The stars of hit shows like Adolescence, Amandaland, The Celebrity Traitors and Last One Laughing will gather later to find out who has won a Bafta Television Award, on one of the biggest nights in the British TV calendar.

After hoovering up almost every available accolade over the past year – from National TV Awards to Golden Globes and Emmys – Adolescence leads the field at the Baftas.

The hard-hitting Netflix series is up for seven prizes on Sunday night, while sitcom Amandaland has four nominations in the comedy categories.

Erin Doherty and Aimee Lou Wood have two individual acting nominations, while Alan Carr, Bob Mortimer and Romesh Ranganathan are all also named twice on the shortlists.

Adolescence is frontrunner to win best limited drama, and five of its cast have acting nominations – Stephen Graham, Owen Cooper, Erin Doherty, Ashley Walters and Christine Tremarco.

The scene where Jamie, played by Cooper, snaps at Doherty's psychologist, is nominated for the memorable moment accolade – the only award to be voted for by the public.

The show has already won two Baftas at the organisation's Craft Awards, which recognise behind-the-scenes achievements and were handed out two weeks ago.

Doherty's other nomination is for best actress for her role in Disney+'s A Thousand Blows, which is also up for best drama.

Like Doherty, Aimee Lou Wood is up for both best actress and best supporting actress – for BBC Three comedy-drama Film Club and HBO/Sky dark comedy The White Lotus respectively.

Other nominees in the leading acting categories include Colin Firth (Lockerbie: A Search for Truth), Jodie Whittaker (Toxic Town), Matt Smith (The Death of Bunny Munro), Sheridan Smith (I Fought The Law) and Taron Egerton (Smoke).

Amandaland is up for best scripted comedy, and three of its cast are competing for best comedy actress – Lucy Punch, Philippa Dunne and Jennifer Saunders, the latter of whom played Amanda's aunt in the Christmas special.

The Celebrity Traitors, the most-watched show of 2025, is up for best reality show, while its host Claudia Winkleman is shortlisted for best entertainment performance.

Alan Carr's victory is one of the memorable moment nominees, and he's also in contention for best entertainment performance for another show, Amanda & Alan's Spanish Job.

Bob Mortimer is also in the entertainment performance race for his victorious stint in the first series of Last One Laughing, which is in the running for best entertainment programme.

And Romesh Ranganathan has two citations in the best entertainment performance category – for Romesh: Can't Knock the Hustle, and alongside Rob Beckett for Rob & Romesh Vs…

Dame Mary Berry will be bestowed with Bafta's highest honorary award, the Bafta Fellowship, while Martin Lewis will receive the Special Award.

The ceremony will be on BBC One and BBC iPlayer from 19:00 BST on Sunday.

The event will be broadcast a couple of hours after it actually takes place, and BBC News will publish details of the winners as they are announced in real time on its live page – before they are shown on TV.

Taskmaster star Greg Davies will host for the first time – taking over from last year's MC Alan Cumming, who hosted the Bafta Film Awards this year.

Davies is a hugely popular and accomplished comedian, comedy actor and host, who is likely to bring his affectionately scathing style with celebrities – as seen on Taskmaster and Never Mind the Buzzcocks.

Presenters of individual awards will include Celia Imrie, Richard Osman, Jessica Gunning, Chris McCausland, Dani Dyer, Danny Dyer, Lennie James, Lenny Rush, Marisa Abela, Mel Giedroyc, Sue Perkins, Tinie Tempah, Nick Frost, Nick Mohammed, Paapa Essiedu and Rick Astley.

There will also be musical performances by Celebrity Traitors finalist Cat Burns and Norwegian artist Aurora, who will sing her song Through the Eyes of a Child from Adolescence during the In Memoriam section.

The ceremony is taking place at London's Southbank Centre.

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0q2wqpzqwyo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Under the first-past-the-post electoral system, the candidate or candidates with the most votes in each seat are elected. It is used in the UK at general elections and in local elections such as the ones just held in England.

An alternative is a system of proportional representation under which some attempt is made to distribute seats to reflect the popularity of parties. Both the Scottish Parliament and the Senedd in Wales use systems of proportional representation.

First-past-the-post has long been regarded as a friend of the Conservative and Labour parties.

It makes it difficult for small parties whose vote is evenly spread geographically to win seats. This helps to keep potential challengers to the Conservatives and Labour out of the House of Commons. Indeed, because that is the case, voters may be reluctant to vote for them in the first place.

Historically, the system has also given whoever is the victor in the electoral battle between Conservative and Labour a boost in seats. The two parties thus both get the chance of securing a period of untrammeled majority government rather than having to negotiate the rocky shores of minority or coalition government.

However, Thursday's election results raise questions about whether first-past-the-post will continue to benefit the Conservatives and Labour in future. Rather, they have shown that the system is colour blind in how it operates

The results confirmed that Britain has now entered an unprecedented era of multi-party politics. According to the BBC's projected national share, if the whole country had had the chance to vote in a local election on Thursday Reform would have come first with 26% of the vote and the Greens (narrowly) second on 18%. The Conservatives and Labour would have been left with just 17% each. Their joint tally of 34% represents a record low. Even the Liberal Democrats – who regularly perform relatively well in local elections – were not far behind on 16%.

