Connect with us

உலகம்

Jerome Powell: Steering the US Fed through COVID-19 and political pressures

Published

on

Trump’s aggressive push for interest rate cuts shaped Powell’s Fed legacy during his tumultuous leadership.

On Friday, Jerome Powell’s term as chair of the United States Federal Reserve Board of Governors will come to a close after months of tension between the White House and the central bank, as US President Donald Trump pushes for more aggressive interest rate cuts.

Powell’s term ends on May 15, and he will be succeeded by Trump appointee Kevin Warsh, who served on the central bank’s board of governors from 2006 to 2011. Powell will continue on the board as a governor after stepping down as chair.

Powell, who was first appointed by Trump in 2018, said he planned to stay on to help preserve the central bank’s independence.

The announcement came after Trump said he would fire Powell if he remained at the Fed beyond the end of his term as chair.

Al Jazeera takes a look back at the central bank chair’s career.

Powell’s tenure as Fed chair during Trump’s second term has been marked by political pressure as Trump pushed for more aggressive interest rate cuts than the Fed was willing to implement.

Powell stressed the central bank’s independence and consistently deflected criticism and rhetoric from the president, who gave him the nickname “Too Late Powell” in reference to the Fed’s hesitancy to cut rates quickly and sharply.

Under Powell’s leadership, the Fed did not begin cutting interest rates until September.

“His legacy was, ‘We need to reclaim independence for the Federal Reserve,’ and I think that’s exactly what he did,” Babak Hafezi, a professor of international business at American University, told Al Jazeera, referring to views that the Fed had been a little too close and in lockstep with the US government previously. “He fought the Trump administration on lowering interest rates.”

“I think he’s worked really hard not to be a political tool and to keep the Fed as independent as possible.”

Apart from a barrage of rude, threatening and demeaning comments from Trump targeted at Powell, the administration also launched an investigation into the Fed chair related to renovations at the Federal Reserve’s Washington headquarters. Government prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing.

The investigation, however, stood in the way of Trump’s latest appointment.

Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said he would not vote for any nominee to the central bank until the Department of Justice dropped its investigation into Powell.

The investigation was later suspended, and the Senate Banking Committee voted to advance Warsh.

It was not until his final news conference that Powell spoke more candidly about the political pressure.

“I worry these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policy without taking into consideration political factors,” Powell told reporters.

Those concerns come alongside other appointments and investigations that have raised questions among experts about the central bank’s independence.

Among them are Trump’s firing of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, who was appointed by former US President Joe Biden, a Democrat, over alleged mortgage fraud; the appointment of Trump ally Stephan Miran, previously chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers; and Trump’s remarks in December that he would only appoint someone who agreed with him on interest rates.

Although Trump in his first term as president had appointed Powell as Fed chair in 2018, by October of that year, Powell was already in Trump’s crosshairs as the Fed raised interest rates. Trump called the Fed “crazy” on X, then known as Twitter.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Trump claimed that Powell “almost looks like he’s happy raising interest rates”. The central bank raised rates four times in 2018, from 1.25–1.50 percent at the start of the year to 2.25-2.50 percent by the year’s end.

“The desires of Trump 1 and Trump 2 are the same, and that is lower Fed policy rates. Neither during the early days of the first Trump administration nor now is there a clear justification for cuts in the Fed funds rate target,” Brett House, an economics professor at Columbia University’s Business School, told Al Jazeera.

Trump continued the rhetorical pressure on Powell, calling him an “enemy” in August 2019 and pushing for his removal.

“Inflation was running pretty low, and the economy looked like it was slowing down,” Skanda Amarnath, a former analyst for the New York Federal Reserve, told Al Jazeera. “The Fed did show a lot of flexibility on that side. At the same time, when the data changed in 2021 and 2022, he was more than willing to raise interest rates if he thought inflation was a serious problem.”

Powell’s monetary policy took centre stage during the economic fallout at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Under Powell’s leadership, the Federal Reserve, alongside the Treasury Department, issued direct payments to individuals as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

The central bank also worked with the Treasury to launch several lending programmes, including the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which provided short-term relief to help small businesses stay afloat.

Among the measures the central bank took was the purchase of both US government and mortgage-backed securities. The Fed also cut short-term interest rates to a range of zero to 0.25 percent.

By the fall, Trump’s criticism of Powell had eased. In a November 2020 interview, Trump told Fox Business that he was “very happy with his performance”, Amarnath said.

When Powell’s term expired in 2021, Biden, then president, nominated him for another term as head of the central bank’s board of governors.

