Connect with us

உலகம்

Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile: Can it be safely transferred?

Published

on

Reports say Khamenei issued a directive that Iran’s enriched uranium should not be sent abroad.

Rising tensions between Washington and Tehran as the US proposes a plan to seize Iranian uranium

United States President Donald Trump reiterated on Thursday that the US will not permit Iran to keep its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

However, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has issued a directive that Iran’s enriched uranium should not be sent abroad, the Reuters news agency reported on Thursday, citing two unnamed senior Iranian sources.

The future of the estimated 440kg (970lb) of uranium enriched to 60 percent that Iran is believed to be holding remains a chief sticking point in peace negotiations between the US and Iran.

While uranium enriched to 60 percent is still far short of the 90 percent required for weapons-grade material, it is the point at which it becomes much quicker to reach 90 percent, nuclear experts say.

But even if Iran were to agree to transferring it, can highly enriched uranium be moved between countries safely?

“We will get it. We don’t need it, we don’t want it. We’ll probably destroy it after we get it, but we’re not going to let them have it,” Trump said about Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile when he spoke to reporters at the White House on Thursday.

However, the same day, Reuters reported that Iran’s supreme leader had issued a directive prohibiting the removal of the uranium.

Reuters additionally reported, citing unnamed Israeli officials, that Trump had assured Israel that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile will be sent out of Iran and that any peace deal will include a clause on this.

“The Supreme Leader’s directive, and the consensus within the establishment, is that the stockpile of enriched uranium should not leave the country,” Reuters reported, quoting one of the two Iranian sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Tehran has said for years that its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only and that it does not intend to build nuclear weapons. It signed a deal with the US in 2015 to limit its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. But Trump withdrew from the landmark deal in 2018 and slapped sanctions back on Iran, despite international inspectors stating that Iran had stuck to its side of the deal.

As a result of the US withdrawal from that agreement – known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – and the bombing of Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility in 2021, which Iran blamed on Israel, it decided to enrich uranium from the 3.67 percent allowed under the 2015 deal for nuclear power development purposes, to almost 60 percent.

Iran is now believed to be holding about 440kg (970lb) of uranium enriched to 60 percent. A 90 percent threshold of enriched uranium is needed to produce a nuclear weapon.

In theory, this amount of enriched uranium – should it be enriched to 90 percent – is enough to produce more than 10 nuclear warheads, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi told Al Jazeera in early March.

Almost all of Iran’s stockpile is thought to be in the form of hexafluoride gas, which can be stored in small canisters, each about the size of a scuba tank. This is spun in centrifuges to increase the proportion of uranium-235, the isotope that can support nuclear fission chain reactions.

Most of Iran’s enriched uranium is believed to be lying underground, beneath the rubble of Iran’s nuclear facilities that were bombed by the US and Israel last year during the 12-day Iran-Israel war. In June 2025, Trump said the US attacks had “obliterated” three Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.

But Israel, the US and other Western countries now allege that Iran is seeking, or at least preparing the capacity, to build nuclear weapons. They argue that the 60 percent enrichment level achieved so far is well above what is needed for a civilian nuclear energy programme.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the war will not be considered over until Iran’s enriched uranium is removed, Tehran halts support for its proxy armed groups in the region, and its ballistic missile capabilities are dismantled.

The US wants this stock to be handed over to it, but Iran was reportedly willing to consider handing it only to a third party. Now, Supreme Leader Khamenei is understood to have issued an order prohibiting its removal at all.

Iran’s top diplomat, Abbas Araghchi, told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting of foreign ministers from BRICS nations in New Delhi earlier this month that Iran and the US had reached a “deadlock” on the question of Iran’s “enriched material”.

As a result, he said, the topic is being “postponed” until later stages in the talks. “For the time being, it is not under discussion, it’s not under negotiation, but we will come to that subject in later stages.”

Meanwhile, news reports have suggested that on February 26 this year, during informal negotiations with the US in Geneva two days before the US and Israel launched attacks on Tehran, Iran offered to “downblend” the stockpile from 60 percent to 3.67 percent, in an irreversible process.

