Connect with us

உலகம்

Zelenskyy asks Putin for meeting: What’s he offering, could Russia accept?

Published

on

Russia and Ukraine have been holding peace talks since the war began in 2022, but with no concrete outcome.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has written an open letter to Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and proposed a meeting to discuss ending Moscow’s four-year war on Kyiv.

The letter, which was published in full on the Ukrainian president’s website on Thursday and sent via diplomatic channels to Russia as well as countries including the United States, comes as Russia’s war on Ukraine continues to rage into its fifth year.

On Thursday, at least 12 people were killed and dozens injured in Russian attacks across Ukraine, according to Ukrainian authorities. Zelenskyy also commemorated at least 707 children killed by Russian attacks during the two countries’ more than four-year-long war.

Meanwhile, in Russian-occupied Ukraine, at least four people were killed in Ukrainian drone attacks on Thursday. Ukraine also struck an oil complex and naval base in St Petersburg, Russia, on Wednesday.

Russia and Ukraine have been holding indirect peace talks since the war began in February 2022, but with little or no concrete outcomes. US President Donald Trump has also met both Putin and Zelenskyy, seeking to bring them to the negotiating table to discuss ending the war, but so far, his efforts have not borne fruit.

Will Zelenskyy’s open letter to Putin open a new path to a ceasefire?

In his letter, Zelenskyy told Putin that he has spent nearly half of his 26 years in power in Russia “waging war against Ukraine” and said Russians are now growing increasingly tired of Ukrainian missiles and drone attacks, inflation and fuel shortages.

“We can all see that Russians are finally becoming less comfortable with this reality – with the fact that the war is bringing more and more negative consequences to Russia,” he wrote.

He also told Putin that a prolonged war could threaten the Russian president’s personal position. “It is a fact of Russian history that you know well: When Russia grows tired, change comes,” he said.

“After 26 years in power, age is beginning to take its toll. And with time, the fatigue with you will only grow,” he added.

Zelenskyy also wrote that while he and the Ukrainian people are less concerned about the loss of Russian lives on the battlefield, every loss of a Ukrainian counts. “Even when the ratio of Ukrainian losses to Russian losses is one to five or one to six, it still matters greatly.

“We in Ukraine do not want a permanent war. We know very well that life without war is infinitely better. And we want to achieve that,” he said.

Zelenskyy noted that with the US focused on its war on Iran, “it would be wrong to simply wait until the war in Europe returns to the centre of its attention,” and suggested a path to peace.

“Do not be afraid to take the path out of this war. That is the main thing that is required of you now.

“Ukraine proposes ending this war through direct engagement between us – and you. I am proposing a meeting… If you do not personally come to the conclusion that it is time to end this war, Ukraine will continue fighting for its existence,” he added.

Regarding the location of the meeting, Zelenskyy said: “There are countries that have traditionally hosted leaders to resolve issues of war and peace. Switzerland, Turkiye, the countries of the Arab world – many are able and willing to host such a meeting.

“We believe Europe should be part of this process – those who truly have the capacity to influence the situation. We also believe that the United States must be part of the process. This is what could help shape a new security architecture for our part of the world,” he added.

Writing on X, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha described the letter as “a serious and meaningful proposal to end the war … with clear, doable steps and an invitation for a personal meeting”.

“We expect a meaningful response to this proposal. It’s time to end this war. It’s time to choose peace.”

Markus Ziener, a senior visiting fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States Berlin office, told Al Jazeera that making the letter public forces Russia to openly show its hand while proving to the world that Ukraine is ready for diplomacy.

“It places the moral high ground and the pressure to respond entirely on the Kremlin,” he said.

He noted, however, that this is not the first time Zelenskyy has reached out to Putin.

“Most recently on May 11, 2025, he publicly and explicitly announced that he was ready to travel to Turkey to meet Putin in person for face-to-face talks,” he said.

Zelenskyy’s new proposal shows that the Ukrainian president “feels emboldened by the successful military pushbacks against the Russian army on the battlefield, including successfully targeting Russian infrastructure far in Russian mainland”, Ziener said.

“The Ukrainian president believes that, currently, the momentum is on his side and therefore it is good moment [to] offering talks.”

The Russian president’s spokesman told reporters in Russia that Putin was aware of Zelenskyy’s letter but had not yet been briefed about its content in detail.

But at Russia’s showcase annual economic forum in St Petersburg on Thursday, Putin said his troops were continuing to advance in Ukraine.

“The offensive is ongoing on a daily basis. At present, the Russian Federation has taken full control of the Luhansk People’s Republic – 100 percent. And Russia has brought more than 85 percent of the territory of the Donetsk People’s Republic under its control. (And) 80 percent of the territory of the Zaporizhzhia region,” he said, referring to three of the four regions in Ukraine which Moscow has claimed as its own since 2022.