With inflation soaring to a 40-year high during the pandemic, the central bank ended up raising interest rates to 5.5 percent by July 2023.

“It turned out, both in retrospect and at the time, that they did need to raise rates substantially in the fastest rate-hiking cycle we’d seen in decades to address that spike in inflation,” House said.

“When one looks at the recovery from the COVID-induced shutdowns in 2020, it was a very fast recovery, and some inflation was one of the unfortunate byproducts of it. But in contrast with the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed and other policy institutions helped ensure a very quick rebound from the massive public health-related restrictions on the economy we put in place in March 2020,” House added.

Before taking on a leadership role, Powell served as one of the board’s seven governors. First appointed by US President Barack Obama in 2012, Powell advocated reforming “too big to fail” policies involving taxpayer-funded bailouts of large firms.

“Too big to fail must end, even if more intrusive measures prove necessary in the end,” Powell said in a 2013 speech.

By 2017, Powell asserted that regulators “made a great deal of progress” and concerns that banks were “too big to fail” were quelled.

Kevin Warsh is now set to take the helm of the central bank. During a contentious confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee in April, Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, accused Warsh of being a “sock puppet” for the president. Warsh denied such claims.

It is expected that the central bank will maintain interest rates well into 2027, keeping its benchmark rate between 3.5 and 3.75 percent as prices jumped last month by 3.8 percent on an annual basis, the largest uptick since May 2023. Analysts at JPMorgan forecast that the next change to rates will be a 25-basis-point hike in the third quarter next year as opposed to the cuts that the White House is pushing for.

CME FedWatch, which tracks the likelihood of monetary policy decisions, says there is a 97 percent chance that rates will remain unchanged at the next policy meeting, which will be June 16-17.

That could prove to be a major test for Warsh, who has vowed indepe

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/5/14/jerome-powell-steering-the-us-fed-through-covid-19-and-political-pressures?traffic_source=rss

உலகம்

FA Cup final: Chelsea vs Manchester City – teams, start, lineups

Published

on

Manchester City will continue their hunt for a domestic treble when they face Chelsea in Saturday’s FA Cup final.

Who: Chelsea vs Manchester City

What: English FA Cup final

Where: Wembley Stadium in London, United Kingdom

When: Saturday, May 16 at 3pm (14:00 GMT)

How to follow: We’ll have all the buildup on Al Jazeera Sport from 11 GMT in advance of our live text commentary stream.

History will be made on Saturday as Manchester City become the first side to line up in four consecutive finals as they take on Chelsea for the trophy.

Between them, the sides have won 15 FA Cup titles, but this is a first meeting between the clubs in the final itself – despite the teams between them appearing in five of the last six finals.

City, who have already claimed the League Cup, are still in with the chance of a domestic treble. Chelsea, however, have been engaged in a managerial merry-go-round – all off the back of beating Paris Saint-Germain to claim the expanded FIFA Club World Cup last year.

Al Jazeera Sport takes you through all the information you need to know in the run-up to the 145th FA Cup final.

Crystal Palace beat City 1-0 in last season’s final to lift the trophy for the first time in their history.

Eberechi Eze scored the only goal of the game after 16 minutes to sign off from the Eagles in style. The England forward joined Arsenal at the end of the season.

City had dominated the final with a staggering 78 percent of possession.

Chelsea overcame Leeds United 1-0 in their last four clash, with Enzo Fernandez scoring the only goal in the 23rd minute.

The Blues thumped Port Vale in the quarterfinals with a 7-0 win, while there was a more Hollywood feel to their clash with Wrexham in the prior round.

Extra time was required in their 4-2 win in Wales.

City were well tested in the semifinal by Championship side Southampton as Nico Gonzalez scored with three minutes remaining after Jeremy Doku’s 82nd-minute strike cancelled out Finn Azaz’s opener.

Liverpool were seen off in the quarterfinals with a 4-0 thumping at Etihad Stadium, while a 3-1 win was recorded at Newcastle United in the round prior to that.

Manchester City were 3-0 winners in the last meeting between the sides, which came in a Premier League fixture in west London on April 12.

All three goals came within 17 minutes of each other in the second half, with Nico O’Reilly, Marc Guehi and Jeremy Doku netting at Stamford Bridge.

City sit second in the English top flight, just two points behind leaders Arsenal with two games to play.

Club World Cup holders Chelsea have sacked both Enzo Maresca and Liam Rosenior this season and sit ninth in the league.

Calum McFarlane will be taking charge of his sixth game in his second spell as the club’s interim manager.

