Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Men jailed for violence at Henry Nowak police protest

Published

on

Two men have been jailed for violent disorder at a protest in Southampton following the murder of Henry Nowak.

Connor Bishop, 24, was sentenced to two years and eight months and Leon O'Leary, 41, was jailed for three years and one month. Both pleaded guilty to violent disorder at a previous hearing.

They are the first people to be sentenced after violence on 2 June saw 11 police officers and a police dog injured as missiles including wheelie bins and chairs were thrown.

The protest happened after police bodycam footage was released showing Nowak, 18, handcuffed as he lay dying after being stabbed by Vickrum Digwa, 23, who was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years.

A total of 21 people, including Bishop, from Southampton, and O'Leary, from Basingstoke, have been charged in connection with the disorder.

A crowd initially took part in a demonstration outside the city centre police station before gathering close to the Digwa family home.

Digwa stabbed Nowak with a large blade he said he carried on grounds of his Sikh faith, then lied to police at the scene, falsely claiming he was the victim of a racist attack, leading officers to arrest Nowak instead of his killer.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has since launched an investigation into the force's response.

Footage shown in Southampton Crown Court showed O'Leary "walking casually" in the crowd in front of the police cordon when he spots a smoke grenade on the ground, picks it up and throws it towards police.

O'Leary also admitted resisting a police officer and possession of an offensive weapon – a samurai sword in his bedroom – when officers came to arrest him in the early hours of 7 June.

The court heard he adopted a "fighting stance" at the top of the stairs and threatened officers who had to use pava spray to subdue him.

From a search in his bedroom, officers also found the samurai sword, which O'Leary said he owned for 20 years as decorative only and he did not know the law had changed on owning one.

Meanwhile Connor Bishop, 24, from Southampton, was seen in footage wearing a black jumper with "boys get sad too" written on the back, carrying a yellow traffic cone which he threw towards officers.

He was seen running with the cone, "pursuing officers for some time with it", prosecutor, Siobhan Linsley told the court.

"Once it's thrown he then follows it again, picks it up again," she said.

When he was arrested at his home on 3 June, he answered "no comment" but then accepted he was there when shown footage.

He also admitted throwing a box of screws and punching a wall which was not captured on footage.

He told a police interview he was brought up Christian and "threw items to fit into the crowd" and that he had drunk a small amount of beer "that made him more lairy".

Defending Bishop, Thomas Evans said: "He is perhaps an example of peer pressure and group thinking".

Evans said of Bishop and O'Leary: "They are not the instigators of this disorder, they are inevitable result of other individuals who seek to harness anger."

As part of the prosecution Linsley read out statements from those affected by the events.

Sophie Martin, a local resident described the ordeal as "truly awful" adding that she "felt trapped and couldn't leave" her home.

She was concerned that the group outside would manage to get through the police blockade.

"I had no idea what would happen and what they were capable of," she said.

Linsley also read a statement from British Transport Police officer Ruby Stevenson who was assisting the police defensive.

She said: "I didn't think I was going to make it out alive or without serious injury."

Adding she had "never experienced such violence or hate towards police" in her 12-year career.

Linsley told the court that the protests had cost police £443,000 in staffing and accommodation.

She added that Southampton City Council had paid £6,700 to deal with the fallout of the event.

Before sentencing the pair Judge William Mousley KC, summarised the events and explained that police faced "constant assault" from projectiles thrown from the crowd and physical threats.

He said those in attendance had the option to move away, even to leave the disorder and encourage others to do the same.

He said the protests caused "fear, distress and disruption to members of the public and substantial cost to the public purse".

He added that it also led to "significant damage" to property and cars in the area, as well as having a "serious detrimental impact on the community".

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c982y5n0nlno?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Iranian group could be labelled national threat under proposed new law

Published

on

Legislation which would enable the home secretary to designate some state-linked organisations such as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a threat to national security could come into force as early as next month.

The National Security (State Threats) Bill was introduced to Parliament on Tuesday, and could become law within weeks.

It would allow Shabana Mahmood to designate groups involved in "foreign power threat activity" such as assassination attempts, surveillance and sabotage.

The bill also creates three new criminal offences, including one of supporting a designated state threat organisation and two of assisting and accepting material benefit from such a group.

The legislation was suggested by the government's Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation Jonathan Hall KC, when he concluded that it was difficult to ban state-linked groups like the IRGC as terrorist organisations.