“Naturally, under these circumstances, the Ukrainian side would like us to halt the advance. But rather than stopping that, it would be better to bring the war to an end altogether by agreeing to the compromises that were discussed in Anchorage,” he said, referring to a summit he held in Alaska with Trump, which ended without any agreement, in August 2025.

In his letter to Putin, Zelenksyy wrote that Ukraine had heard that Russia “promised in Alaska the resolution of certain issues concerning Ukraine and Europe”, but added that issues on Ukraine and Europe could not be decided in Anchorage.

“Since the war is taking place in Europe, and since Ukraine needs security guarantees, while you [Putin] also seek security guarantees for yourself, it would be logical to involve those who can genuinely serve as guarantors,” Zelenskyy said.

While it is unknown if Putin will accept Zelenskyy’s proposal, he told the conference in St Petersburg: “We are certainly prepared and willing to reach an agreement with Ukraine through peaceful means. Specifically, on the basis we discussed during our meeting with President Trump in Anchorage.

“As for what we might say to one another if we were to reach the end of the conflict, at the very least we could – and indeed should say, ‘Thank goodness it’s all over,'” he added.

So far, Putin has only agreed to meet Zelenskyy in Moscow or a third country, once a peace agreement is finalised.

Ziener said it is highly unlikely that Putin will agree to Zelenskyy’s latest proposal while Russia is militarily under pressure, as agreeing to direct talks could be seen as a weakness on the part of the Kremlin.

“Furthermore, meeting Zelenskyy as an equal would undermine years of Kremlin propaganda aimed at delegitimising the Ukrainian president,” he said.

Since Trump became president of the US for the second time in January 2025, he has been promising to end Russia’s war in Ukraine.

He has met both Russia’s President Putin and Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy in separate meetings to discuss ending the war, but so far, these efforts have not borne fruit.

Truce talks have largely stalled due to Russia’s insistence on keeping territory it has seized from Ukraine. Ukraine has stated that it is not prepared to cede any territory.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/5/zelenskyy-asks-putin-for-meeting-whats-he-offering-could-russia-accept?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

Police in Belfast use water cannon as anti-immigrant unrest continues

Published

on

Clashes come as family of knife attack victim calls for calm and condemns violence targeting immigrants.

Unrest in Northern Ireland: Second day of anti-immigration protests in Belfast

Police in the United Kingdom city of Belfast have used water cannon to disperse dozens of far-right protesters during a second night of unrest triggered by a knife attack involving a Sudanese refugee.

The clashes on Wednesday came as the family of the stabbing victim appealed for calm and condemned the wave of anti-immigrant violence in the city in Northern Ireland.

Police said the protesters threw “missiles” such as rocks and bottles at officers, while images from the scene showed several fires burning on the streets.

Police said officers deployed “water cannon in an attempt to maintain public order”.

But the unrest was markedly less severe than on Tuesday evening, when hundreds of masked men burned families out of their homes and set vehicles alight.

“We want to make it absolutely clear that overnight unrest is not welcome, and peaceful protest is the only way forward,” the family of the victim, Stephen Ogilvie, said in a statement.

“We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country… We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility,” it said.

The family added that Ogilvie, who lost an eye and suffered serious wounds to his neck and face, was in a stable condition.

Their appeal came as the suspect in the attack, a 30-year-old ‌Sudanese national named Hadi Alodid, appeared in court on charges including attempted murder.

He was remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to July 8.

Videos of the stabbing attack circulated online all day on Tuesday, sparking calls on social media for violent protest. Police had to help one family escape from a burning house, according to the Reuters news agency, while several cars and a bus were set on fire and reduced to shells.

Local politicians and a pastor said many of those targeted were Black.

UK minister Ruth Anderson said at least 27 people were made homeless in Belfast “because people went door-to-door to try and target foreign nationals”.

Resident Jamie Corry, 33, said he could only watch on as his house went up in flames.

“I was actually standing right there watching my whole house just go up, slowly but surely,” he told Reuters. “I told them and all, when they were lighting a car up on fire, ‘that’s my property, that’s my property’… and they still didn’t care.”

The attack comes at a time of heightened tensions in the UK following the murder of a student in Southampton who was handcuffed by police as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer, a Sikh man, had falsely alleged a racist attack.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted many messages that blamed migration on violence in the UK, sharing a post that argued that the “very deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and open borders” is increasing tensions.

Amid calls from Musk, other far-right agitators like Tommy Robinson called for more protests on Wednesday, Northern Ireland’s police chief said ⁠an extra 200 officers were being deployed on the streets.

“These idiots didn’t just target ethnic minority groups… they targeted society,” Chief ⁠Constable Jon Boutcher said of Tuesday night’s rioters.

Officers had to take a family that included a two-month-old baby to safety during Tuesday’s violence, which he branded “a huge act of self-harm by mindless idiots”.

Speaking in London, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the knife attack raised serious questions, but that “driving people out of their homes is not … the right way to respond”.

