Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

No 10 says Falklands sovereignty rests with UK after report of US 'review'

Published

on

Sovereignty of the Falkland Islands "rests with the UK", Downing Street has said, following a report the US could review its position on Britain's claim to the territory.

An internal Pentagon email reported by Reuters suggested the US was considering options to punish Nato allies it believed failed to support its war on Iran.

The options discussed also included seeking Spain's suspension from Nato over its opposition to the war. BBC News has not been able to review the email.

A Pentagon spokesperson did not comment on the email's existence, but said it "will ensure that the president has credible options to ensure that our allies are no longer a paper tiger and instead do their part".

"As President Trump has said, despite everything that the United States has done for our Nato allies, they were not there for us," the spokesperson added.

The Falkland Islands, a British overseas territory in the south-west Atlantic Ocean, remain the subject of a sovereignty dispute between Britain and Argentina.

Asked about the report, a No 10 spokesman on Friday said: "The Falkland Islands have previously voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory, and we've always stood behind the islanders' right to self-determination and the fact that sovereignty rests with the UK."

The prime minister's official spokesman also said the government "could not be clearer about the UK's position", and that "sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount".

He continued: "We've expressed this position previously clearly and consistently to successive US administrations and nothing is going to change that."

Previous US administrations have formally recognised the UK's de facto administration of the islands, but have not taken a formal position regarding sovereignty.

"The Falkland Islands has complete confidence in the commitment made by the UK government to uphold and defend our right of self-determination," the islands' government said in a statement.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the reported US stance on the Falkland Islands was "absolute nonsense", adding: "We need to make sure that we back the Falklands. They are British territory."

Reform UK's Nigel Farage said: "This is utterly non-negotiable. There is no way we're even going to have a debate about the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands."

He also said he would raise the issue with Argentina's President Javier Milei when he meets him later this year.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has once again called for the King's upcoming visit to the US to be cancelled.

"This unreliable, damaging president cannot keep insulting our country," Sir Ed said.

The report emerged three days before King Charles and Queen Camilla are due to travel to the US and meet US President Donald Trump at the White House.

While the White House is yet to comment on the report, it could prove to be another point of friction between the US and UK at a time of diplomatic tension.

Trump has previously said he is "not happy" with the level of support offered by the UK during its war in Iran, while Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly said Britain will not be drawn into a wider conflict.

Meanwhile, an official from Nato – responding to the suggestion in the report that the US could push for Spain's expulsion from the military alliance – said its founding treaty "does not foresee any provision for suspension of Nato membership, or expulsion".

Earlier, Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said: "We do not work based on emails. We work with official documents and official positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States."

The Falkland Islands have been under British rule since 1833, but Argentina has historically said it has a right to them on the basis it inherited them from the Spanish crown, as well as the islands' proximity to the South American mainland.

In 1982, a 10-week conflict between the UK and Argentina over the islands was triggered when the latter's military dictator, Leopoldo Galtieri, ordered his country's forces to invade them.

The then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's government sent a naval task force to recapture the islands.

Argentine forces surrendered, but the country still claims sovereignty over the Falklands, which it calls the Malvinas and which lie about 300 miles (483km) east of Argentina.

In the course of the conflict, 649 Argentine military personnel and 255 British military personnel lost their lives, as well as three Falkland Islanders.

More recently, Falkland Islanders have overwhelmingly expressed their desire to remain as a British territory.

A 2013 referendum among the island's 1,672 eligible voters saw all but three voting to continue as an overseas territory, on a turnout of more than 90%.

Successive British governments have long maintained that the island's population has a right to self-determination under international law established by the United Nations Charter.

Argentina's foreign minister Pablo Quirno wrote on X on Friday that his country rejected this, stating that those living in the Falkland Islands had never been recognised as a people by the UN.

"Argentina reaffirms its sovereign rights over the Malvinas Islands", Quirno wrote, adding: "The Argentine Republic once again expresses its willingness to resume bilateral negotiations with the United Kingdom that will allow for finding a peaceful and definitive solution to the sovereignty dispute."

President Javier Milei, who is a close ally of Trump, previously said it would take decades for the dispute to be resolved, and criticised Argentine politicians who "beat their chests demanding sovereignty of the islands, but without any result".

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cde51y0zgjyo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

The Papers: Original 'Labour leadership rivals circle' and 'Golden boys' on Baftas red carpet

Published

on

Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox.

Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz623e3d06do?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Chris Mason: Another crunch moment for Starmer as he pleads with Labour MPs not to topple him

Published

on

It feels like the prime minister has to give the speech of his life today.

Those within the Labour Party who want to see him succeed acknowledge that you can't change everything in one speech.