The teams last met in the FA Cup in a semifinal clash at Wembley Stadium in April, 2024.

Bernardo Silva scored the only goal of the game to send City through to the final, where they were beaten 2-1 by Erik ten Hag’s Manchester United.

Alejandro Garnacho, now of Chelsea, gave United the lead, which Kobbie Mainoo doubled before the break. Jeremy Doku netted an 87th-minute goal to set up a tense finale.

Chelsea have had their name etched on the trophy on eight occasions, with their first win coming in 1970 as they beat Leeds United 2-1 in a replay at Manchester United’s Old Trafford.

The first attempt ended in a 2-2 draw, leading to the first time a final would be replayed. Wembley hosted the opening match, but was unavailable for the replay due to the pitch being in unfit condition.

City have lifted the cup on seven occasions, with their first win coming in 1904 with a 1-0 win over Bolton Wanderers.

Chelsea’s last win came in 2022 and required penalties against Liverpool to seal the win.

The match ended 0-0 after extra time – the first final to end goalless since Sir Alex Ferguson’s Manchester United beat Arsene Wenger’s Arsenal on spot kicks in 2005.

City last lifted the trophy in 2023, beating Manchester United 2-1.

In a final that would see a rerun between the cross-city rivals the following year, Ilkay Gundogan opened the scoring in the first minute and later restored his side’s lead five minutes after the break, after a Bruno Fernandes penalty had levelled the tie at the break.

Arsenal are the record winners of the competition with 14 victories to their name. The first was in 1930 under the club’s famous manager, Herbert Chapman. The Gunners beat Huddersfield Town 2-0 in the final.

Their last win came in 2020 when they beat Chelsea 2-1. It was the first of three successive finals for the Blues, who tasted defeat the following year against Leicester City before the 2023 win against Liverpool.

Manchester United are the second-most successful side in the competition’s history with 13 wins. Chelsea’s eight victories are joint third on the list with Liverpool and Tottenham.

The first FA Cup final was staged in 1872 with Wanderers beating Royal Engineers 1-0 in a match staged at the Kennington Oval cricket ground, which remains the current home to the English county cricket club, Surrey.

This will be the 181st meeting between the teams, with Chelsea winning 99 of the meetings and Manchester City winning 68 of the encounters.

The first match was played in 1907 in the old Division One of English football (now the Premier League), with the match ending in a 2-2 draw in London.

This will be the 11th meeting between the sides in the FA Cup, with City winning six of the matches to Chelsea’s four wins.

The first cup meeting was in February, 1915, with Chelsea winning 2-1 in Manchester. City had to wait 33 years for a chance of cup revenge, which they took at first attempt with a 2-0 home win in January 1948.

This will be the side’s seventh meeting in the competition in the last 13 seasons.

Estevao Willian, Jamie Gittens and Jesse Derry are all out with injuries, but Robert Sanchez, Pedro Neto and Alejandro Garnacho have all trained in the build-up to the game as they attempt to shake off knocks.

Sanchez; Gusto, Fofana, Colwill, Hato; James, Caicedo; Palmer, Fernandez, Cucurella; Pedro

Guardiola made several changes to his starting lineup for their last outing in the Premier League game against Crystal Palace, ⁠with Erling Haaland playing no part.

The Norwegian will be leading City’s attack in Saturday’s showpiece, though, aiming to correct a remarkable statistic.

Haaland has scored 161 goals in 196 games for City in all competitions, yet has never found the net or made an assist in the 12 semifinals or finals in which he has ⁠featured.

Rodri remains an injury doubt with a groin issue.

Trafford; Nunes, Khusanov, Guehi, O’Reilly; Gonzalez, Bernardo; Semenyo, Cherki, Doku; Haaland

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/5/15/fa-cup-final-chelsea-vs-manchester-city-teams-start-lineups?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

BRICS talks end without joint statement as divisions over Iran war deepen

Published

on

Iran’s foreign minister had urged member states to condemn ‘violations of international law by the United States and Israel’.

The BRICS alliance of major developing economies has failed to issue a joint statement after their two-day meeting in India, amid internal divisions over the Iran war which is affecting several members.

India hosted the foreign ministers’ meeting in New Delhi and currently chairs the alliance. BRICS brings together core members Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, as well as newer members Ethiopia, Egypt, Iran, Indonesia and the UAE.

India said on Friday that “there were differing views among some members” regarding the conflict in the Middle East.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Thursday urged BRICS member states to condemn what he described as “violations of international law by the United States and Israel”.

