Connect with us

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

I gave up my job due to the stress of my child's food allergies

Published

on

A mother has said she felt forced to give up her job to look after her daughter due to the "horrific ongoing stress" of living with the five-year-old's life-threatening food allergies.

Katy, from Cornwall, said she thought she was going to lose Molly when she suffered a severe allergic reaction while on a family holiday in Italy, aged one.

After eating a meal at a restaurant, Molly "started getting really lethargic, then just went floppy", Katy recalled.

"We were terrified… We just ran through the streets trying to get back to the hotel," she continued.

"It was the worst experience of mine and my husband's life."

Katy administered an adrenaline pen and Molly was taken to hospital where she later recovered, but Katy said the fear had never left her.

Her experience comes as doctors, charities and patients call for wider access to treatment on the NHS.

The National Allergy Strategy Group is urging the government to make desensitisation treatments like food oral immunotherapy (OIT), which can cost thousands of pounds privately, more accessible on the NHS.

OIT is a treatment that involves patients consuming very small, carefully measured amounts of the food they are allergic to, under medical supervision. The dose is gradually increased over time to help the immune system become more tolerant.

An NHS spokesperson said it was "currently supporting a trial to gather more evidence on the use of oral immunotherapy for food allergies, while also developing guidance to support local services to improve allergy care".

Molly is allergic to milk, egg and some nuts.

Katy said the reaction happened despite her carefully explaining the risks to restaurant staff, both verbally and using translation cards.

One year later, it happened again. This time in England when Molly ate a muffin containing milk.

Katy said it was following this that she gave up her job as a lawyer to look after her daughter after realising she "didn't trust anyone with her allergies".

She had been due to return to work following maternity leave for her second child.

Although there was a "really big case" at the law firm she was with, she said she felt she had "no option" but to leave the business, halving her family's income.

Molly has now started school and Katy said she felt she could consider going back to work as she had confidence in her school's policies – and because it had also been announced allergies training would be made compulsory in England.

Food allergy rates in England are estimated to have doubled in the decade to 2018, according to a major study published in The Lancet in 2024.

The sharpest rise has been among children under five, with about 4% affected.

Emergency hospital admissions for food‑related anaphylaxis also doubled in the 20 years to 2024, reaching 1,709 cases.

Professor Adam Fox, who specialises in paediatric allergy, said allergies now had "major public health implications for millions of people".

A charity‑funded clinical OIT programme is currently running in nine NHS hospitals in England, using shop-bought foods to treat peanut and milk allergies.

An NHS spokesperson said: "Oral immunotherapy as a treatment for food allergies is not routinely available on the NHS due to limited evidence around the effectiveness of available products."

But Fox said studies such as those by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) had already provided adequate evidence that OIT was safe and effective.

"The problem is not doing the research, it's for the NHS to then put the resource and the organisational will between turning it into something that people actually have access to in a timeframe that it would be useful," he said.

A 2025 report by the British Society for Allergy & Clinical Immunology (BSACI) Registry for Immunotherapy (BRIT) highlighted "unmet need" and "unwarranted variation" in UK provision of immunotherapy.

Katy said Molly had been referred by her local NHS trust for milk OIT, but they had been told she was on a waiting list of "at least two years", that it was almost 300 miles away in London and there was "no guarantee of being accepted".

Parents Scott and Louisa, from Helston in Cornwall, sought private OIT for their five-year-old daughter Carey after she suffered an "extremely frightening" anaphylactic reaction as a toddler.

Scott said doing this was "a big sacrifice" both financially and in terms of the effort required.

The family had to travel 400 miles for every round trip to the clinic in Hampshire.

The treatment for Carey's walnut and pecan allergy cost £6,000, with a further £4,000 set aside for associated travel and hotel costs.

She was given small doses of nuts at the private clinic she attended, which was increased over time to retrain her immune system to tolerate the food.

Carey can now eat seven walnuts or pecans without having an allergic reaction so treatment was "100% worth it", Scott said.

He added Carey must continue eating the nut regularly to maintain tolerance, with her progress to be reviewed after a year.

The clinic Carey attended is run by Dr Helen Evans-Howells, a GP and allergy specialist, who described it as "a tragedy" the NHS was not offering OIT more widely.

While she understood it was under huge financial pressure, she argued earlier treatment would "ultimately save money" for the NHS in the future.

As chair of Anaphylaxis UK's clinical and scientific panel, she also said: "We are having admissions for reactions, missed days off work or school, a significant impact on their wellbeing."

She said the costs involved in OIT were due to "development of protocols, full-time access for patient support, insurance costs and the employment and training of staff".

She added her clinic operated "under robust clinical governance frameworks, including comprehensive policies for patient safety, anaphylaxis management, and escalation of care".

The current treatments have not yet passed through the NHS's regulatory process.

Food immunotherapy practitioners use ordinary foods such as nuts or milk in their programmes, rather than licensed pharmaceutical products.

Because these foods are not classified as medicines, their use in treatment is unlicensed and unregulated in the UK, BSACI said.

It added more work needed to be done on guidance for clinics.

BSACI advised they "must be suitably equipped to manage allergic reactions" with treatment "delivered by a practising allergist who is also a member of the BSACI or has other credentials that would show their learning and competency in this area".

Dr Sian Ludman, a paediatric allergy consultant at Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, said she felt there was "a lack for our patients" in south-west England with such limited immunotherapy options for children.

"We are able to refer up to certain centres in London, for example, but their waiting list is incredibly long," she said.

She did also stress OIT was not appropriate for everyone.

The results of the NHS-supported Natasha Trial are expected in 2027.

Tanya Ednan-Laperouse, founder and trustee of the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation which has funded the trial, said the aim was "to show that everyday, shop-bought foods, taken under medical supervision, rather than expensive pharmaceuticals, can be used as an effective oral immunotherapy treatment".

