Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

No 10 says Falklands sovereignty rests with UK after report of US 'review'

Published

on

Sovereignty of the Falkland Islands "rests with the UK", Downing Street has said, following a report the US could review its position on Britain's claim to the territory.

An internal Pentagon email reported by Reuters suggested the US was considering options to punish Nato allies it believed failed to support its war on Iran.

The options discussed also included seeking Spain's suspension from Nato over its opposition to the war. BBC News has not been able to review the email.

A Pentagon spokesperson did not comment on the email's existence, but said it "will ensure that the president has credible options to ensure that our allies are no longer a paper tiger and instead do their part".

"As President Trump has said, despite everything that the United States has done for our Nato allies, they were not there for us," the spokesperson added.

The Falkland Islands, a British overseas territory in the south-west Atlantic Ocean, remain the subject of a sovereignty dispute between Britain and Argentina.

Asked about the report, a No 10 spokesman on Friday said: "The Falkland Islands have previously voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory, and we've always stood behind the islanders' right to self-determination and the fact that sovereignty rests with the UK."

The prime minister's official spokesman also said the government "could not be clearer about the UK's position", and that "sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount".

He continued: "We've expressed this position previously clearly and consistently to successive US administrations and nothing is going to change that."

Previous US administrations have formally recognised the UK's de facto administration of the islands, but have not taken a formal position regarding sovereignty.

"The Falkland Islands has complete confidence in the commitment made by the UK government to uphold and defend our right of self-determination," the islands' government said in a statement.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the reported US stance on the Falkland Islands was "absolute nonsense", adding: "We need to make sure that we back the Falklands. They are British territory."

Reform UK's Nigel Farage said: "This is utterly non-negotiable. There is no way we're even going to have a debate about the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands."

He also said he would raise the issue with Argentina's President Javier Milei when he meets him later this year.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has once again called for the King's upcoming visit to the US to be cancelled.

"This unreliable, damaging president cannot keep insulting our country," Sir Ed said.

The report emerged three days before King Charles and Queen Camilla are due to travel to the US and meet US President Donald Trump at the White House.

While the White House is yet to comment on the report, it could prove to be another point of friction between the US and UK at a time of diplomatic tension.

Trump has previously said he is "not happy" with the level of support offered by the UK during its war in Iran, while Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly said Britain will not be drawn into a wider conflict.

Meanwhile, an official from Nato – responding to the suggestion in the report that the US could push for Spain's expulsion from the military alliance – said its founding treaty "does not foresee any provision for suspension of Nato membership, or expulsion".

Earlier, Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said: "We do not work based on emails. We work with official documents and official positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States."

The Falkland Islands have been under British rule since 1833, but Argentina has historically said it has a right to them on the basis it inherited them from the Spanish crown, as well as the islands' proximity to the South American mainland.

In 1982, a 10-week conflict between the UK and Argentina over the islands was triggered when the latter's military dictator, Leopoldo Galtieri, ordered his country's forces to invade them.

The then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's government sent a naval task force to recapture the islands.

Argentine forces surrendered, but the country still claims sovereignty over the Falklands, which it calls the Malvinas and which lie about 300 miles (483km) east of Argentina.

In the course of the conflict, 649 Argentine military personnel and 255 British military personnel lost their lives, as well as three Falkland Islanders.

More recently, Falkland Islanders have overwhelmingly expressed their desire to remain as a British territory.

A 2013 referendum among the island's 1,672 eligible voters saw all but three voting to continue as an overseas territory, on a turnout of more than 90%.

Successive British governments have long maintained that the island's population has a right to self-determination under international law established by the United Nations Charter.

Argentina's foreign minister Pablo Quirno wrote on X on Friday that his country rejected this, stating that those living in the Falkland Islands had never been recognised as a people by the UN.

"Argentina reaffirms its sovereign rights over the Malvinas Islands", Quirno wrote, adding: "The Argentine Republic once again expresses its willingness to resume bilateral negotiations with the United Kingdom that will allow for finding a peaceful and definitive solution to the sovereignty dispute."

President Javier Milei, who is a close ally of Trump, previously said it would take decades for the dispute to be resolved, and criticised Argentine politicians who "beat their chests demanding sovereignty of the islands, but without any result".

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cde51y0zgjyo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Archbishop praises Pope's anti-war comments during Vatican visit

Published

on

The Archbishop of Canterbury has praised Pope Leo for speaking out against injustice after the pair's historic meeting at the Vatican.

Dame Sarah Mullally, the first woman to lead the Church of England, met Pope Leo at the Apostolic Palace on Monday, and told the pontiff he would receive a "warm welcome" if he were to visit the UK.