This not long after fewer than three in five people voted Conservative or Labour in the 2024 general election. That was the lowest proportion since and including 1922, when Labour first became the Conservatives' principal competitors.

This rise in third party voting suggests that first-past-the-post is no longer proving effective at discouraging people from backing parties other than Conservative or Labour. Once upon a time, Conservative and Labour politicians would cry, 'A Liberal vote is a wasted vote'. That kind of argument has seemingly lost its force.

Moreover, those who voted for Reform and the Greens have now seen that a vote for their parties can in fact result in them winning seats. With just a handful of results yet to be declared, the joint tally of council seats won by Reform and the Greens stands at 2,063, almost 200 more than the total of 1,864 won jointly by the Conservatives and Labour. Meanwhile, Britain's traditional third party, the Liberal Democrats, have won 842 local council seats too.

This is a very different picture from the 2024 general election, when the Conservatives and Labour won 533 seats, while Reform and the Greens jointly were left with just nine, despite scoring over 20% of the vote between them.

Indeed, rather than helping to insulate the Conservatives and Labour from the challenge posed by the new challengers, the system served on Thursday to exaggerate the loss of support they were suffering in the ballot box.

For both Labour and the Conservatives, their share of the vote fell most heavily in wards they were trying to defend. In a sample of more than 1,000 wards where the BBC has collected the detailed voting statistics, support for Labour fell on average compared with 2022 (the year when most of the seats being contested on Thursday were last fought over) by 25 points where the party was trying to defend the seat. The drop was just 12 points in the seats they were not defending. In the case of the Conservatives the equivalent figures are 14 points and 10 points respectively.

Such a pattern inevitably meant that the loss of seats that the two parties suffered – more than 1,400 in the case of Labour and more than 500 in the case of the Conservatives – was higher than it would otherwise have been.

In this new era of multi-party politics, the first-past-the-post system also delivered Reform a majority in a number of councils despite winning less than half the vote in them. In the BBC's sample of detailed voting results, there are eight councils where Reform won a majority of the seats being contested this year despite winning less than half the vote. Examples include Dudley, Plymouth and Rochdale. Indeed, Reform won more than half the seats on less than half the vote on more occasions than either the Conservatives or Labour.

Moreover, the boost that Reform sometimes enjoyed was in some instances considerable. In those councils where the party won more than half the seats, Reform won just 36% of the vote on average. Yet this proved sufficient for them to secure as much as 67% of the seats.

A similar discrepancy is evident in the equivalent figures for the Conservatives and Labour. Most notably, Labour won just 29% of the vote in both Ealing and Merton in London, yet this was still enough to put the party at the head of a very crowded field in both. As a result, the party won 66% and 56% of the council seats respectively.

Under first-past-the-post, what matters is not the absolute share of the vote that a party enjoys but rather how well it has performed compared with other parties. Under fragmented politics that means a relatively low – but still winning – share of the vote can enjoy a highly disproportional reward. As a result, it can open up the prospect of governments – including even majority governments – being elected on relatively low shares of the vote.

Indeed, first-past-the-post even means that a party that is losing support at the ballot box can still make significant gains in terms of seats if its principal opponents are losing votes even more heavily. This is what happened in the one council where the Conservatives gained control, Westminster. Support for the party fell by five points in the borough. However, support for Labour, who were defending their control of the council, fell by even more – 17 points. The Greens won 17% of the vote but no seats and the upshot was the Conservatives were able to gain control.

In the case of the Liberal Democrats, this phenomenon was evident more broadly. The party's support was down on average by four points compared with four years ago. This was even true of the wards the party won. Yet this did not stop it making a net gain of nearly 100 seats, thanks to the fact that both Conservative and Labour support was falling even more heavily.

As a party that was simply just one of a crowded pack rather than, like Reform in the lead, the system inevitably was kind to the Greens in fewer instances. That said, in Manchester, the party was able to win 56% of the seats at stake off the back of just 37% of the vote. Equally, its success in denying Labour control of both Cambridge and Exeter was aided by favourable treatment from the electoral system.

Yet despite first-past-the-post's tendency to be kind to winners, when the political field becomes as crowded as it is now, it is far from guaranteed that it will produce an overall majority for any one party. One in three of the 63 councils where all the seats were up for grabs on Thursday are now in no overall control. Before Thursday only half a dozen of them were in that position.

Even first-past-the-post cannot be relied upon to avoid the prospect of minority or coalition government if electoral support is shared across a plethora of parties.

