Connect with us

உலகம்

‘A year of resistance’: Cuba’s private sector faces Trump’s oil blockade

Published

on

The US oil blockade on Cuba is a significant blow to small family firms struggling with power outages and fuel shortages.

Havana, Cuba – On a Friday last month, every table outside Oishi’s food booth in Pabellon Cuba, an exhibition venue in the heart of Havana, was packed with customers eating burgers and pizzas.

While the stand looked like an oasis of plenty, its owner, 46-year-old Miguel Salva, phone glued to his ear, looked like a broker in the middle of a collapse.

“The fuel crisis has been a nightmare for us,” he said after hanging up.

Since the United States, under President Donald Trump, imposed an oil blockade on Cuba in late January, power outages and fuel shortages have dealt a staggering blow to small family businesses like Salva’s.

Oishi’s headquarters used to be a restaurant in the Havana municipality of Regla, where the already long blackouts have spiralled to 15 hours or more a day.

Salva had a backup generator, but the numbers did not add up: Petrol prices have surged from about $1 a litre ($3.80 a gallon) earlier this year to $10 on the black market. The spike followed the Cuban government’s decision to cancel diesel sales in February and strictly ration petrol as part of the fuel-saving response to the blockade.

“I had to close the restaurant,” Salva said. “I spent days in tears.”

Across from Oishi’s food booth, Pincharte was selling fried rice and charcoal-grilled meat skewers. Unlike Oishi, Pincharte never had a home base. It is an itinerant operation, hauling ovens and freezers from fair to fair in large diesel-powered trucks.

“Without fuel, our expenses have increased eightfold,” said 31-year-old co-owner Elianis Aguero. “Right now, no business is profitable if you depend on fuel.”

This year, both Pincharte and Oishi plan to pivot to renewable energy, investing in solar panels and electric vehicles.

But with demand rising, the price of an electric tricycle has jumped by 50 percent.

“This will be a year of resistance,” Salva said.

“The oil blockade affects all of Cuba’s private sector – from logistics and marketing to exports and imports, and even productive capacity,” said 41-year-old Eric Almeida, president of Quota, a consulting company with headquarters across from Pabellon Cuba.

Before the crisis, trucking a container to Havana from the port cost between $100 and $150. Nowadays, it costs no less than $600.

“That cost makes the final product more expensive for the client and stalls the entire commercial processes,” said Almeida.

Quota has also taken a hit as clients are forced to slash non-essential spending, while others have simply closed or refocused their businesses. Quota is not far behind them.

“We have had to reorganise to survive,” Almeida said. He estimates that his net income this year will plummet by 50 to 60 percent compared with the forecast he had made before the oil crisis.

The only silver lining is that the crisis has forced the Cuban government to loosen its reins on the private sector.

In the past three months, the Cuban government has created new regulations to offer more opportunities to the private sector, in an attempt to loosen its historical state centralism.

It allowed, for example, greater tax exemptions for the import of solar panels by any type of business. It also announced that all Cubans residing abroad will be able to open small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) on the island. Until now, that right has been reserved only for those who live in Cuba or who hold “effective migratory residency”, a requirement that demands having accumulated more than 180 days of stay in Cuba.

Similarly, it relaxed the rules on the marketing of agricultural products. Before, this could practically only be done through a state-owned collection company; now, the private sector is allowed to invest in the distribution chains.

But what might be the most significant shift came in March with a new law authorising mixed limited liability companies, allowing private capital to merge with state companies for the first time.

The change opens the doors for the private sector to invest in industries historically controlled by the government, like sugar and precious mineral mining. Health, education, and the military remain off limits, however.

While Cuba has operated for decades with a predominantly state-run and centralised economy, its private sector began to develop in the 2010s. It gained real momentum in 2021, when the government permitted the creation of smaller-scale businesses, or SMEs, as it looked for a way out of the economic crisis and a goods shortage generated by escalating US sanctions and the COVID-19 pandemic.

“SMEs emerged in the context of a crisis within a crisis,” said Almeida.

In the years that followed, the private sector weathered a government that swung unpredictably between periods of flexibility and control.

“Cuban entrepreneurship finds itself between two swords of Damocles,” said Almeida. “The internal sword is the red tape and the slow pace; the external one is the oil blockade and US sanctions, which prevent our access to the international financial system.”

Today, there are about 10,000 active SMEs, which represents a significant boost to the country’s economy. Cuban economist Ricardo Torres Perez, in a September report based on official data, said the private sector contributed 15 percent of GDP, 31.2 percent of national employment, 55 percent of retail sales, and 23 percent of state tax revenues.

Cuba’s private sector has grown “on the basis of resilience, resistance, and creativity”, said Almeida.