Uranium hexafluoride gas is extremely dangerous: If released, it can form highly toxic and corrosive fluoride compounds that are deadly when inhaled and can burn the skin.

The IAEA has specific protocols in place to safely transport enriched uranium. According to the agency’s website, enriched uranium hexafluoride can be transported in type 30B containers, which are heavily fortified, standardised steel cylinders. These are specially designed to withstand high pressure and heat.

The IAEA also states that these cylinders are deliberately built in a small size to “avoid criticality risks”. In this context, “criticality” means an uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction which releases energy and radiation very quickly.

The US exported highly enriched uranium to Canada for medical‑isotope production from the mid‑1980s, but progressively phased out those shipments as producers converted to low‑enriched uranium. By the mid‑2010s, Washington had authorised what it described as the final exports and, in 2021, the US Department of Energy announced it would no longer supply enriched uranium for medical‑isotope production, saying global markets had successfully shifted to low‑enriched uranium.

After the Cold War, US forces flew about 600kg (1,323lb) of weapons-grade uranium out of Kazakhstan to the US in 1994, in a covert operation dubbed Project Sapphire to remove nuclear material left over from the Soviet Union.

The teams involved in this transport worked 12-hour shifts, six days a week, for four weeks just to move the material safely from a metallurgical plant to a local airport, according to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/22/irans-enriched-uranium-stockpile-can-it-be-safely-transferred?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Protesters torch cars, buildings in Belfast after knife attack

Published

on

Unrest comes after a Sudanese man was arrested over a stabbing attack in north Belfast, UK.

Belfast plunged into chaos as vehicles set ablaze following stabbing attack

Anti-immigrant protesters in the city of Belfast in the United Kingdom have torched vehicles and buildings after a Sudanese man was arrested over a knife attack that left one person with serious injuries.

Hundreds of protesters, many of them masked, gathered at several locations across the city on Tuesday, setting fire to a bus and several cars.

A building near the city centre was also set alight, with residents telling the AFP news agency that the protesters started a fire in the bins and went on to throw petrol bombs.

Crowds also gathered in Antrim, about 25km (15 miles) west of Belfast.

Michelle O’Neill, the first minister of Northern Ireland, slammed the protests and urged calm.

“Groups of masked men burning families out of their homes is nothing less than disgusting cowardice,” she wrote on X.

“Racism, intimidation and violence are wrong wherever they occur. There can be no excuse and no justification for these attacks tonight. No one wants to see this on our streets and I again appeal for calm”.

The suspect in the knife attack, which took place in north Belfast late on Monday, was charged late on Tuesday with attempted murder, possession of a bladed weapon in a public place, and making threats to kill.

The 30-year-old man, whose name has not been released, is due to appear in court on Wednesday.

The victim, a man in his 40s, suffered significant injuries to his eyes and slash wounds to his face and back during the attack with a kitchen knife found at the scene, police said.

“I understand that last night’s attempted murder will leave people feeling a range of emotions, from fear to anger,” Northern Ireland’s Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson told ⁠a news conference, as he declared the unrest a “critical incident”.

“I appeal for calm and the safety of all of our communities in ⁠response to this”, he said.

Footage of the knife attack in north Belfast showed several members of the public trying to fight off the ⁠attacker before police arrived, and they were credited by senior officers with saving the man’s life.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the attack “horrific” and “sickening” on X. “I have absolutely no tolerance for abhorrent scenes of violence like this on our streets,” he said.

His office said that “it is time for calm”, adding: “It’s important that police have the time and space to investigate appropriately.”

The attack, which is ⁠not being treated as terrorism, comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Although the victim and convicted killer were both British, protesters on Tuesday stood outside a Southampton hotel that had housed asylum seekers, holding signs that read, “Illegal Migration Is Destroying Our Civilisation”.

The attack in Belfast, meanwhile, sparked immediate questions about the suspect’s immigration status, including from some politicians.

