Connect with us

உலகம்

Trump halts $1.8bn ‘anti-weaponisation’ fund amid bipartisan backlash

Published

on

The announcement comes after Trump met with congressional Republicans over concerns about his settlement with the IRS.

United States President Donald Trump will reportedly drop his $1.8bn “anti-weaponisation” fund amid congressional backlash, including from fellow Republicans.

On Monday, US media indicated the fund would be paused, though the White House has yet to publicly confirm the reports.

Axios was the first to break the news, citing an unnamed senior official. “It’s dead for now,” the official told the news outlet.

The “anti-weaponisation” fund was announced last month as part of a settlement between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), part of his executive branch.

According to documents released by the Department of Justice, the $1.8bn was slated to serve as payment for victims of “lawfare” and government “weaponisation”.

Trump himself has repeatedly painted himself as such a victim, framing himself and his allies as victims of unfair government prosecution.

Monday’s announcement came after Trump met with House Speaker Mike Johnson over Republican concerns about the “anti-weaponisation” fund.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has likewise called for the fund to be dropped, as he seeks to rally Republicans to pass a $72bn immigration enforcement funding bill.

Still, Democrats on the Senate floor argued that the reported pause did not go far enough.

“The press reports that Trump says he will table his $2bn MAGA slush fund,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said, using the acronym for Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement.

“But a promise from Trump is worthless. If Trump and Republicans are truly abandoning this corrupt scheme, they should have zero problem banning it in law.”

Schumer pledged to advance legislation to “ensure no president can ever do this again”.

Plans for the $1.8bn “anti-weaponisation” fund were revealed on May 18, shortly after Trump agreed to drop his case against the IRS.

Trump had filed the lawsuit in January, alleging that the IRS was responsible for the leak of his tax returns, information from which was published in The New York Times and ProPublica, starting in 2020.

The Republican leader sought $10bn in damages, though critics argued that the lawsuit faced an uphill battle.

There were questions about whether it fell within the statute of limitations and whether the IRS could be held responsible for the actions of an outside contractor, Charles Littlejohn, who was convicted of leaking the documents.

The lawsuit and the subsequent settlement also raised outcry over apparent conflicts of interest, since Trump was in charge of the IRS and the Department of Justice, which represented the tax agency in court hearings.

After announcing the lawsuit’s settlement in May, the Department of Justice revealed its plans to set up the fund.

An additional settlement document also was made public, saying Trump and his family would have lifelong immunity from any IRS audits.

While the Department of Justice had yet to outline who would be eligible for the “anti-weaponisation” fund, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has declined to rule out Trump supporters involved in the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

The “anti-weaponisation” fund has since been criticised as a piggy bank for payouts to Trump allies, and it has faced both legal and congressional pushback.

At least three separate lawsuits have been filed to stop the “anti-weaponisation” fund, including one filed by police officers injured in the January 6 attack.

Last week, a federal judge temporarily blocked the creation of the fund while the court reviewed the case.

The plaintiffs in that lawsuit were represented by the nonprofit Democracy Forward, and they included Andrew Floyd, a former federal prosecutor involved in January 6 cases.

The third lawsuit was led by the government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

All three legal complaints challenged the Trump administration’s legal authority to establish the fund, pointing to the president’s conflicts of interest.

Separately, the federal judge in Florida that was slated to hear Trump’s $10bn IRS complaint has reopened the case, citing details of the settlement that only became public after the case was dropped.

In response to reports that the “anti-weaponisation” fund had been paused, CREW issued a statement that it “never should’ve been proposed in the first place”.

“Trump’s reported temporary abandonment is not enough, and it does not resolve the legal issues raised in CREW’s case or others seeking to block the fund,” Nikhel Sus, CREW’s chief counsel, told Al Jazeera.

“We will continue pressing forward our case until the illegal fund is shuttered permanently.”

Al Jazeera reached out for comment to the White House, which responded by pointing to a post from the Department of Justice on social media, saying it would comply with the court ruling to pause the fund.

