Sir Laurie's letters, Sir Grant said he had "scrupulously" followed Acoba's rules and was not involved "in any way, at any time, in any capacity" in the contract between Cambridge Aerospace and the Ministry of Defence.

But he apologised for not seeking further advice as the company began working on defence matters, saying this was "an oversight for which the excessive speed of events is the only mitigating circumstance".

Sir Grant also declined to answer a series of detailed questions from Sir Laurie, citing "legal obligations of confidentiality which I cannot unilaterally waive".

Brickell said he welcomed Sir Grant's resignation, but called for tougher sanctions for former ministers who broke the rules.

Do you have a story suggestion for Cambridgeshire? Contact us below.

Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgzjlqv1q9o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.