If it continues, Britain's fragmented politics creates the prospect of significant changes in the way elections are fought, parliament is run, and governments rule. The results of Thursday's local elections suggest that it may see the country

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxpqyndqwlo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Daniel Dubois (right) has picked up 22 of his 23 victories by stoppage

Daniel Dubois survived two knockdowns – the first after just 10 seconds – to dethrone a bloodied but courageous Fabio Wardley in the 11th round of a thrilling heavyweight classic and become a two-time world champion.

Wardley floored his fellow Briton early with a flush right hand and dropped him again in the third, before Dubois regrouped and responded with wave after wave of heavy shots.

The Ipswich fighter, his nose damaged and one eye swollen shut, staggered around the ring yet somehow stayed on his feet and continued to fire back.

As the contest drifted into uncomfortable territory, the referee had eventually seen enough and halted the fight. A distraught Wardley sank to his knees as Dubois celebrated capturing the WBO heavyweight title.

"It was a war, thank you Fabio for that, thank you. I know I've got heart, bundles of heart. I'm a warrior in there," Dubois told DAZN.

"I had to get back up, bounce it off and come back harder. I'm a warrior."

In a week when Dubois' mentality was questioned, the 28-year-old silenced his critics with a clinical display of heart and power.

Dubois picked up his 23rd professional victory and reasserted himself at the top of the division as Wardley, 31, lost for the first time in 22 fights.

With knockout power stacked heavily on both sides, the fight joined a rare crop of elite encounters to live up to its pre-fight hype, as promoter Frank Warren confirmed there is a rematch clause.

Relive Dubois ' knockout of Wardley in wild world title fight

'Save him' – reacts to Dubois' stoppage of Wardley

Having arrived an hour later than the champion to the venue because of Manchester traffic, Dubois made a brisk, business-like ringwalk.

Wardley, in his first appearance since being upgraded to world champion, soaked in the atmosphere with a leisurely entrance. Draped in an Ipswich Town Football Club robe, he was greeted by a warm reception from the 18,000-strong crowd.

With a combined record of 42 wins – 40 coming by knockout – there was palpable anticipation inside the arena, and Wardley stayed true to his promise to bring the action early as Dubois immediately hit the canvas after a flush right hand.

Dubois winked to his corner but looked shell-shocked. He wrestled Wardley to the ground as both fighters swung for the hills.

Many expected Dubois to impose himself early before Wardley could settle. Considered the better technical boxer, he regrouped and landed a right in the second.

Momentum swung again in the third when Wardley, who looked sharp with his overhand right and uppercuts, sent Dubois wobbling. Dubois took a knee and survived the count before firing back with a right hand that rocked Wardley.

The fighters and fans struggled to catch a breath as trainer Don Charles urged Dubois to lean on his jab, and he followed that instruction to take control of proceedings.

Dubois' left eye was swollen, but Wardley's face looked a mess as Dubois set up his attacks with a left jab before landing his biggest shots in the fourth and the sixth.

Wardley, who was working in recruitment a decade ago, showed an extraordinary chin and heart as he refused to go down despite his legs trembling and blood pouring down his face.

Most would likely have been withdrawn by their corner, but Wardley has built a reputation on dramatic comebacks. This time, however, it felt different.

The doctor inspected Wardley's injuries before the eighth round and allowed him to continue.

By the ninth, the referee looked ready to intervene as Wardley continued to absorb heavy punishment and the contest became increasingly difficult to watch.

Doctors again allowed Wardley to continue before the 10th and when the stoppage finally arrived in the 11th, there was almost a sense of relief.

A sensational fight had reached its conclusion.

Warren – a veteran of 45 years in the sport – described it as "the best heavyweight fight" he has ever promoted.

Daniel Dubois came into the contest weighing a career-heavy 18st (115kg)

Wardley's trademark resilience was on display, but the champion – relaxed and composed throughout fight week – may ultimately have underestimated Dubois.

Yet even in defeat, Wardley remains one of the division's top contenders and his rise from white-collar boxing to world level in under a decade suggests there is still room for growth.

For Dubois, this victory adds another defining chapter to a career shaped by both setbacks and statement performances.

Defeats by Joe Joyce and twice to Oleksandr Usyk had raised questions about his place among the best, but this win emphatically restores his standing.

"[Fabio] is a durable guy, durable warrior, great warrior. Thank you for a great fight, man. It was an honour to be in the ring with you," Dubois said.

"I want to grow from this fight, improve and come back even better and go on to reign as champion again."

A third fight with Usyk – and another shot at undisputed glory – is the obvious next chapter.

Yet if the Ukrainian defeats Rico Verhoeven later this month as expected, there may be little appetite for a trilogy after two convincing wins.

A rematch with Wardley would be an easy sell and will likely happen.

A showdown with the highly rated Moses Itauma would also capture the imagination, while the winner of a proposed clash between Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury could yet target Dubois for one final shot at world honours.

For now, though, Dubois has reminded the division that he is still one of its most dangerous and destructive forces.

Notifications, social media and more with BBC Sport

📰 மூல செய்தி (Source): https://www.bbc.com/sport/boxing/articles/cx21w2d8n9qo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss