Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

My tenant owes £15,000 in rent, but I can't get them out of the property

Published

on

Rongmala became an "accidental" landlord when her disabilities meant she could no longer live alone.

She moved in with her children and rented out her south London maisonette.

But last year, her tenant stopped paying rent.

Rongmala, 57, eventually sent an eviction notice and began court proceedings, but several months later the tenant is around £15,000 in rent arrears and refusing to leave.

Court delays are holding up the removal of the tenant, leaving Rongmala feeling "broken".

Some landlords are worried delays like this could become worse under the government's new Renters' Rights Act, which comes into force on 1 May in England.

The new law – which is the biggest overhaul of the private rented sector in a generation – aims to give renters more security and includes a ban on "no fault evictions" and limits to rent increases.

Rongmala says financial problems resulting from her lost rental income are causing her depression. "My children are helping me for everything, but I don't want that," she says.

Since her tenant stopped paying rent, she has had to pay £2,500 for boiler repairs as well as service charges on the estate and a mortgage on the property.

Although a judge awarded a court order for Rongmala to take possession of the property, only court-appointed bailiffs can remove a tenant. The family has been told this could take up to 11 months.

Rongmala's son, Marouf, says the toll it is taking on his mum is "heartbreaking" and adds that she's "helpless" navigating a clogged-up court system.

But dozens of renters have told the BBC about significant difficulties they face, too.

Rosie and her friends – young professionals who were at a protest in London earlier this month – said they had had to move "dozens of times" and that some people were paying "70% of their salaries" in rent.

Fran Brown, 58, told BBC Your Voice that she had had to move properties five times since 2017 and said she is now facing another rent increase. She said she felt she was "at the mercy of the landlord changing their mind".

Another renter, James, said he had received a "terrifying" eviction notice at the end of February, and that he was struggling to find a home for himself, his wife and two children.

He said it was "really tough to face the reality of needing to pack up our entire lives that we've spent 10 years building and put it somewhere else on such short notice on demand".

Currently, under a so-called Section 21 notice, a landlord can evict a tenant without giving a reason – and with just eight weeks' notice. The new legislation will restrict landlords to a handful of legal reasons for evictions, including wanting to move back in, anti-social behaviour by tenants or persistent rent arrears.

The interim director of The Renters Reform Coalition, Clara Collingwood, said she was thrilled and that the change would make a "huge difference".

But landlords say they fear the system will make it harder to remove problematic tenants.

According to figures from the Ministry of Justice, private landlords currently wait 26 weeks – a median figure – between bringing a claim and being able to repossess a property. Ten years ago, it was approximately 16 weeks.

Data from the National Residential Landlords' Association suggests the average rent loss per property is more than £12,000 nationally, and more than £19,000 in London per property.

Section 21 evictions are a "paper-based" administrative process, according to Chris Norris, policy director of the National Residential Landlords' Association – but under the new rules landlords will have to have a court hearing if a tenant challenges an eviction.

A government spokesperson said the reforms would "reduce pressure on the courts in the long-term, but to support them now we are recruiting up to 1,000 judges and tribunal members across all courts and tribunals this year".

They said the Act would give tenants "much needed and long overdue" security in their homes.

Former engineer Keith Taylor, who rents out three properties, is convinced the Act will make life much harder for people like him.

He says some tenants have left around £8,000 in damage at his properties and that the upcoming law is making landlords "very nervous".

Taylor believes more will sell up because changes to the way landlords are taxed, combined with "ever-increasing regulation", won't be worthwhile.

Greg Tsuman, director at Martyn Gerrard estate agents in London, says landlords have been selling up for the last decade, but it has accelerated over the past 12 months.

Landlord Action, a legal service for landlords, and tenants' union Acorn have both reported a rise in Section 21 "no fault" evictions. Section 21 cases made up 22% of Acorn's work with tenants in 2024 – and this has risen to to 31% so far in 2026.

While Norris, of the National Residential Landlords' Association, doesn't think there will be an "exodus" from the market as a result of the Renters Rights' Act, he does think some landlords may be more "picky" about who they rent to.

While the Act will make it illegal to discriminate against people with children, or those on benefits, ultimately a landlord will still have autonomy over who they rent their property to.

Not all landlords are negative about the reforms, however.

Rick Gannon has 70 properties worth more than £10m and believes the new laws will make things fairer for tenants and "weed out bad landlords".

"I think it's the biggest change we've seen in this industry for many, many years and I think most of it is for the better."

Rongmala and Marouf say they "don't want tenants to have to struggle".

But they say small or accidental landlords like her "are facing issues as well" and the government should be trying to help, rather than "making things harder".

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c30r5z3vdydo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

The Papers: Original 'Labour leadership rivals circle' and 'Golden boys' on Baftas red carpet

Published

on

Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox.

Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz623e3d06do?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Chris Mason: Another crunch moment for Starmer as he pleads with Labour MPs not to topple him

Published

on

It feels like the prime minister has to give the speech of his life today.

Those within the Labour Party who want to see him succeed acknowledge that you can't change everything in one speech.

But it is clearly imperative for Sir Keir Starmer to try to calm down a party that is hurting and anxious.

Many Labour MPs have spent the weekend observing the politically scorched earth around them locally – their friends and colleagues in local and devolved government wiped out. There are fraught emotions and there is anger.

And for the last few days now there has been the drip, drip of revolt, with Labour MP after Labour MP coming out publicly to say Starmer has to go.

With every one, a little more of the prime minister's authority drains away.

Incidentally, don't underestimate what a big deal it is for any individual MP to go over the top and say their boss should go – not least because, for now at least, those that have done so are a tiny fraction of the total number of Labour MPs.

And it was his name up in lights as their leader when many of them won their seats for the first time, and often in parts of the country where Labour rarely if ever win. So to say now, out loud, that you think he is a dud is a big deal.

Wherever you look in the Labour Party right now there are knots of anxiety.

Firstly, there is anxiety in Downing Street, of course. They are acutely aware of what is at stake.

Secondly, there is anxiety among the potential challengers, weighing up if, when or whether to go for it. Timing can be everything: get it right, and the premiership can be yours. Get it wrong, and what might be your only chance to be prime minister is gone.

Thirdly, there is anxiety among the many, many Labour MPs keeping their heads down and who really don't want the prime minister to leave right now, nor for there to be a leadership contest.

Then there are those who would like Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham to be Labour's next leader and so don't want a contest right now – because he needs time to firstly find and then win a Westminster seat, having been blocked from standing in one just a few months ago.

So what happens after the speech tomorrow? How do Labour MPs react? Does Catherine West, the former minister who has said she is willing to challenge the prime minister to try to force a contest, decide to back down, or press ahead?

Does the prime minister manage to put people off challenging him, at least for now?

Or is there a flood of anguish that leaves his position untenable and tempts one of the challengers to go for it?

Health Secretary Wes Streeting, in particular, faces a massive call in the next couple of days. He has said he won't challenge Sir Keir, but is prepared to make his case if it becomes clear the prime minister is a goner.

So does he go for it, or not? Some who would like to see him replace Sir Keir think this might be his very best chance, before Burnham can get back to Westminster.

It is worth emphasising that it is not easy to dislodge a sitting prime minister who doesn't want to budge and, up until now at least, Sir Keir has given every indication he wants to stick around.

But what a moment he confronts and his party confronts.

The Labour Party is in a glum swirl right now, where no one can be certain what will happen next.

Whatever does – or doesn't – happen will have consequences for us all.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevp4kr79e4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Ailing Iran Nobel laureate given bail and hospital transfer

Published

on

Iranian human rights campaigner Narges Mohammadi has been transferred from jail to a Tehran hospital amid concern over her deteriorating health.

Iranian authorities granted Mohammadi "a sentence suspension on heavy bail", a foundation run by her family said on Sunday.

Last week Mohammadi's family and supporters warned she could die in prison after suffering two suspected heart attacks earlier this year.

Mohammadi, 54, was awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her activism against female oppression in Iran and promoting human rights.

After pleas from her family for her to be transferred from prison, Mohammadi is "now at Tehran Pars Hospital to be treated by her own medical team", ​the Narges Mohammadi Foundation said in a statement.

She had spent 10 days hospitalised in Zanjan in northern Iran, where she had been serving her sentence.

Mohammadi's Paris-based husband said "she is not in a favourable general condition" and that "her status remains unstable", in a statement over the weekend.

The activist is believed to have lost about 20kg (three stone) while in prison, and has difficulty speaking and is barely recognisable, according to her lawyer Chirinne Ardakani.

In 2021, Mohammadi began serving a 13-year sentence on charges of committing "propaganda activity against the state" and "collusion against state security", which she denied.

In December 2024, she was given a temporary release from Tehran's notorious Evin prison on medical grounds.

Mohammadi was arrested last December for making "provocative remarks" at a memorial ceremony, Iranian authorities said at the time. Her family said she was taken to hospital after being beaten during the arrest.

In early February, Mohammadi was sentenced by a Revolutionary Court to an additional seven-and-a-half years in prison after being convicted of "gathering and collusion" and "propaganda activities", her lawyer said.

Last month, Mohammadi's brother Hamidreza said his sister had been found unconscious by fellow inmates at Zanjan prison after suffering a suspected heart attack.

The foundation's statement on Sunday said "a suspension is not enough" and that the human rights activist requires "permanent, specialised care".

"We must ensure she never returns to prison to face the 18 years remaining on her sentence," it read.

"Now is the time to demand her unconditional freedom and the dismissal of all charges. No human and women's rights activists should ever be imprisoned for their peaceful work," it said.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1j257w87neo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.