“This fund was open to anybody who was so weaponised, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise,” the Justice Department said in the post.

Even members of the Republican Party were sceptical of the “anti-weaponisation” fund and the settlement overall.

“It doesn’t look right,” Senator Don Bacon of Nebraska told KMTV in Omaha. “You can’t do it that way, when you’re negotiating with yourself for yourself.”

In an interview with CNN, another Republican, outgoing Senator Thom Tillis, called the fund “a payout pot for punks”.

Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana were also among the fund’s critics.

In a rare sign of Republican backlash, the Republican-led Senate last month delayed passing a $72bn funding bill for Trump’s immigration enforcement initiative, in part as a protest against the “anti-weaponisation” fund.

The $1.8bn used for the fund would have bypassed congressional approval, instead drawing from a pot of money used by the Justice Department to handle government settlements.

With reports emerging that the White House had agreed to suspend the “anti-weaponisation” fund, Senate Republicans signalled the $72bn in immigration funding would be put back on track.

But Democrats on the Senate floor on Monday continued to express outrage.

“The president wants to hand lofty payouts to his political buddies and the criminals who attacked our democracy at his request,” said Senator Dick Durbin. “It reeks of corruption.”

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/1/trump-halts-1-8bn-anti-weaponisation-fund-amid-bipartisan-backlash?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

South Africa’s World Cup delegation departs for Mexico without coach

Published

on

Bafana Bafana’s departure was delayed due to non-issuance of visas for several players and support staff.

The South African national team members have left for their World Cup training base in Pachuca, Mexico, in advance of their opening game against the tournament cohosts on June 11.

The delegation that left on Monday did not include assistant coach Helman Mkhalele, who has yet to obtain a United States visa.

The charter flight departed Johannesburg following a frantic 24 hours after the squad was originally scheduled to leave on Sunday, but was held back by a delay in obtaining visas in what was described as an administrative bungle by the South African Football Association (SAFA).

Mkhalele, a former international winger who played 66 times for Bafana Bafana, including at their World Cup debut in France in 1998, will have to travel later after his visa application was initially denied.

Blaming the US Consulate General in Johannesburg for the delay, SAFA president Danny Jordaan told the South African Broadcasting Corporation, “They refused the visa, but gave no reasons. It is very difficult to deal with the process where you get no information.”

“We don’t know [why it was denied], we are clutching in the dark, but we hope the matter will be resolved [soon]. All of the players are [on the flight] and 99 percent of the technical staff.”

South Africa are due to play Jamaica in a friendly on Friday before taking on Mexico in the showpiece opening match in Mexico City.

“Now we are very happy that we can go to Mexico,” South Africa coach Hugo Broos said. “The past days have been a little bit stressful with all the problems we had, but those problems are behind us now, and we can focus on what’s coming.”

“These 10 days go very fast. Once we get there, we will start working, focusing on the first game against Mexico, so time will pass very quickly. I think everybody is looking forward to starting the World Cup.”

South Africa are in Group A and will face Czechia in Atlanta on June 18 and South Korea in Monterrey, Mexico, six days later.

They are appearing in their fourth World Cup and looking to advance from the group stage for the first time.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/6/2/south-africas-world-cup-delegation-departs-for-mexico-without-coach?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

At least 12 people killed, dozens wounded in Russian attacks on Ukraine

Published

on

Russia launches 656 drones and 73 missiles at Ukraine overnight, according to Ukraine’s air force.

Ukrainian authorities say at least 12 people have been killed and dozens wounded in Russian missile and drone strikes across Ukraine, days after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned that Moscow was preparing a major assault.

Russia launched 656 drones and 73 missiles at Ukraine overnight, Ukraine’s air force said on Tuesday.

Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said at least four people were killed in the Ukrainian capital and 58, including two children, were wounded in the “mass enemy attack”.

“Explosions in the city. Air defence forces are working! Stay in shelters!” Klitschko had warned earlier.