She added it was hoped the findings "will show this approach is not only effective at treating food allergy but is cost effective and will therefore be adopted by the NHS".

But the BSACI said: "To meet regulatory standards it will require significant regulatory and safety issues to be addressed."

A licensed peanut allergy treatment, Palforzia, was available on the NHS for under‑18s but was later withdrawn from the global market by the manufacturer.

The decision was "not related to the quality, safety or efficacy of the medicine, but based on strategic and operational considerations," BSACI said.

Other immunotherapy treatments are licensed

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgzdqy27zjo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

The Papers: Original 'Labour leadership rivals circle' and 'Golden boys' on Baftas red carpet

Published

on

Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox.

Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz623e3d06do?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Chris Mason: Another crunch moment for Starmer as he pleads with Labour MPs not to topple him

Published

on

It feels like the prime minister has to give the speech of his life today.

Those within the Labour Party who want to see him succeed acknowledge that you can't change everything in one speech.

But it is clearly imperative for Sir Keir Starmer to try to calm down a party that is hurting and anxious.

Many Labour MPs have spent the weekend observing the politically scorched earth around them locally – their friends and colleagues in local and devolved government wiped out. There are fraught emotions and there is anger.

And for the last few days now there has been the drip, drip of revolt, with Labour MP after Labour MP coming out publicly to say Starmer has to go.

With every one, a little more of the prime minister's authority drains away.

Incidentally, don't underestimate what a big deal it is for any individual MP to go over the top and say their boss should go – not least because, for now at least, those that have done so are a tiny fraction of the total number of Labour MPs.

And it was his name up in lights as their leader when many of them won their seats for the first time, and often in parts of the country where Labour rarely if ever win. So to say now, out loud, that you think he is a dud is a big deal.

Wherever you look in the Labour Party right now there are knots of anxiety.

Firstly, there is anxiety in Downing Street, of course. They are acutely aware of what is at stake.

Secondly, there is anxiety among the potential challengers, weighing up if, when or whether to go for it. Timing can be everything: get it right, and the premiership can be yours. Get it wrong, and what might be your only chance to be prime minister is gone.

Thirdly, there is anxiety among the many, many Labour MPs keeping their heads down and who really don't want the prime minister to leave right now, nor for there to be a leadership contest.

Then there are those who would like Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham to be Labour's next leader and so don't want a contest right now – because he needs time to firstly find and then win a Westminster seat, having been blocked from standing in one just a few months ago.

So what happens after the speech tomorrow? How do Labour MPs react? Does Catherine West, the former minister who has said she is willing to challenge the prime minister to try to force a contest, decide to back down, or press ahead?

Does the prime minister manage to put people off challenging him, at least for now?

Or is there a flood of anguish that leaves his position untenable and tempts one of the challengers to go for it?

Health Secretary Wes Streeting, in particular, faces a massive call in the next couple of days. He has said he won't challenge Sir Keir, but is prepared to make his case if it becomes clear the prime minister is a goner.

So does he go for it, or not? Some who would like to see him replace Sir Keir think this might be his very best chance, before Burnham can get back to Westminster.

It is worth emphasising that it is not easy to dislodge a sitting prime minister who doesn't want to budge and, up until now at least, Sir Keir has given every indication he wants to stick around.

But what a moment he confronts and his party confronts.

The Labour Party is in a glum swirl right now, where no one can be certain what will happen next.

Whatever does – or doesn't – happen will have consequences for us all.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevp4kr79e4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

முக்கியச் செய்திகள்

Ailing Iran Nobel laureate given bail and hospital transfer

Published

on

Iranian human rights campaigner Narges Mohammadi has been transferred from jail to a Tehran hospital amid concern over her deteriorating health.

Iranian authorities granted Mohammadi "a sentence suspension on heavy bail", a foundation run by her family said on Sunday.

Last week Mohammadi's family and supporters warned she could die in prison after suffering two suspected heart attacks earlier this year.

Mohammadi, 54, was awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her activism against female oppression in Iran and promoting human rights.

After pleas from her family for her to be transferred from prison, Mohammadi is "now at Tehran Pars Hospital to be treated by her own medical team", ​the Narges Mohammadi Foundation said in a statement.

She had spent 10 days hospitalised in Zanjan in northern Iran, where she had been serving her sentence.

Mohammadi's Paris-based husband said "she is not in a favourable general condition" and that "her status remains unstable", in a statement over the weekend.

The activist is believed to have lost about 20kg (three stone) while in prison, and has difficulty speaking and is barely recognisable, according to her lawyer Chirinne Ardakani.

In 2021, Mohammadi began serving a 13-year sentence on charges of committing "propaganda activity against the state" and "collusion against state security", which she denied.

In December 2024, she was given a temporary release from Tehran's notorious Evin prison on medical grounds.

Mohammadi was arrested last December for making "provocative remarks" at a memorial ceremony, Iranian authorities said at the time. Her family said she was taken to hospital after being beaten during the arrest.

In early February, Mohammadi was sentenced by a Revolutionary Court to an additional seven-and-a-half years in prison after being convicted of "gathering and collusion" and "propaganda activities", her lawyer said.

Last month, Mohammadi's brother Hamidreza said his sister had been found unconscious by fellow inmates at Zanjan prison after suffering a suspected heart attack.

The foundation's statement on Sunday said "a suspension is not enough" and that the human rights activist requires "permanent, specialised care".

"We must ensure she never returns to prison to face the 18 years remaining on her sentence," it read.

"Now is the time to demand her unconditional freedom and the dismissal of all charges. No human and women's rights activists should ever be imprisoned for their peaceful work," it said.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1j257w87neo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.