In an address following a private discussion between the two religious leaders, she said they were united in prayer for justice and for "peace in our world".

It follows the Pope's warning earlier this month that the world is being "ravaged by a handful of tyrants" as he criticised the cost of war during a visit to Cameroon.

Dame Sarah said: "Your Holiness, you have spoken powerfully about the many injustices in our world today, but you have spoken even more powerfully about hope."

The meeting comes weeks after US President Donald Trump accused the Pope of being "weak on crime and terrible for foreign policy".

Pope Leo had voiced concerns over Trump's threat that "a whole civilisation will die" if Iran did not agree to US demands to end the war and open the Strait of Hormuz, a threat which was averted after the two sides agreed to a ceasefire.

The pontiff said he would continue to "speak out loudly against war" and promote peace.

Dame Sarah said the Pope's message "reminded us that despite our sufferings, people long for life in all its fullness and countless people are working each day for this vision of the common good".

She also told him that King Charles III had "valued his recent visit", after the two men prayed together in October.

The symbolic moment was the first time a British monarch had prayed at a public service with the head of the Catholic Church since the Reformation.

Dame Sarah told the Pope: "Please be assured of a warm welcome from the Church of England should you honour the United Kingdom with a visit."

Pope Leo, the first American-born man to lead the Catholic Church, has recently returned from a trip to Africa, where he visited four nations.

His pilgrimage was "full of life and joy", the Archbishop said.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yjyzrnl16o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Tottenham's Simons to miss rest of season and World Cup

Published

on

Tottenham signed Simons from RB Leipzig for £52m in August 2025

Netherlands attacking midfielder Xavi Simons said he was "heartbroken" after being ruled out for the rest of the season for relegation-battling Tottenham and this summer's World Cup because of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament.

Simons was carried off on a stretcher in the second half of Tottenham's 1-0 win at Wolves on Saturday.

The 23-year-old fell to the ground following a collision with Wolves defender Hugo Bueno. After initially getting to his feet, he went down again.

Spurs confirmed Simons will have surgery in the coming weeks.

"They say life can be cruel and today it feels that way," Simons wrote in a social media post.

"My season has come to an abrupt end and I'm just trying to process it. Honestly, I'm heartbroken. None of it makes sense."

Partial tears or ruptures to the ACL typically lead to players being unavailable for between six and nine months as they recover.

"We can confirm that Xavi Simons has ruptured the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in his right knee," said a Tottenham statement., external

"Xavi will undergo surgery in the coming weeks and, following that, will then begin his rehabilitation with our medical team."

What is an ACL injury and why is it so serious?

The injury to Simons comes as Spurs fight for Premier League survival.

Despite beating Wolves, they remain in the relegation zone and are two points from safety with four games left.

The 2026 World Cup, which is taking place in the United States, Canada and Mexico, begins on 11 June, with the Netherlands starting their campaign in Group F against Japan on 14 June.

"All I've wanted to do is fight for my team and now the ability to do that has been snatched away from me… along with the World Cup," added Simons.

"Representing my country this summer just gone. It'll take time to find peace with this, but I'll continue to be the best team-mate I can be. I have no doubt that together we'll win this fight.

"I'll walk this path now, guided by faith, with strength, with resilience, with belief, as I count down the days to getting back out there.

Simons joined Tottenham from RB Leipzig for £52m last summer and has made 28 league appearances for the club this season, including 19 starts.

He has scored two goals in the top flight and registered five assists but has struggled to make a major impact during a season in which the club have parted ways with managers Thomas Frank and Igor Tudor, who was in interim charge, before appointing Roberto de Zerbi.

Simons joins a lengthy Spurs injury list heading into their final four Premier League games against Aston Villa, Leeds United, Chelsea and Everton.

Striker Dominic Solanke also went off injured at Wolves, while Ben Davies, Mohammed Kudus, Dejan Kulusevski, James Maddison, Wilson Odobert and Cristian Romero are all sidelined.

Simons' influence on Tottenham has been clear.

When he plays, Spurs look sharper and more threatening in the final third. His presence raises the tempo, links midfield to attack and forces opponents to adjust to Spurs rather than the other way around.

His season-ending injury removes one of their most important attacking figures at a pivotal moment.

Spurs win a higher percentage of Premier League matches when Simons starts and average more goals – scoring 1.5 per game compared with one when he is not in the starting XI.

Recent displays underline the scale of his contribution.

In the 2-2 draw with Brighton and the 1-0 win over Wolves – their first victory of 2026 – Simons created more chances (four) than any other Spurs player and led the side for shots (six). He was also among the top contributors for touches in the box, ball carries and completed passes.