Gavin Robinson, the leader of the Democratic Unionist Party, urged authorities to curb “uncontrolled immigration”, while anti-immigration figures, including Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage and Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe, demanded details about the attacker.

Northern Ireland’s chief constable, Jon Boutcher, told reporters that the suspect was living in the UK on a five-year visa granted in September 2023.

Boutcher said he was believed to have travelled from Sudan to Paris and Dublin before claiming asylum in Belfast.

“There is no trace of this suspect on any of our national security databases, and he was not known to the Police Service of Northern Ireland,” he added.

Northern ‌Ireland’s ‌main political party leaders jointly condemned the knife attack, calling it “horrific” and saying that “there is no place in our society for this kind of brutality”.

They also called for calm, saying that disturbances would only damage their communities.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/10/protesters-torch-cars-buildings-in-belfast-after-knife-attack?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Iran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan in retaliation for US strikes

Published

on

Strikes come after US attacked Iranian ports and islands in the Strait of Hormuz over the downing of a helicopter.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has claimed attacks on United States military bases in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian ports and islands in the Strait of Hormuz.

In a statement carried by state media on Wednesday, the IRGC said it launched drone attacks on the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain and the Ali Al Salem airbase in Kuwait, as well as a long-range missile strike on an airbase in Azraq, Jordan.

It said it attacked 21 US targets and destroyed four of them, including an F-35 fighter jet hangar at the base in Jordan.

It also claimed to have shot down a US MQ-9 drone in the skies over the Iranian city of Jam.

The latest flare-up comes after the US military attacked Qeshm Island and ports along the Iranian coast in the Strait of Hormuz after blaming Iran for downing a US Apache helicopter earlier on Tuesday.

The IRGC said the US’s attacks had caused damage to a telecommunications tower in the town of Sirik and destroyed two water tanks there.

It warned that its forces remain fully prepared to deliver a “crushing and decisive” response to any US military actions and that Washington would bear full responsibility for the consequences of further escalation.

There was no immediate comment from the US.

In Jordan, the military said it intercepted and shot down five missiles launched from Iran towards Azraq, adding that the operation “resulted in the fall of shrapnel without any human injuries or material damage”.

The attacks prompted air raid alarms in Bahrain and Kuwait.

The Kuwaiti military said earlier that it was intercepting “hostile aerial targets” in the country’s airspace, without elaborating further.

Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft in the US, said Iran’s swift response to Washington’s attacks signalled a new doctrine.

“They believe they have to respond proportionately, but very harshly and swiftly, against any American attack. Because otherwise, a new normal is established, one in which the United States can strike at Iran with more or less impunity,” he said.

The Iranians, he said, were making clear that any attack on them would be responded to, regardless of the size and the scope.

“But at the end of the day, every time these different types of events have occurred, the sense I have gotten from both sides is that their confidence and their trust in the ability of reaching a deal is starting to diminish,” he added.

This new round of strikes came a day after Iran and Israel exchanged fire in their most serious escalation since a ceasefire took effect in April. The war began with US and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, and has shaken the global economy and driven up the cost of fuel and food.

Progress towards a peace deal remains slow, complicated further by Israel’s intensifying campaign in Lebanon against the Iranian-backed Hezbollah.

Al Jazeera’s Mohamed Vall, reporting from Tehran, said that despite the latest strikes, neither side wanted a return to full-scale war.

“Whether the Americans are going to absorb this latest retaliation from the Iranians and end their operation or whether there will be new attacks will become clear in the next few hours,” he said.

“But the understanding is that both sides would like to go back to negotiations, even though the Iranians say they don’t trust any American initiative with regards to peace.”

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/10/iran-strikes-bahrain-and-jordan-in-retaliation-for-us-attacks-in-hormuz?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Bolivia approves military measures against nationwide protests

Published

on

Bolivia approves military measures against nationwide protests

Bolivian President Rodrigo Paz has authorised military force against protesters amid the country’s worst economic crisis in 40 years, after roadblocks paralysed the nation. At least 10 people have been killed since the unrest began.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/10/bolivia-approves-military-measures-against-nationwide-protests?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.