But it is clearly imperative for Sir Keir Starmer to try to calm down a party that is hurting and anxious.

Many Labour MPs have spent the weekend observing the politically scorched earth around them locally – their friends and colleagues in local and devolved government wiped out. There are fraught emotions and there is anger.

And for the last few days now there has been the drip, drip of revolt, with Labour MP after Labour MP coming out publicly to say Starmer has to go.

With every one, a little more of the prime minister's authority drains away.

Incidentally, don't underestimate what a big deal it is for any individual MP to go over the top and say their boss should go – not least because, for now at least, those that have done so are a tiny fraction of the total number of Labour MPs.

And it was his name up in lights as their leader when many of them won their seats for the first time, and often in parts of the country where Labour rarely if ever win. So to say now, out loud, that you think he is a dud is a big deal.

Wherever you look in the Labour Party right now there are knots of anxiety.

Firstly, there is anxiety in Downing Street, of course. They are acutely aware of what is at stake.

Secondly, there is anxiety among the potential challengers, weighing up if, when or whether to go for it. Timing can be everything: get it right, and the premiership can be yours. Get it wrong, and what might be your only chance to be prime minister is gone.

Thirdly, there is anxiety among the many, many Labour MPs keeping their heads down and who really don't want the prime minister to leave right now, nor for there to be a leadership contest.

Then there are those who would like Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham to be Labour's next leader and so don't want a contest right now – because he needs time to firstly find and then win a Westminster seat, having been blocked from standing in one just a few months ago.

So what happens after the speech tomorrow? How do Labour MPs react? Does Catherine West, the former minister who has said she is willing to challenge the prime minister to try to force a contest, decide to back down, or press ahead?

Does the prime minister manage to put people off challenging him, at least for now?

Or is there a flood of anguish that leaves his position untenable and tempts one of the challengers to go for it?

Health Secretary Wes Streeting, in particular, faces a massive call in the next couple of days. He has said he won't challenge Sir Keir, but is prepared to make his case if it becomes clear the prime minister is a goner.

So does he go for it, or not? Some who would like to see him replace Sir Keir think this might be his very best chance, before Burnham can get back to Westminster.

It is worth emphasising that it is not easy to dislodge a sitting prime minister who doesn't want to budge and, up until now at least, Sir Keir has given every indication he wants to stick around.

But what a moment he confronts and his party confronts.

The Labour Party is in a glum swirl right now, where no one can be certain what will happen next.

Whatever does – or doesn't – happen will have consequences for us all.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevp4kr79e4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Ailing Iran Nobel laureate given bail and hospital transfer

Published

on

Iranian human rights campaigner Narges Mohammadi has been transferred from jail to a Tehran hospital amid concern over her deteriorating health.

Iranian authorities granted Mohammadi "a sentence suspension on heavy bail", a foundation run by her family said on Sunday.

Last week Mohammadi's family and supporters warned she could die in prison after suffering two suspected heart attacks earlier this year.

Mohammadi, 54, was awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her activism against female oppression in Iran and promoting human rights.

After pleas from her family for her to be transferred from prison, Mohammadi is "now at Tehran Pars Hospital to be treated by her own medical team", ​the Narges Mohammadi Foundation said in a statement.

She had spent 10 days hospitalised in Zanjan in northern Iran, where she had been serving her sentence.

Mohammadi's Paris-based husband said "she is not in a favourable general condition" and that "her status remains unstable", in a statement over the weekend.

The activist is believed to have lost about 20kg (three stone) while in prison, and has difficulty speaking and is barely recognisable, according to her lawyer Chirinne Ardakani.

In 2021, Mohammadi began serving a 13-year sentence on charges of committing "propaganda activity against the state" and "collusion against state security", which she denied.

In December 2024, she was given a temporary release from Tehran's notorious Evin prison on medical grounds.

Mohammadi was arrested last December for making "provocative remarks" at a memorial ceremony, Iranian authorities said at the time. Her family said she was taken to hospital after being beaten during the arrest.

In early February, Mohammadi was sentenced by a Revolutionary Court to an additional seven-and-a-half years in prison after being convicted of "gathering and collusion" and "propaganda activities", her lawyer said.

Last month, Mohammadi's brother Hamidreza said his sister had been found unconscious by fellow inmates at Zanjan prison after suffering a suspected heart attack.

The foundation's statement on Sunday said "a suspension is not enough" and that the human rights activist requires "permanent, specialised care".

"We must ensure she never returns to prison to face the 18 years remaining on her sentence," it read.

"Now is the time to demand her unconditional freedom and the dismissal of all charges. No human and women's rights activists should ever be imprisoned for their peaceful work," it said.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1j257w87neo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.