In the Dnipropetrovsk region in central Ukraine, at least eight people were killed and at least 36 others, including children, were wounded in Russian attacks, Governor Oleksandr Ganzha said.

Ten people, including a child, were wounded in the city of Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine, according to Mayor Ihor Terekhov.

Reporting from Kyiv, Al Jazeera’s Audrey Macalpine said the government had warned Ukrainians about a potential large-scale Russian attack and many had been sheltering in place.

Russia’s military said the bombardment targeted Ukraine’s military-industrial complex.

The “massive strike” using “high-precision weapons” was aimed at targets in Kyiv and the regions of Zaporizhia, Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk as well as energy and transport infrastructure used by the Ukrainian military in other regions, Russia’s Ministry of Defence said in a statement.

Meanwhile, a Ukrainian drone strike killed one person in Russia’s Kursk region near the border with Ukraine, Governor Alexander Khinshtein said.

Another drone attack sparked a fire at an oil refinery in the southwestern city of Krasnodar, local authorities said on Telegram.

The attacks on Ukraine came after Zelenskyy said on Friday that “we have intelligence information about Russia preparing a new massive strike” as he called on people to heed safety precautions.

“Please pay attention to air alerts. Protect your lives. Our services are working efficiently and are prepared. The air force and other defenders of our skies will be on duty 24/7, as always.”

This major Russian assault comes as United States-led peace efforts to end the war that began in February 2022 when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of neighbouring Ukraine have largely been paused as US President Donald Trump’s administration remains focused on conflicts in the Middle East.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/2/at-least-nine-people-killed-dozens-wounded-in-russian-attacks-on-ukraine?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Senegal president names government, boycotted by ally-turned-rival

Published

on

Ousted PM says his party, which holds the parliamentary majority, will not participate in new government.

Senegal’s President Bassirou Diomaye Faye has announced a new government featuring several members and allies of a party led by sacked prime minister and estranged ally Ousmane Sonko, who has pledged his group would not join it.

Faye’s announcement came on Monday during a live television broadcast, less than two weeks after he fired Sonko, his former mentor, and dismissed the cabinet following disagreements, including over the troubled economy.

A popular figure, Sonko was promptly elected speaker of parliament by allies in a vote boycotted by the opposition, deepening the political crisis in the West African country.

Sonko said in a post on X that he met on Monday with Faye and that “points of disagreement” emerged on the future role of the Pastef party.

Therefore, Pastef “will not participate in the next government and will not be represented by any ministers”, Sonko said. “We wish the new team every success.”

Sonko remains the undisputed leader of Pastef, the party he founded in 2014 – to which Faye also belongs – and which controls 130 of the 165 seats in Senegal’s only legislative body.

On Monday, Faye named senior economist Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo as prime minister, saying the new appointee had the expertise to steer Senegal out of its crippling debt.

Lo on Monday read out a list of 30 new ministers, including several Pastef members, but notable for the absence of several of its senior figures who had been in the previous government.

Sonko said his party would not join the cabinet after disagreeing about it with Faye during a “long conversation” on Monday.

“Some points of agreement were indeed confirmed, but also, above all, points of disagreement,” Sonko said in a statement on social media.

“Pastef will not take part and will not be represented by any ministers.”

Faye appointed Sonko as prime minister in April 2024, just days after being elected president.

Sonko would almost certainly have won the top job if he had not been barred from the presidential election due to a defamation conviction.

With his pan-Africanist rhetoric, Sonko had gained a following among young Senegalese after a power struggle with former President Macky Sall, who ruled from 2012 to 2024.

Tensions began to surface in July when the outspoken Sonko accused Faye of a “failure of leadership” by not backing him up enough against his many critics.

In May, the president took a shot at Sonko, saying the party needed to be “depersonalised” from any leader dominating it.

While Faye is open to discussions with the International Monetary Fund on a new loan programme, Sonko had advocated a more sovereign approach.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/2/senegal-president-names-government-boycotted-by-ally-turned-rival?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.