In the last year, men have been convicted of spying on Hong Kong dissidents in the UK on behalf of China, carrying out an arson attack on a Ukrainian warehouse on behalf of the Russian group Wagner, and stabbing an opposition journalist in Wimbledon on behalf of Iran.

In those last two cases, the people who carried out the attacks were criminals who were doing it for money.

These cases showed that often hostile foreign powers were not only using their intelligence agencies to undermine security in the UK, but were also hiring criminal proxies through other state-linked organisations such as the Wagner Group and the IRGC.

It meant that the National Security Act 2023, which focused on foreign intelligence services, was quickly out of date.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "Where foreign states are found to be engaging in activity that threatens lives or undermines our democratic institutions, we must ensure that such actions have consequences.

"We will not tolerate hostile actors paying petty criminals to do their dirty work."

Mahmood said: "Foreign states are becoming ever more aggressive – attacking our communities, our way of life, and our institutions – and hiding their tracks behind proxies.

The bill is seen in Whitehall as a vital upgrade of the National Security Act which was only passed three years ago.

Officials say they have been seeing unprecedented levels of threat from people and groups working on behalf of foreign states.

The Director General of MI5, Sir Ken McCallum, said the security service had "tracked more than 20 potentially lethal Iran-backed plots" in just one year.

The prime minister and home secretary fast-tracked the legislation after recent attacks on Jewish targets.

Several of those were claimed by a new group calling itself Harakat Ashab al-Yamin.

The IRGC was set up after the 1979 revolution to defend the country's new Islamic system, but has since become a powerful arm of the state with a reach beyond Iran's borders.

In the impact assessment accompanying the bill, it is anticipated that 10 or fewer organisations will be designated as state threats in the first year after the legislation is passed.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgqj8xzkqqyo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Construction on fire site by Glasgow Central Station might not start for several years

Published

on

The leader of Glasgow City Council has said construction work on the Union Corner site destroyed by fire earlier this year might not begin for five or six years.

Susan Aitken added that the planning and consultation process regarding the land is likely to last until about 2030, partly because the wrecked building has a complicated ownership structure.

She made the comments at an event organised by online newspaper The Glasgow Bell last week. Glasgow City Council said it was exploring options for the site in the short, medium and long term.

A devastating fire broke out on Union Street on 8 March, initially starting in a vape shop on Union Street and then spreading further up the street.

The building is managed by property company Stelmain on behalf of Dunaskin Properties, while the ground-floor retail unit where the fire began is owned by Afton Estates.

Multiple ownership means it is likely to take time before development proposals start to be looked at.

BBC Scotland News understands the council leader's estimated timescale is shared by other senior officials within the local authority.

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said: "We are continuing to work on making the site safe – at this point, focusing on works on the western gable wall – with a view to reopening Union Street as quickly as possible.

"Beyond that, we are working with the owners on how the site will look and feel and how it could be used in the short, medium and long-term."

A recovery group has already been convened, which includes representatives of design and architecture companies.

Only the façade of the building at the corner of Gordon Street and Union Street was left standing after the fire in March.

The building known as Union Corner, dates back to 1851, pre-dating Glasgow Central Station which opened in 1879.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7wx7409g7o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Hidden camera found in government building

Published

on

A hidden camera has been discovered in a government building in the heart of Westminster.

The electronic device was found in the communal area of the complex on Marsham Street, where the Home Office and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) are based.

The i newspaper, which first reported the story, said it was found behind a ceiling panel within the last two months, and security services have been informed.

Home Office sources say it was found in MHCLG's part of the building, away from ministerial offices. An MHCLG spokesperson said: "We do not comment on security matters."

The building is the base for the Home Office, responsible for policing in England and Wales and national security, and MHCLG, which is responsible for housing and planning policy in England.

Tory shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart said: "This is a serious incident that demands an urgent investigation.

"The discovery of a hidden camera inside a building that occupies the Home Office and other departments raises questions about the security of government departments and those seeking to undermine them.

"The public deserves answers. We urgently need to know who was responsible, how long this device was in place and whether any sensitive or classified information has been compromised."

The Home Office declined to comment. The prime minister's spokesman declined to comment, referring reporters to the earlier statement from MHCLG.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c802r4xnkrxo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.