Those figures show how he drives Spurs forward and sustains pressure in advanced areas. Without that the risk is Spurs lose a key source of control in matches where small margins could shape their season.

The challenge is heightened by what comes next.

Spurs face Aston Villa and Chelsea – both chasing Champions League places – then meet Leeds, who are not yet safe, before a final-day trip to Everton, where David Moyes may still be pushing for Europe.

Latest Tottenham news, analysis and fan views

Ask about Tottenham – what do you want to know?

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cy0101p91z3o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Labour figures criticise calls for inquiry into PM's Mandelson claims

Published

on

Senior Labour figures have criticised calls for a new parliamentary investigation into whether the prime minister was honest with MPs about the vetting process for Lord Mandelson's appointment as the UK's ambassador to the US.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Sir Keir Starmer had misled Parliament "multiple times" on the subject.

She urged Labour MPs to "look into their consciences" and back a new inquiry by the Privileges Committee.

Labour MP Dame Emily Thornberry, who chairs the Foreign Affairs Committee which is looking into the appointment, told the BBC there was no "rush" to set up a new inquiry and suggested some MPs were "trying to score points ahead of the local elections".

Separately ex-Labour ministers Lord Blunkett and Alan Johnson have said an inquiry would be a "waste of money".

The Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to allow a debate on the matter and it would be up to MPs to vote on whether to launch an investigation.

If he does allow a vote, this could take place as soon as Tuesday.

The government holds a majority in the House of Commons, so a large number of Labour MPs would have to vote for an inquiry or abstain in order for one to be launched.

The Privileges Committee can look into cases of MPs breaking parliamentary rules and in 2023 it ruled that the former Prime Minister Boris Johnson had misled MPs about parties in Downing Street during Covid.

The Ministerial Code states that ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament are expected to resign, while any inadvertent error should be corrected "at the earliest opportunity".

Lord Mandelson was sacked seven months after starting the Washington DC job over his friendship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Sir Keir apologised for making the appointment but has continued to face questions over whether the vetting process was rushed.

Speaking on Monday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said there was "still a lot of information that doesn't add up".

"What I'm seeing is a prime minister who is saying whatever he needs to to save his own skin," she added.

She said Sir Keir had misled Parliament when he told MPs that "full due process" had been followed in the appointment process.

She also questioned the prime minister's assertion that "no pressure existed whatsoever" on the Civil Service to approve Lord Mandelson as the UK's ambassador.

However, Sir Olly Robbins, who was the senior civil servant in the Foreign Office until he was sacked by the PM, told the Foreign Affairs Committee last week that there was "constant pressure".

He added that this did not affect his decision to give Lord Mandelson security clearance to take up the role.

In an apparent effort to clarify his comments in Parliament, Sir Keir told the Sunday Times there are "different types of pressure".

"There's pressure – 'Can we get this done quickly?' – which is not an unusual pressure. That is the everyday pressure of government," he said.

Defending the prime minister, Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds said: "It was categorically proven last week that the PM did not lie to Parliament.

"The prime minister had said that due process was followed and due process was followed, unfortunately the process was fundamentally flawed."

A vote on launching a Privileges Committee inquiry is likely to take place on Tuesday – the same day that senior former government figures are due to give evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee including the prime minister's former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and former senior civil servant at the Foreign Office Sir Philip Barton.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: "Labour MPs must be given a free vote on any motion to refer Starmer to the Privileges Committee, not forced into being accomplices to a cover-up.

"If Keir Starmer has misled the House and the public, he must be held to the same standard that we should expect of any prime minister."

Reform UK's economic spokesman Robert Jenrick said the prime minister had "misled Parliament" and had "behaved appallingly".

However, he added: "Parliament needs to actually talk about the priorities of the British people, and that is not primarily about the ins and outs of Peter Mandelson."

In a joint statement to the Times, former Labour ministers Johnson and Lord Blunkett said the Conservative calls for a Privileges Committee inquiry were a "nakedly political stunt".

"Any comparison with Boris Johnson is absurd. When Parliament referred that matter to the Privileges Committee, a police investigation had directly disproved his categoric statements that he knew nothing about the breach of lockdown rules," they said.

Speaking to the BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Dame Emily Thornberry said her committee was investigating the appointment and that she did not want the Privileges Committee to be "duplicating the work we're doing".

"It may be that at some stage in the future, some of the questions haven't been answered, and it is decided that they are of sufficient importance that the Privileges Committee should be involved," she said.

"But I don't really see why we're doing it at the moment, apart from, potentially people trying to score points in advance of the local elections.

"I'm sorry to say that, and I'm not supposed to be partisan on this, but it is as plain as the nose on my face what's going on here."

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3r3r2vzjp1o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.