On February 6, the Cuban government authorised private companies to import fuel, previously reserved only for the state. Weeks later, the US Bureau of Industry and Security followed suit, authorising exports of US oil and gas products to eligible Cuban private sector entities.

“There are fuel imports by some private entrepreneurs who bring it into the country for their businesses and, in part, to be marketed. But the quantities imported so far are minimal,” said Argelio Abad, first deputy minister of energy and mines, in a news conference on March 20.

Between February and March, the island’s private sector imported roughly 30,000 barrels of fuel (about 4.8 million litres or 1.3 million gallons) from the US, according to the Reuters news agency.

According to Jorge Piñon, a researcher at the Energy Institute of the University of Texas at Austin, Cuba requires about 100,000 barrels a day – and only produces 40 percent – to power its grid and meet the regular transportation demands. Essential services for the population depend entirely on the state’s fuel supply, currently strangled by Washington.

According to Almeida, importing a single tank of about 25,000 litres (6,600 gallons) costs between $45,000 and $50,000, plus 13 percent in commissions to the state importer and Union Cuba-Petroleo, the sole state entity authorised to handle fuel.

For large-scale operations, it is still profitable for a tank, since the price sits at approximately $2 per litre ($7.6 per gallon), five times cheaper than the black market.

However, it is a very “unstable” investment, Almeida said. The Cuban government and the Trump administration are currently holding negotiations. If they were to reach an agreement, $2 per litre of fuel would be expensive compared with the standard price before the oil blockade.

But even if they were willing to gamble, businesses like Oishi, Quota or Pincharte are effectively barred from fuel.

They cannot afford to buy a tank by themselves. The current regulation prevents companies from pooling together to buy one, and even buying from other private SMEs that are already importing fuel remains largely prohibited.

Last year, Pincharte was growing. Aguero was planning to open new booths in several locations. Since January, her dreams of growth have shattered, and she has settled for survival instead.

“This year has been very challenging,” she said. “One way

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/5/9/a-year-of-resistance-cubas-private-sector-faces-trumps-oil-blockade?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Police in Belfast use water cannon as anti-immigrant unrest continues

Published

on

Clashes come as family of knife attack victim calls for calm and condemns violence targeting immigrants.

Unrest in Northern Ireland: Second day of anti-immigration protests in Belfast

Police in the United Kingdom city of Belfast have used water cannon to disperse dozens of far-right protesters during a second night of unrest triggered by a knife attack involving a Sudanese refugee.

The clashes on Wednesday came as the family of the stabbing victim appealed for calm and condemned the wave of anti-immigrant violence in the city in Northern Ireland.

Police said the protesters threw “missiles” such as rocks and bottles at officers, while images from the scene showed several fires burning on the streets.

Police said officers deployed “water cannon in an attempt to maintain public order”.

But the unrest was markedly less severe than on Tuesday evening, when hundreds of masked men burned families out of their homes and set vehicles alight.

“We want to make it absolutely clear that overnight unrest is not welcome, and peaceful protest is the only way forward,” the family of the victim, Stephen Ogilvie, said in a statement.

“We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country… We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility,” it said.

The family added that Ogilvie, who lost an eye and suffered serious wounds to his neck and face, was in a stable condition.

Their appeal came as the suspect in the attack, a 30-year-old ‌Sudanese national named Hadi Alodid, appeared in court on charges including attempted murder.

He was remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to July 8.

Videos of the stabbing attack circulated online all day on Tuesday, sparking calls on social media for violent protest. Police had to help one family escape from a burning house, according to the Reuters news agency, while several cars and a bus were set on fire and reduced to shells.

Local politicians and a pastor said many of those targeted were Black.

UK minister Ruth Anderson said at least 27 people were made homeless in Belfast “because people went door-to-door to try and target foreign nationals”.

Resident Jamie Corry, 33, said he could only watch on as his house went up in flames.

“I was actually standing right there watching my whole house just go up, slowly but surely,” he told Reuters. “I told them and all, when they were lighting a car up on fire, ‘that’s my property, that’s my property’… and they still didn’t care.”

The attack comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted many messages that blamed migration on violence in the UK, sharing a post that argued that the “very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and open borders” is increasing tensions.

Amid calls from Musk, other far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson called for more protests on Wednesday, Northern Ireland’s police chief said ⁠an extra 200 officers were being deployed on the streets.

“These idiots didn’t just target ethnic minority groups… they targeted society,” Chief ⁠Constable Jon Boutcher said of Tuesday night’s rioters.

Officers had to take a family that included a two-month-old baby to safety during Tuesday’s violence, which he branded “a huge act of self-harm by mindless idiots”.

Speaking in London, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the knife attack raised serious questions, but that “driving people out of their homes is not … the right way to respond”.