He condemned the unrest as “shocking and completely unacceptable”.

Anna Turley, the chairwoman of the UK’s governing Labour Party, meanwhile, said that online platforms were “playing a role in driving” the unrest and suggested Musk was one of the “bad faith actors” inflaming tensions.

The United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk condemned what he called “incitement” on social media. “Dehumanisation of whole groups within a society is totally unacceptable and frankly despicable,” he told reporters in Geneva, adding that the violence in both Northern Ireland and Southampton had been “really shocking”.

Social media providers, he insisted, must take seriously their responsibility to prevent hate speech and incitement to violence.

Immigration has historically been low in Northern Ireland, partly due to the three-decade conflict between mainly Catholic Irish nationalists seeking Irish unity and predominantly Protestant pro-British “loyalists” wanting to stay in the UK and the British military.

However, migration has increased in recent years, and there has been an increasing sentiment against it in both Northern Ireland and parts of the Republic of Ireland.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/police-in-belfast-use-water-cannon-as-anti-immigrant-unrest-continues?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Published

on

Dahiyeh crowds rally in favour of Iranian support against Israel

Defiant crowds of Hezbollah supporters rallied in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighbourhood to support Iran’s role in standing against Israel, and rejecting efforts to separate Lebanon’s war from Iran’s. Al Jazeera’s Heidi Pett reports.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/11/dahiyeh-crowds-rally-in-favour-of-iranian-support-against-israel?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

OpenAI says China-based actors stoking opposition to AI data centres

Published

on

AI company says ChatGPT accounts sought to ‘exploit and amplify existing public concerns’ about energy prices.

China-based actors are likely behind the use of ChatGPT for “covert influence operations” aimed at stoking opposition to data centres in the United States, OpenAI has said.

In a research report released on Wednesday, the company behind the world’s most popular AI chatbot said it had banned a cluster of accounts likely based in China for attempting to “manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI”.

OpenAI, whose release of ChatGPT in 2022 kicked off a global frenzy around AI, said the accounts were used to generate social media comments and images that blamed data centres for rising electricity prices in communities across the US.

Among other content, the accounts generated a comic strip showing a cigar-chomping businessman holding bags marked with dollar signs as a family reacted in shock to their electricity bill, according to the San Francisco-based company.

OpenAI said a second cluster of accounts had generated content casting US tariffs as an effort to “dominate technological competition” with China, and specified that the material should not mention Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While the campaign sought to “exploit and amplify existing public concerns” about energy prices, OpenAI found no evidence that it had a “meaningful” influence, the company said.

“Foreign influence operations have long sought to latch onto existing local issues and sincerely held beliefs, using them to build credibility, amplify divisions or exacerbate public distrust,” the ChatGPT creator said.

“In this case, the operators attempted to covertly insert themselves into an ongoing American debate about the future of the country’s AI capabilities while hiding who they were and what motivated them.”

China’s embassy in Washington, DC, said it was not familiar with the report but that it opposed “any groundless attacks or smears against China”.

“AI is profoundly changing the way people work and live. It is a new frontier for all humanity,” an embassy spokesperson said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.

“China believes in a people-centered approach to AI and advocates openness and inclusiveness to ensure AI is a force for good and for all.”

OpenAI is the latest prominent voice to suggest foreign influence could be behind opposition to AI in the US.

In May, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum told a policy event hosted by Breitbart News that the public’s increasingly negative sentiment towards the construction of data centres was not “organic” and could, in some cases, be linked to “foreign-sourced dark money”.

Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina, who studies foreign influence campaigns, expressed doubt that the campaign identified by OpenAI or any other coordinated effort would have much impact on the “volume or tone” of the public debate.

“My team is very familiar with the work of various Chinese influence actors, and the AI work China has done to date has been interesting but not effective,” Linvill told Al Jazeera.

“It’s getting better with each passing month, and I’m concerned what they may be capable of in the future, but they aren’t there yet.”

“If China were really serious about meaningfully influencing the discourse around data centres using AI chat bots, I question if they would use OpenAI to do it,” Linvill added.

Opposition to the construction of data centres has been on the rise in the US, with at least 36 projects blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, according to Data Center Watch, a research project by AI security company 10a Labs.

In March, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced legislation that would impose a moratorium on new data centres until the introduction of national safeguards to mitigate the risks of AI.

The legislation has little chance of becoming law in the near future due to US President Donald Trump’s laissez-faire approach to AI regulation and Republicans’ control of both chambers of Congress.

Opposition to data centres has been driven in part by the huge amounts of energy they consume supporting the computing power needed to train and run AI models such as ChatGPT.

The facilities accounted for 1.5 percent of global electricity use in 2024, with consumption growing 12 percent annually over the last five years, according to the International Energy Agency.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/6/11/openai-says-china-based-actors-stoking-opposition-to-ai-data-centres?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.