The war has intensified tensions between Iran and its Gulf neighbours, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, a fellow BRICS+ member. Riyadh has yet to formally join the bloc.

Without directly naming the UAE, Araghchi told a news conference that a BRICS member had blocked parts of India’s statement. Iran repeatedly targeted its Gulf neighbour following the outbreak of the war on February 28, reportedly striking the UAE more than any other country involved in the conflict, including Israel.

“We have no difficulty with that certain country, they have not been our target in the current war. We only hit American military bases and American military installations, which are unfortunately on their soil,” Araghchi said.

The UAE representative, Minister of State, Khalifa bin Shaheen Al Marar, rejected Araghchi’s remarks, accusing him of attempting to justify “terrorist attacks” against the UAE and other Gulf states. Al Marar said Iran had launched approximately 3,000 attacks on the UAE using ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and drones.

India’s statement highlighted areas of consensus among BRICS members, including calls for reforms to global governance institutions, such as the United Nations and the Security Council. The bloc reiterated its longstanding demand for greater representation of Global South countries within international institutions, reflecting its broader push for a multipolar world order.

The foreign ministers also discussed Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. They agreed that Gaza was an “inseparable part” of any future independent Palestinian state, stressing the importance of unifying the enclave with the occupied West Bank under the governance of the Palestinian Authority. However, the statement noted that one unnamed country had expressed reservations about certain aspects of the section on Gaza.

The group further called on all parties to respect the ceasefire in Lebanon, which critics have denounced as a halt in hostilities in name only. Without singling out a specific country, the ministers condemned the use of economic sanctions as a form of coercion.

Sudan was also on the agenda. The African country remains in the grip of what the UN has described as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. Ministers called for an immediate ceasefire, saying that only a peaceful solution through dialogue could bring a lasting end to the civil war, which began more than three years ago. They also warned that Sudan could become fertile ground for what ministers described as “extremism” and “terrorism”.

Also discussed was the situation in Syria, which is recovering from the civil war that effectively ended in December 2024 following the overthrow of longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad.

India’s statement called for a peaceful and inclusive political transition. The parties further stressed the importance of eliminating what they described as “foreign terrorist fighters” in Syria, saying they pose a security threat to both the country and the wider region.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/15/brics-talks-end-without-joint-statement-as-divisions-over-iran-war-deepen?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

உலகம்

UAE to accelerate oil pipeline project to bypass Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

The crown prince of the UAE says the project would help ‘meet global demands’.

The United Arab Emirates is fast-tracking the construction of a new pipeline, which will double the export capacity through Fujairah, a port city in the country’s east, as Gulf nations seek to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.

Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed announced the acceleration of the West-East Pipeline project to “meet global demands”, at an executive meeting held by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) on Friday.

The pipeline should be operational by 2027, the government’s Abu Dhabi Media Office said.

Sheikh Zayed said ADNOC is “well positioned as a responsible and reliable global energy producer, with the operational flexibility to responsibly increase production to meet market needs when export constraints allow”.

The United States and Israel’s war on Iran shook global energy supply chains across the world.

With the blockade on the Strait of Hormuz – through which previously about a fifth of the world’s oil passed – and Iran’s new maritime protocol in the waterway, as well as attacks on energy infrastructure, Gulf nations have been forced to find alternative trade routes to maintain oil and gas exports.

Currently, the UAE has the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (ADCOP), a 380km (235-mile) pipeline which runs from Habshan, an oil and gasfield in the southwestern area of Abu Dhabi, to the port of Fujairah – which has come under attack recently.

The pipeline, which started working in 2012, has the capacity of about 1.5 million barrels of oil per day (bpd). It is one of the key energy routes in the Middle East.

Saudi Arabia also has the East-West pipeline, designed to export the kingdom’s oil, concentrated in the country’s east, via the west coast, which has been less affected by the Iran war.

Saudi’s pipeline is 1,200km (745 miles) long, running from the Abqaiq oil processing centre to the Yanbu port on the Red Sea. State oil giant Aramco’s Chief Executive Amin Nasser has called it a “critical lifeline” for the kingdom.

Oman borders the Gulf of Oman with an extensive coastline outside the Strait of Hormuz, while Kuwait, Iraq, Qatar, and Bahrain depend almost entirely on the waterway for their trade shipments.

Last month, the UAE announced its departure from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in order to focus on “national interests”. The UAE said this move was part of its “long-term strategic and economic vision and evolving energy profile”.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/15/uae-to-accelerate-oil-pipeline-project-to-bypass-hormuz?traffic_source=rss

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 by 7Tamil Media, All rights reserved.