He condemned the unrest as “shocking and completely unacceptable”.

Anna Turley, the chairwoman of the UK’s governing Labour Party, meanwhile, said that online platforms were “playing a role in driving” the unrest and suggested Musk was one of the “bad faith actors” inflaming tensions.

The United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned what he called “incitement” on social media. “Dehumanisation of whole groups within a society is totally unacceptable and frankly despicable,” he told reporters in Geneva, adding that the violence in both Northern Ireland and Southampton had been “really shocking”.

Social media providers, he insisted, must take seriously their responsibility to prevent hate speech and incitement to violence.

Immigration has historically been low in Northern Ireland, partly due to the three-decade conflict between mainly Catholic Irish nationalists seeking Irish unity and predominantly Protestant pro-British “loyalists” wanting to stay in the UK and the British military.

However, migration has increased in recent years, and there has been an increasing sentiment against it in both Northern Ireland and parts of the Republic of Ireland.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/police-in-belfast-use-water-cannon-as-anti-immigrant-unrest-continues?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Published

on

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Defiant crowds of Hezbollah supporters rallied in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighbourhood to support Iran’s role in standing against Israel, and rejecting efforts to separate Lebanon’s war from Iran’s. Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/11/dahiyeh-crowds-rally-in-favour-of-iranian-support-against-israel?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

OpenAI says China-based actors stoking opposition to AI data centres

Published

on

AI company says ChatGPT accounts sought to ‘exploit and amplify existing public concerns’ about energy prices.

China-based actors are likely behind the use of ChatGPT for “covert influence operations” aimed at stoking opposition to data centres in the United States, OpenAI has said.

In a research report released on Wednesday, the company behind the world’s most popular AI chatbot said it had banned a cluster of accounts likely based in China for attempting to “manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI”.

OpenAI, whose release of ChatGPT in 2022 kicked off a global frenzy around AI, said the accounts were used to generate social media comments and images that blamed data centres for rising electricity prices in communities across the US.

Among other content, the accounts generated a comic strip showing a cigar-chomping businessman holding bags marked with dollar signs as a family reacted in shock to their electricity bill, according to the San Francisco-based company.

OpenAI said a second cluster of accounts had generated content casting US tariffs as an effort to “dominate technological competition” with China, and specified that the material should not mention Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While the campaign sought to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” about energy prices, OpenAI found no evidence that it had a “meaningful” influence, the company said.

“Foreign influence operations have long sought to latch onto existing local issues and sincerely held beliefs, using them to build credibility, amplify divisions or exacerbate public distrust,” the ChatGPT creator said.

“In this case, the operators attempted to covertly insert themselves into an ongoing American debate about the future of the country’s AI capabilities while hiding who they were and what motivated them.”

China’s embassy in Washington, DC, said it was not familiar with the report but that it opposed “any groundless attacks or smears against China”.

“AI is profoundly changing the way people work and live. It is a new frontier for all humanity,” an embassy spokesperson said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.

“China believes in a people-centered approach to AI and advocates openness and inclusiveness to ensure AI is a force for good and for all.”

OpenAI is the latest prominent voice to suggest foreign influence could be behind opposition to AI in the US.

In May, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum told a policy event hosted by Breitbart News that the public’s increasingly negative sentiment towards the construction of data centres was not “organic” and could, in some cases, be linked to “foreign-sourced dark money”.

Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina, who studies foreign influence campaigns, expressed doubt that the campaign identified by OpenAI or any other coordinated effort would have much impact on the “volume or tone” of the public debate.

“My team is very familiar with the work of various Chinese influence actors, and the AI work China has done to date has been interesting but not effective,” Linvill told Al Jazeera.

“It’s getting better with each passing month, and I’m concerned what they may be capable of in the future, but they aren’t there yet.”

“If China were really serious about meaningfully influencing the discourse around data centres using AI chat bots, I question if they would use OpenAI to do it,” Linvill added.

Opposition to the construction of data centres has been on the rise in the US, with at least 36 projects blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, according to Data Center Watch, a research project by AI security company 10a Labs.

In March, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced legislation that would impose a moratorium on new data centres until the introduction of national safeguards to mitigate the risks of AI.

The legislation has little chance of becoming law in the near future due to US President Donald Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and Republicans’ control of both chambers of Congress.

Opposition to data centres has been driven in part by the huge amounts of energy they consume supporting the computing power needed to train and run AI models such as ChatGPT.

The facilities accounted for 1.5 percent of global electricity use in 2024, with consumption growing 12 percent annually over the last five years, according to the International Energy Agency.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/11/openai-says-china-based-actors-stoking-opposition-to-ai-data-centres?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.